當佢今年差唔多拎哂佢可以拎到既野時....
曼聯真係未必留到佢...
或者對於我黎講
一直都覺得c7唔會o係曼聯踢得耐
但呢一刻如果曼聯冇左c7
我真係不敢想像... ...
can't agree more~ i think every mu fan would think the same...
seriously, he has never be a real RED
actually mu can't expect ronny to have another SUPERMAN season like this one, since it's too unheathy to rely on one player, so.. it might not be a bad thing if he leaves and mu get a large sum of money. 原帖由 Vincent_Chan 於 2008-5-1610:53 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
錢曼聯不嬲都有
但問題係買唔買得番c7呢種質素先..
你要明白冇左c7時既曼聯真係....
所以我都係比較鍾意以前個隊曼聯
整體得黎冇左一兩個球員都唔會影響好大...
但如果而家曼聯冇左c7同rooney既話...
雖然話而家 ...
錢方面好難講,而家有美國佬係度唔同以前
而且諗深一層
當初既C7邊似而家咁先
我地自己都小佢唔知幾多獲啦
見到而家曼聯=C7既時候, 我覺得呢個現象真係唔健康
而家呢個打法既曼聯
要既係一個把握力好既前鋒同一個傳送好既中場(如果冇左C7既話)
再諗真d
而家既C7既角色同當時雲佬既角色係唔係有d相似?
果陣我地賣左雲佬之後幾多人睇死我地唔識入波?:icon101:
冇左C7最多係打法上會有改變
我就唔信費sir同卡羅斯會冇哂計(當然, 重組係要時間) 原帖由 anto 於 2008-5-1622:06 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
咁我要拉莫斯+20M好了:icon101:
曼迷偉大到呢..:icon101: 原帖由 Raul_Gonzalez 於 2008-5-1705:26 AM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
曼迷偉大到呢..:icon101:
or simply, c7+saha for st. iker and s.r. :icon101: 原帖由 Kiu 於 2008-5-1701:06 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
can't agree more~ i think every mu fan would think the same...
seriously, he has never be a real RED
actually mu can't expect ronny to have another SUPERMAN season like this one, since it's too unhe ...
可能佢本身個形象唔好...
又見唔到佢話有咩好愛曼聯既行為:icon101: 原帖由 Kiu 於 2008-5-1705:35 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
or simply, c7+saha for st. iker and s.r. :icon101:
笑咗..:icon101: 原帖由 ken809 於 2008-5-1701:25 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
錢方面好難講,而家有美國佬係度唔同以前
而且諗深一層
當初既C7邊似而家咁先
我地自己都小佢唔知幾多獲啦
見到而家曼聯=C7既時候, 我覺得呢個現象真係唔健康
而家呢個打法既曼聯
要既係一個把握力好既前鋒同一個傳 ...
傳送好既中場我地不嬲都有既....
反而我覺得佢地兩個cases有d唔同...
雲佬最後一屆既曼聯完全係攻唔到..
下下禁區已經有一堆人mark住雲佬..
而且個打法完全唔岩佢踢...
但反而而家既曼聯既打法岩哂...
而明顯地當c7冇踢或者態沈既時候...
曼聯真係攻唔入...
所以....
我仍然唔敢想像冇左c7既影響會係點... 原帖由 anto 於 2008-5-1610:06 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
咁我要拉莫斯+20M好了:icon101:
雲尼斯杜萊+羅賓奴/沙維奧拿+20M.............................:blow: 原帖由 Vincent_Chan 於 2008-5-1705:54 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
傳送好既中場我地不嬲都有既....
反而我覺得佢地兩個cases有d唔同...
雲佬最後一屆既曼聯完全係攻唔到..
下下禁區已經有一堆人mark住雲佬..
而且個打法完全唔岩佢踢...
但反而而家既曼聯既打法岩哂...
而明顯地當 ...
其實Cr7 打多一季最好，假設佢羅哂所有野(其實佢都只係差歐聯?:icon101:)
一黎好頭好尾，打多季證明佢仲屈機
二黎下季尾先賣佢走，25歲剛剛好身體機能會有明顯的退化，而佢又有離心......:icon101:
我唔知你或者其他曼聯fans點諗，但我覺得都證明左呢個form成功，面對用佢屈機既招式，到時我想重組多:icon101: 其實係球隊作用上，我一定覺得肥仔>C7，其實用一個有把握力+有速度既前鋒代C7，我覺得可能有個短暫既混亂期，但問題應該無想象中咁大:icon101: :icon101:
[ 本帖最後由 anto 於 2008-5-1712:52 PM 編輯 ] 原帖由 anto 於 2008-5-1712:48 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
其實係球隊作用上，我一定覺得肥仔>C7，其實用一個有把握力+有速度既前鋒代C7，我覺得可能有個短暫既混亂期，但問題應該無想像中咁大:icon101: :icon101: ...
C7只係神級兵器 :icon101: he is devil enough but not red enough:icon101:
50M+ must sell:icon101: 有"合理"既出價唔怕放:icon101: good 原帖由 杰少仔 於 2008-5-1712:57 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
C7只係神級兵器 :icon101:
世足同NBA一樣啦
愈來愈多廿歲頭就乜都齊既妖獸, 老費調教得一個自然可以調第二個 sell him is not a problem, but who should be the next #7?! 原帖由 Keith 於 2008-5-1707:00 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
世足同NBA一樣啦
愈來愈多廿歲頭就乜都齊既妖獸, 老費調教得一個自然可以調第二個
nani嗎:icon101: 感覺上佢就黎俾人睇透
頁:
1
[2]