Raul_Gonzalez 發表於 2008-1-28 02:33:21

原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2008-1-2723:40 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
客觀黎講
我覺得c朗射門機會至少比昆利斯馬多10倍
雖然入球量高但入球效率應該至少起英超倒數頭5名
仲要加埋12碼 罰波 ,用入球數去比較呢2名球員根本完全無意思

而且我唔覺c朗起crossing有咩進步 ,甚至佢根本係已經唔做crossing

大致同意..:icon101:

Eggio 發表於 2008-1-28 02:53:20

原帖由 Raul_Gonzalez 於 2008-1-2802:31 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


於我, 佢近兩季嘅遭遇真係出乎意料..:(
轉錯左去你地度?:icon072:

Raul_Gonzalez 發表於 2008-1-28 02:54:27

原帖由 Eggio 於 2008-1-2802:53 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

轉錯左去你地度?:icon072:

被 HKCM 遺忘嘅我地..:icon101:

TAMTOM 發表於 2008-1-28 02:58:08

原帖由 Eggio 於 2008-1-2802:53 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

轉錯左去你地度?:icon072:
佢去到保頓都無咩機會個下慘:icon101:
至今可以做下Diouf 替補啦

Eggio 發表於 2008-1-28 02:58:43

原帖由 Raul_Gonzalez 於 2008-1-2802:54 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


被 HKCM 遺忘嘅我地..:icon101:
法甲都少講
何况法乙...:icon121: :icon101:

TAMTOM 發表於 2008-1-28 03:01:10

原帖由 Eggio 於 2008-1-2802:58 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

法甲都少講
何况法乙...:icon121: :icon101:
基本上我覺得南特應該算比香港人忘記左 ,根本連報紙都唔會見到佢個名:icon101:

Raul_Gonzalez 發表於 2008-1-28 03:01:48

原帖由 Eggio 於 2008-1-2802:58 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

法甲都少講
何况法乙...:icon121: :icon101:

BTW..

繼00-01之後
皇家馬德里, 南特同拜仁慕尼黑同季贏聯賽冠軍
今季可能重演
唔同嘅當然係南特可能贏嘅係法乙啦
:icon101:

Eggio 發表於 2008-1-28 03:11:31

原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2008-1-2803:01 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

基本上我覺得南特應該算比香港人忘記左 ,根本連報紙都唔會見到佢個名:icon101:
馬會有無開法乙的?:confused: :icon101:

Raul_Gonzalez 發表於 2008-1-28 03:12:53

原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2008-1-2801:10 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

有野心就唔係修夫機教啦:icon101:

:icon075: :icon101: :icon112: :icon082:

TAMTOM 發表於 2008-1-28 03:14:17

原帖由 Eggio 於 2008-1-2803:11 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

馬會有無開法乙的?:confused: :icon101:
:icon075:

Eggio 發表於 2008-1-28 03:17:38

原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2008-1-2803:14 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

:icon075:
咁香港人一定唔會遺忘南特的:mad: :icon101:

[ 本帖最後由 Eggio 於 2008-1-2803:20 AM 編輯 ]

Raul_Gonzalez 發表於 2008-1-28 03:20:07

原帖由 Eggio 於 2008-1-2803:17 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

咁香港人一定唔會遺亡南特的:mad: :icon101:

:icon126: :icon101:

Smithy 發表於 2008-1-28 08:51:03

祖記放走Boumsong後借入Stendardo:icon101:

古都 發表於 2008-1-28 08:52:33

祖記呢排搞咩:icon101:

Dioray 發表於 2008-1-28 14:12:27

木閘又有水魚接收

八百萬鎊過熱刺?周薪65k?

如果以出場率計算,佢周薪應該入全球前十

olepoon 發表於 2008-1-28 16:03:47

Hutton ---> Spurs (9M)

hoyte 發表於 2008-1-28 16:06:56

原帖由 olepoon 於 2008-1-2804:03 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
Hutton ---> Spurs (9M)
詹邦達:(

TAMTOM 發表於 2008-1-28 17:36:17

原帖由 olepoon 於 2008-1-2804:03 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Hutton ---> Spurs (9M)
Spurs 後防正選過左一月後應該同上半季完全唔同曬...:icon101:

TAMTOM 發表於 2008-1-28 17:36:43

原帖由 hoyte 於 2008-1-2804:06 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

詹邦達:(
去維拉啦 ,反正維拉要右閘

Eggio 發表於 2008-1-28 18:49:15

程咬金殺出:icon101: :icon101: :icon101:
Middlesbrough chief executive Keith Lamb claims a third team has agreed a fee for Jonathan Woodgate with reports suggesting it is Arsenal.

Tottenham and Newcastle both made moves for the England defender - who looked to have agreed to join Spurs.

But Lamb confirmed that another, as yet unnamed club, also made a bid for Woodgate.

"We've agreed a fee with Tottenham and as far as I'm aware he went down at the weekend to have a medical and we're just waiting to see," Lamb told Talksport.

"We agreed a fee with Tottenham, Newcastle and another club but we left it up to Jonathan, he could stay or go."

Lamb admitted Boro were willing to let Woodgate leave as they were well in stocked in central defence.

"We've got an abundance of centre-backs and with the emergence of David Wheater and with Robert Huth back and Pogatetz, Gareth felt he could let one of them go."

Sky Sports sources now claim that Arsenal are the rival bidders, and it remains to be seen whether Woodgate is still heading for White Hart Lane.
頁: 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
查看完整版本: 各大聯賽轉會區