原帖由 Reina Tanaka 於 2007-11-1402:46 AM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
教練出得佢點都有佢的用處的...睇球員好唔好唔係單睇數據
搶板的還有新中鋒希望Krstic
以前覺得佢有機會成為不錯的苦工球員,不過見佢咁少板實在有點失望:icon101:
原帖由 Eggio 於 2007-11-1401:30 AM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
但他始終有番咁上下年紀:icon102:
上年籃板還很強的大班今年......:icon088: :icon110: :icon101:
會唔會係戰術問題?:icon101:
原帖由 Reina Tanaka 於 2007-11-1402:46 AM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
教練出得佢點都有佢的用處的...睇球員好唔好唔係單睇數據
搶板的還有新中鋒希望Krstic
佢係有用
唔係無可能有人俾6M一年佢:icon080:
但係佢籃板數字以一個內線球員來說未免太低:icon110:
數字...我覺得籃板係內線球員基本要做的事:icon102:
搶唔番籃板你守到人地幾好都無用:icon101:
Krstic從來都唔見得係好既籃板手,更何况上年先重傷完:icon021: :icon050: :icon024:
原帖由 henrytam 於 2007-11-1402:51 AM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
會唔會係戰術問題?:icon101:
Collins少籃板可以歸功於佢有時直頭只負責卡位
但公牛大班唔搶邊個搶:icon102: :icon101:
公鹿的教練根本能力有限
大部份進攻MO Will,Redd自己來
成日用左十幾秒
一係勉強射左，一係得番幾秒先傳比隊友射外圍
沒有章法同節奏
好唔乾脆
澳洲人二年多又只是做下苦工，駁下腳咁
其實他高低位傳球都有一定水準
易建聯有表現都得靠外圍手風順
令人懷念TJ Ford呢
[ 本帖最後由 李喂凸 於 2007-11-1403:02 AM 編輯 ]
原帖由 henrytam 於 2007-11-1402:50 AM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
以前覺得佢有機會成為不錯的苦工球員,不過見佢咁少板實在有點失望:icon101:
YES...應該仲可以拎多D的...
不過我覺得應該要用多d Krstic
同埋Magloire 應該都好快出返黎吧 :icon102:
Ben Wallace那句我收返:icon101:
原來佢有傷:icon101:
馬大少今日冇出席NYK 訓練, 倒數嗎 :icon124:
睇下今日boston會唔會斷喇:icon101:
原帖由 Hakkinen 於 2007-11-1406:35 AM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
馬大少今日冇出席NYK 訓練, 倒數嗎 :icon124:
希望NY快d買斷佢份約等佢一嘗去意大利打波的心願:( :bye: :icon101:
from espn insider:
Trade No. 1
Marbury, Renaldo Balkman and Fred Jones to Cleveland for Larry Hughes, Anderson Varejao and Damon Jones
The Knicks gain some perimeter defense and add a frontcourt player who can actually play a little defense. The Cavs get a true point guard along with an energy forward, Balkman, to replace Varejao, and they get rid of their $13.65 million obligation to Hughes for the 2009-10 season, allowing them to become major players in free agency the summer before James' contract expires.
Trade No. 2
Marbury, Balkman and Randolph Morris to Sacramento for Ron Artest, Kenny Thomas and Shareef Abdur-Rahim
Knicks fans will be wondering why Mike Bibby isn't in this deal, and the answer is this: If and when the Kings trade Bibby, they'll want a heck of a lot more long-term value than an expiring contract. This deal makes sense for Sacramento because it gets them out from under the $17.3 million they owe Thomas for '08-09 and '09-10 and the $12.8 million they owe Abdur-Rahim over those same two seasons. The Knicks like it because they get Artest without having to surrender David Lee.
Trade No. 3
Marbury, Jared Jeffries, Morris and Mardy Collins to Denver for Kenyon Martin, J.R. Smith, Eduardo Najera and Linas Kleiza
Again, you have to look at the attraction to the Nuggets of being able to get rid of Martin's contract, which pays him $59 million over this season and the next three, while also being able to pair Marbury in the backcourt with Allen Iverson. Smith and Kleiza are both better 3-point shooters than anyone the Knicks have now, and Najera could be subsequently dealt for a serviceable point guard.
Trade No. 4
Marbury, Morris and Jones to Minnesota for Marko Jaric, Theo Ratliff and Mark Madsen
This is about the stupidest trade the Knicks could possibly make, so therefore (based upon their ownership's track record) we cannot unilaterally discount it as a possibility. The Wolves would be ecstatic to get out from under their contract with Jaric, which pays him $6.6 million next season, $7.1 million in '09-10 and $7.6 million in '10-11. They'd also shed the $7.7 million they owe Madsen for the rest of this season and the next two.
.........:icon101: :icon101: :icon101: :icon101: :icon101:
Marbury 你條友唔好搞我Iverson 呀:icon092:
俾t-mac屈機:icon092:
今日milicic打得唔錯:icon101:
原帖由 捷禾@Ajax 於 2007-11-1410:10 AM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
Marbury 你條友唔好搞我Iverson 呀:icon092:
JR,Kleiza,Najera走哂一定入唔到playoffs:icon110: :icon110: :icon110:
第二中鋒咁快復出:eek2:
綠色再一次outplay鬥爛:icon101: :icon101: :icon101:
Seattle 8連敗...:icon110:
如何阻止些路迪:icon059: :icon101:
原帖由 Eggio 於 2007-11-1409:29 AM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
This is about the stupidest trade the Knicks could possibly make, so therefore (based upon their ownership's track record) we cannot unilaterally discount it as a possibility.
:icon8: :icon8: :icon101:
原帖由 Panho17 於 2007-11-1412:27 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/forum/images/common/back.gif
Seattle 8連敗...:icon110:
下場對熱火
希望開齋:icon101: