原帖由 terry1225 於 2007-8-903:45 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
yes:icon074:
轉explorer試下 :icon101:
想擴場:icon101:
負$可以負到幾多?
d息點計:icon092:
原帖由 ok1010 於 2007-8-1605:16 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
想擴場:icon101:
負$可以負到幾多?
d息點計:icon092:
最多可以負到500萬, 但連續兩周經濟更新時都負多過500萬就會破產,
利息唔太清楚, 唔知係唔係 負錢既total x 5% x 2/3
[ 本帖最後由 leewaikei23 於 2007-8-1605:32 PM 編輯 ]
原帖由 leewaikei23 於 2007-8-1605:23 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
最多可以負到500萬, 但連續兩周經濟更新時都負多過500萬就會破產,
利息唔太清楚, 唔知係唔係 負錢既total x 5% x 2/3
好似唔至2週的~!
睇埋聽日坐幾多先:icon101:
如果連輸2場之後
聽日對榜尾坐到多過10000人即擴:icon118:
就快 shutdown...
System Information
Planned shut downs during the next two weeks:
20-08-2007 at 06.00 for 60 minutes.
X
今朝update trainer 跌 leadership :icon083: :icon083: :icon083: :icon083: :icon083: :icon083: :icon106: :icon106: :icon106: :icon106:
作客試玩3-4-3:icon101:
用依個陣有咩需要注意??:icon064:
原帖由 輝 於 2007-8-2404:40 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
作客試玩3-4-3:icon101:
用依個陣有咩需要注意??:icon064:
後衛 : 睇對方邊路攻擊勁, 如果對方只係得中路, 可能放三個中後衛, 如果對方得一邊同中路勁, 可以兩個中後衛加一個邊後衛, 其中一個中後衛更可以視乎情況靠邊路
原帖由 輝 於 2007-8-2404:40 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
作客試玩3-4-3:icon101:
用依個陣有咩需要注意??:icon064:
你練咩野啊
原帖由 klinskan 於 2007-8-2404:43 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
你練咩野啊
我仲研究緊，我隊波無中場中，但成打winger材料
而家training 練緊passing
原帖由 輝 於 2007-8-2404:47 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
我仲研究緊，我隊波無中場中，但成打winger材料
而家training 練緊passing
睇邊d位既球員年輕d就train邊樣好似會好d, 雖然傳球可以吸引到d大水魚,
但太老兼主技低未必真係成日搵到人買, 最緊要passing要train成4, 5周 :icon101:
train主技咪仲耐時間:icon101:
原帖由 leewaikei23 於 2007-8-2405:06 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
睇邊d位既球員年輕d就train邊樣好似會好d, 雖然傳球可以吸引到d大水魚,
但太老兼主技低未必真係成日搵到人買, 最緊要passing要train成4, 5周 :icon101:
train四五週的意思係?
大約五週後先PA先升一個grade??
Your 20 players
Chen Xuanze http://www81.hattrick.org/Common/images/icons/player/yellow_card.gif
TSI = 600 , 24 years and 1 days, inadequate form
Has poor experience and weak leadership abilities
Stamina:weak Keeper:wretchedPlaymaking:inadequate Passing:weakWinger:solid Defending:poorScoring:weak Set pieces:passable
Emil Darie
TSI = 1 550 , 23 years and 102 days, passable form
Has wretched experience and weak leadership abilities
Stamina:excellent Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:passable Passing:solidWinger:inadequate Defending:disastrousScoring:inadequate Set pieces:solid
Gui Kaihang
TSI = 650 , 24 years and 18 days, inadequate form
Has disastrous experience and weak leadership abilities
Stamina:weak Keeper:wretchedPlaymaking:inadequate Passing:inadequateWinger:inadequate Defending:wretchedScoring:passable Set pieces:weak
Hakem Benaim
TSI = 600 , 22 years and 64 days, inadequate form
Has wretched experience and weak leadership abilities
Stamina:solid Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:weak Passing:weakWinger:passable Defending:inadequateScoring:poor Set pieces:inadequate
He Ruirong
TSI = 0 , 45 years and 41 days, inadequate form
Has solid experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina:wretched Keeper:wretchedPlaymaking:disastrous Passing:wretchedWinger:disastrous Defending:wretchedScoring:wretched Set pieces:disastrous
Ke Guanghong
TSI = 1 400 , 27 years and 59 days, weak form
Has wretched experience and passable leadership abilities
Stamina:solid Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:inadequate Passing:passableWinger:passable Defending:weakScoring:inadequate Set pieces:poor
Lai Junzong
TSI = 230 , 26 years and 46 days, weak form
Has poor experience and passable leadership abilities
Stamina:weak Keeper:wretchedPlaymaking:inadequate Passing:inadequateWinger:wretched Defending:weakScoring:weak Set pieces:weak
Lai Yanzhong
TSI = 300 , 25 years and 97 days, weak form
Has poor experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina:passable Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:inadequate Passing:weakWinger:inadequate Defending:wretchedScoring:wretched Set pieces:poor
Lan Chunyou
TSI = 1 070 , 28 years and 73 days, passable form
Has weak experience and solid leadership abilities
Stamina:weak Keeper:wretchedPlaymaking:poor Passing:inadequateWinger:weak Defending:passableScoring:passable Set pieces:weak
Mark Jackson
TSI = 540 , 24 years and 48 days, passable form
Has poor experience and weak leadership abilities
Stamina:poor Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:solid Passing:wretchedWinger:poor Defending:inadequateScoring:weak Set pieces:wretched
Mei Baoyuan
TSI = 890 , 24 years and 49 days, passable form
Has poor experience and wretched leadership abilities
Stamina:wretched Keeper:wretchedPlaymaking:inadequate Passing:solidWinger:weak Defending:weakScoring:inadequate Set pieces:disastrous
Miao Ziming http://www81.hattrick.org/Common/images/icons/player/yellow_card.gif
TSI = 280 , 25 years and 86 days, passable form
Has wretched experience and inadequate leadership abilities
Stamina:weak Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:wretched Passing:weakWinger:wretched Defending:weakScoring:passable Set pieces:inadequate
Nigel Murray
TSI = 280 , 27 years and 35 days, inadequate form
Has wretched experience and wretched leadership abilities
Stamina:poor Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:poor Passing:poorWinger:poor Defending:weakScoring:passable Set pieces:solid
Pang Shuolun
TSI = 390 , 28 years and 34 days, passable form
Has weak experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina:inadequate Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:inadequate Passing:weakWinger:poor Defending:inadequateScoring:weak Set pieces:wretched
Qasim Mansour
TSI = 640 , 28 years and 104 days, poor form
Has poor experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina:passable Keeper:wretchedPlaymaking:wretched Passing:weakWinger:passable Defending:passableScoring:inadequate Set pieces:passable
Tian Chuankai
TSI = 1 750 , 22 years and 18 days, inadequate form
Has wretched experience and poor leadership abilities
Stamina:poor Keeper:passablePlaymaking:disastrous Passing:disastrousWinger:wretched Defending:disastrousScoring:wretched Set pieces:inadequate
Yiannis Marinadas http://www81.hattrick.org/Common/images/icons/player/injured.gif1
TSI = 560 , 21 years and 0 days, inadequate form
Has disastrous experience and wretched leadership abilities
Stamina:passable Keeper:wretchedPlaymaking:passable Passing:weakWinger:disastrous Defending:passableScoring:poor Set pieces:inadequate
You Zuping
TSI = 540 , 26 years and 90 days, passable form
Has disastrous experience and inadequate leadership abilities
Stamina:inadequate Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:poor Passing:inadequateWinger:passable Defending:inadequateScoring:weak Set pieces:wretched
Zeng Kangci
TSI = 120 , 28 years and 18 days, inadequate form
Has wretched experience and solid leadership abilities
Stamina:inadequate Keeper:wretchedPlaymaking:poor Passing:weakWinger:poor Defending:inadequateScoring:wretched Set pieces:inadequate
Zhang Kangfang
TSI = 690 , 21 years and 12 days, passable form
Has disastrous experience and passable leadership abilities
Stamina:weak Keeper:disastrousPlaymaking:weak Passing:weakWinger:weak Defending:inadequateScoring:passable Set pieces:inadequate
幫手評下:icon101:
Keeper training
Advantages:
- Only two trainees - you will have enough money for a solid coach and some older more experienced outfielders
- Tactical freedom, you can play ANY formations you wish
- Quick cash - you can get reasonable profits within a season which can assist new managers that make mistakes and get into financial trouble.
- Fair prices. Keeper skill can be determined quite well using external tools, so selling a high-solid keeper will usually bring the right price, close to low-excellent. This is not the case with other training types
- Quick pops (base speed 5 weeks)
Disadvantages:
- Lower long term profits compared to some training regimes.
- Slower team strength growth compared to some training regimes (increased defense ratings are not exactly THE thing for winning matches).
Defense training
Advantages:
- Not too expensive trainees
- Good long term profits (generally no big need for any secondary skills)
- Possibility to steal a few points from otherwise superior teams (may be easier to avoid relegation)
- Both Central Defenders and Wing Backs get 100% training so you can train 10 players a week.
Disadvantages:
- Buying 10 trainees of a reasonable standard can be expensive.
- Low tactical variability. For maximum profit, you're stuck with 532 and 541 line ups, or, if you are content with training 9 players, 442 and 451
- Slowest training (base speed 8 weeks)
- Harder to win
Playmaking training
Advantages:
- Easier winning matches as your teams midfield improves
- Good profits.
- Good training speed (base 6.5 weeks)
- 3-5-2 is the main formation for Playmaking training and is probably considered the strongest formation in Hattrick for the majority of matches.
Disadvantages:
- One necessary secondary skill (stamina)
- Other secondary skills required to make the best profit from them (defending, passing, winger).
- Good trainees with secondary skills are expensive.
- Expensive to set up as you need 6 Inner Mid + 4 Winger trainees (Inner Mids get 100% Playmaking training and Wingers get 50%)
Scoring training
advantages:
- Only 6 trainees
- Good training speed (base 6.5 weeks)
- High Attack ratings
Disadvantages:
- Low tactical variability - either 3-4-3 or 4-3-3 are your only choices.
- Good trainees are not cheap as secondary skills are required (passing or winger skill) to make a decent profit on them when they are sold.
- Hard to win with a new team (you'll need strong midfield to profit from good attack ratings)
Winger training - crossing
Advantages:
- Quick training (base speed 4,5-5)
- Cheaper trainees
Disadvantages:
- 4 + 4 trainees (Wingers train at 100% and wingbacks at 50%)
- Lower tactical variability
Winger training - wing attacks
Advantages:
- Higher total effect of training than the previous type
Disadvantages:
- 10 trainees
- No tactical variability, you have to play 343 with only two inner midfielders
- Slower individual player growth
Passing training - short passes
Advantages:
- Will be more and more appreciated by the market
- Quick (base time 5.5-6 weeks)
- Good for offense
Disadvantages:
- Needs a lot of money to buy the required trainees (Passing alone is not a useful skill. You need high primary skills for players to make it worthwhile).
- 16 trainees which are both expensive to buy and will mean a high weekly wage bill.
Set Pieces
Advantages:
- Tactical freedom, whole squad trains
Disadvantages:
- Very expensive to set up. To be effective, you need 50 trainees that also have a reasonable level of main skill as Set Piece skill alone does not make them attractive players to buy.
- Form management - many of the trainees will be in bad form so you'll have to rely on a bit of luck to raise the form before selling them.
- The constant selling and buying of players to train will generally mean that your team has a low Team Spirit which makes it more difficult to win matches.
Stamina
Advantages:
- Whole squad trains
- Quick pops (on average 1.25 weeks base speed)
- Possibly good profits to make on 17yo passable playmaker trainees.
Disadvantages:
- Form problems - most of the team will be playing badly
- Quite expensive to set up (but not as bad as set pieces) as any trainees will need a good level of Playmaking skill.
- The constant selling and buying of players to train will generally mean that your team has a low Team Spirit which makes it more difficult to win matches.
Other training regimes.
There are a few other training regimes such as defensive positions and through passing but, due to the formations you need to play and the time taken for players to train a single level, few managers actually train them
新開隊波咁正:eek2:
原帖由 ~~冬之子~~ 於 2007-8-2405:25 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
新開隊波咁正:eek2:
都買過幾個人ge:icon101:
似外國姓名果四位係簽番來的
[ 本帖最後由 輝 於 2007-8-2405:27 PM 編輯 ]
原帖由 輝 於 2007-8-2405:26 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
都買過幾個人ge:icon101:
似外國姓名果四位係簽番來的
你中場同後衛好似是但傷咁一, 兩件就崩潰咁, 如果你有3, 4十萬可以拎d錢黎買苗針對呢兩個位,
就算唔係train咯個位都起碼有d 及格既後備 :icon101:
用你而家d人腳, 我可能會排 4-3-3, train住邊鋒先 :icon101:
以上純粹個人意見 :icon032:
train兩季gk賺$先:icon032: