原帖由 henrytam 於 2007-1-1111:53 AM 發表
所以能夠作客和波已經收貨:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:
:icon075:
我都未見過一個無中堅同前鋒既陣:icon101:
原帖由 Manu super fans 於 2007-1-1115:13 發表
我都唔明點解哩樣野可以串左我地幾年，四大皆空者，友賽拎杯仔幾咁閒wor...:icon101::icon116:
我已經無視左個post :icon101:
原帖由 捷克NeVeD子彈 於 2007-1-1112:25 AM 發表
八射六中入六球?:icon063:
杜迪克真係打中堅好過啦:icon101:
比人咒完唔識救波:icon074::icon074::icon101:
原帖由 Eggio 於 2007-1-1103:39 PM 發表
:icon075:
我都未見過一個無中堅同前鋒既陣:icon101:
名義上係艾辛和保羅費拉柴既:icon101::icon101::icon101:
連前鋒都冇???:icon101:
有冇人有lineup?:icon101:
原帖由 chungundertaker 於 2007-1-1104:45 PM 發表
比人咒完唔識救波:icon074::icon074::icon101:
最大原因係巴公公:icon101:
原帖由 henrytam 於 2007-1-1105:14 PM 發表
名義上係艾辛和保羅費拉柴既:icon101::icon101::icon101:
連前鋒都冇???:icon101:
有冇人有lineup?:icon101:
Chelsea are expected to line-up in the following 4-3-3 formation.
40 Hilario
14 Geremi
20 Paulo Ferreira
5 Michael Essien
3 Ashley Cole
13 Michael Ballack
4 Claude Makelele (c)
12 John Obi Mikel
24 Shaun Wright-Phillips
21 Salomon Kalou
18 Wayne Bridge
Subs: 41 Yves Ma Kalambay, 33 Nuno Morais, 8 Frank Lampard, 49 Scott Sinclair, 47 Ben Sahar.
Wycombe are expected to line-up in the following 4-4-2 formation:
Ricardo Batista; Russell Martin, Will Antwi, Mike Williamson, Stephen O'Halloran; Kevin Betsy, Tom Doherty, Stefan Oakes, Matt Bloomfield; Tommy Mooney, Jermaine Easter.
Subs: Jamie Young, Ikechi Anya, Sergio Torres, Jonny Dixon, Chris Palmer.
橋打前鋒:icon101:
好明顯係Kalou啦
奧拿里奧踢中場中?:icon063:
個2件新仔ok ,踢多2年應該可以企穩後備
科拿球波幾靚
原帖由 kensai 於 2007-1-1107:58 PM 發表
Chelsea are expected to line-up in the following 4-3-3 formation.
40 Hilario
14 Geremi
20 Paulo Ferreira
5 Michael Essien
3 Ashley Cole
13 Michael Ballack
4 Claude Makelele (c)
12 Joh ...
i like this formation:icon040::icon040::icon040::icon042::icon101:
4-6-0:icon023::icon101::icon101:
頂 ,第4球希比亞掛住舉手無追人 ,雖然真係offside 姐
杜迪上半場真係同紙牌差唔多:icon101:
2:1 同 3:1 個球係reina 應該唔洗失啦頂
2:1 個球一睇就令我諗起當年艾文40碼個球
原帖由 henrytam 於 2007-1-1110:53 PM 發表
i like this formation:icon040::icon040::icon040::icon042::icon101:
4-6-0:icon023::icon101::icon101:
上年羅馬都試過啦:icon101:
原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2007-1-1111:00 PM 發表
杜迪上半場真係同紙牌差唔多:icon101:
2:1 同 3:1 個球係reina 應該唔洗失啦頂
2:1 個球一睇就令我諗起當年艾文40碼個球
2:1個球省中人牆
原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2007-1-1111:00 PM 發表
2:1 個球一睇就令我諗起當年艾文40碼個球
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3UE14PegXI
:icon053::icon032::icon023::icon101:
原帖由 ohcl 於 2007-1-1111:16 PM 發表
2:1個球省中人牆
改變左幾多方向先得架:icon101:
原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2007-1-1111:28 PM 發表
改變左幾多方向先得架:icon101:
其實少少都好影響ga la
你要重新判決過ga ma
頂 ,柏列達5:1 個球搏曬老命咁衝埋去亞里迪亞利度 ,人地一避就過左佢
其實2:1 個球究竟中邊個 ,我睇左好多次都睇唔到
原帖由 熱刺#29戴維斯 於 2007-1-1111:18 PM 發表
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3UE14PegXI
:icon053::icon032::icon023::icon101:
睇番又想講多次呢個星期成日講個句
"如果係REINA 可能飛到盡救到"
不過個季REINA 未黎架可?:icon101: