原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2009-4-119:01 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
點解罰vettel唔罰kubica? 我都係咁諗
一係兩個都唔罰, 要罰一定罰kubica 關閘
“The Stewards having considered the new elements presented to them from the 2009 Australian Formula One Grand Prix, consider that driver No 1 Lewis Hamilton and the competitor Vodafone McLaren Mercedes acted in a manner prejudicial to the conduct of the event by providing evidence deliberately misleading to the Stewards at the hearing on Sunday 29th March 2009, a breach of Article 151c of the International Sporting Code.
"Under Article 158 of the International Sporting Code, the driver No 1 Lewis Hamilton and the competitor Vodafone McLaren Mercedes are excluded from the race classification for the 2009 Australian Grand Prix and the classification is amended accordingly."
最後都係得個吉 :icon097:
原帖由 Hakkinen 於 2009-4-206:06 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
“The Stewards having considered the new elements presented to them from the 2009 Australian Formula One Grand Prix, consider that driver No 1 Lewis Hamilton and the competitor Vodafone McLaren Merced ...
俾假口供:o
原帖由 Hakkinen 於 2009-4-109:59 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
我都係咁諗
一係兩個都唔罰, 要罰一定罰kubica 關閘
罰 Kubica 咩 ?
罰佢過左 Vettel 唔自動彈開俾返佢過 ?
我認為呢件事係 50/50
要罰 vettel 可能係太 harsh
但係如果要罰 Kubica 就真係好笑
我唔覺得佢有所謂關閘食埋 vettel 條線
完全夠 2 架車過
只係 vettel 自己 no grip 轉唔到彎撞埋去
[ 本帖最後由 jacky422213 於 2009-4-312:48 AM 編輯 ]
麥拿倫+FIA集體腦殘:icon101: :icon101: :icon101:
咸美頓半推半就之下做埋共犯
只有認命吧:icon102:
剛剛好似話mclaren 個賽車主管什麼的被停職了
aiya
好慘呀 little lewis
唔拒絕得車隊既指示
Pos No Driver Team Q1 Q2 Q3 Laps
1 22 Jenson Button Brawn-Mercedes 1:35.058 1:33.784 1:35.181 18
2 9 Jarno Trulli Toyota 1:34.745 1:33.990 1:35.273 20
3 10 Timo Glock Toyota 1:34.907 1:34.258 1:35.690 24
4 16 Nico Rosberg Williams-Toyota 1:35.083 1:34.547 1:35.750 21
5 14 Mark Webber RBR-Renault 1:35.027 1:34.222 1:35.797 19
6 5 Robert Kubica BMW Sauber 1:35.166 1:34.562 1:36.106 19
7 4 Kimi Räikkönen Ferrari 1:35.476 1:34.456 1:36.170 17
*8 23 Rubens Barrichello Brawn-Mercedes 1:34.681 1:34.387 1:35.651 20
9 7 Fernando Alonso Renault 1:35.260 1:34.706 1:37.659 15
10 6 Nick Heidfeld BMW Sauber 1:35.110 1:34.769 14
11 17 Kazuki Nakajima Williams-Toyota 1:35.341 1:34.788 13
12 1 Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 1:35.280 1:34.905 13
**13 15 Sebastian Vettel RBR-Renault 1:34.935 1:34.276 1:35.518 17
14 2 Heikki Kovalainen McLaren-Mercedes 1:35.023 1:34.924 14
15 11 Sebastien Bourdais STR-Ferrari 1:35.507 1:35.431 16
16 3 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:35.642 4
17 8 Nelsinho Piquet Renault 1:35.708 11
18 21 Giancarlo Fisichella Force India-Mercedes 1:35.908 8
19 20 Adrian Sutil Force India-Mercedes 1:35.951 10
20 12 Sebastien Buemi STR-Ferrari 1:36.107 9
*巴大叔換波箱退5名去到第8
**VETTEL被罰10名去到第13
俾場雨害得最慘都係 Rosberg
你地估黎緊o個代有咩人可以上位呢?
我睇好vettel、sutil、rosberg
FIA宣佈雙層擴散器合法
2009年04月15日
國際汽車聯會(FIA)上訴法庭在巴黎宣佈，經過深入研究之後，裁定布朗GP、威廉士及豐田新研發的可變形車尾擴散器合法，可以繼續使用。
[ 本帖最後由 tom 於 2009-4-1508:35 PM 編輯 ]
vettel呢招:icon112:
星期日 spain gp
法拉利膠一膠, 馬沙第4變第6
Ferrari Administrative Board: No F1 in 2010 if the rules don’t change
Maranello 12 May 2009 - Ferrari confirms its opposition to the new technical regulations adopted by the Fia and does not intend entering its cars in the 2010 F1 Championship
:icon89:
原帖由 者尺 於 2009-5-1223:14 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Ferrari Administrative Board: No F1 in 2010 if the rules don’t change
Maranello 12 May 2009 - Ferrari confirms its opposition to the new technical regulations adopted by the Fia and does not inten ... 威脅嗎:o
繼老法之後, 雷諾仍發表聲明表示如果唔更改規則將會退出2010 F1
而家fia做咩都死
真係抵佢
溫馨提示
今晚有monaco gp @ 2000:icon117:
MASSA 想過VETTEL過唔到比ROSBERG過埋:icon101: