原帖由 2076 於 2009-8-2711:05 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
2者冇衝突:icon101:
老老77 我一直都想南華輸, 等足總搞返起真正港隊:(
暫時真係要靠羅生D錢喇,足總點搞丫
加返徐德帥,高文...
吳偉超可以踼的話當然要埋
其他未夠班....
原帖由 cavasake 於 2009-8-2808:49 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
加返徐德帥,高文...
吳偉超可以踼的話當然要埋
其他未夠班....
盧均宜林嘉緯:eek2: :eek2:
今日南華早報報導 :icon101:
東亞足協秘書長：可能唔俾錢香港
HK threatened with huge penalty
Reaching regional finals soured by controversy over fielding South China-only side
Hong Kong's progress to the finals of the East Asian Championships was shrouded in controversy last night after questions were asked over the Hong Kong Football Association's (HKFA) decision to send a team featuring only players from South China Football Club. Hong Kong qualified for February's competition in Japan at the expense of World Cup-bound North Korea thanks to a 12-0 thrashing of Guam, but the HKFA now faces the prospect of having to repay around US$200,000 to the organisers, the East Asian Football Federation.
In a letter from the regional federation, general secretary Takeo Okada blasted the HKFA's actions and threatened severe financial repercussions.
"It is still not acceptable that a team consisting of the players belonging to a single club team be recognised as a national A team," the letter said.
"It is the fact that you have debased the value of the championship.
"Therefore, we won't pay your FA, not only the prize money and participation fee, but also the airfare, board and lodging of the team, which must be paid to every participating FA based on the competition's regulations."
The matter will be discussed during the East Asian Football Federation's (EAFF) executive committee meeting in Beijing tomorrow week and, should the decision go against Hong Kong, the FA will be hit hard in the pocket. Hong Kong coach Kim Pan-gon defended the HKFA's decision to select the squad from just one club, saying they "were the best players and they had spent a lot of money to prepare for this competition".
In addition to the US$50,000 awarded for winning the qualifying competition, Hong Kong was also given US$100,000 to prepare the team for the Taiwan-based four-team tournament, while the EAFF could also ask for all event-related costs - estimated at around another US$50,000 - to be reimbursed.
The matter may not end there, however. Should the sponsors of the EAFF's flagship tournament seek compensation from the regional body as a result of Hong Kong's actions, those costs could be passed on to the HKFA.
"Even the Hong Kong national team have a value," Okada told the SCMP. "In the case of the sponsors asking us for compensation, we will pass that on to Hong Kong. We could disqualify them from the competition because it is in the rules but we won't go that far."
The controversy blighted what was a hugely successful day on the field for Hong Kong, who thrashed Guam with a dozen unanswered goals before North Korea struggled to overcome hosts Taiwan 2-1 in the day's second game.
Hong Kong led 6-0 at half-time but struggled in the second half until Joshua Borja was sent off for a second bookable offence, allowing Kim's team to score another six goals.
Chan Siu-ki found the back of the net four times, while Chao Pengfei claimed a hat-trick with Man Pei-tak, Wong Chin-hung, Leung Chun-pong, Poon Yiu-cheuk and Chan Wai-ho the other scorers.
As a result, Hong Kong won the tournament thanks to a vastly superior goal difference and coach Kim - who also doubles up as the head coach of South China - said they did not show a lack of respect.
"Our club have spent a lot of money to buy a lot of good players, all of the best players in Hong Kong," Kim said. "We have spent a lot of money to prepare for this competition. We want to get results.
"We did select an initial squad of 32, but of that 32 we have 18 players here. We only had a short period and the other players are on holiday and they are not ready physically.
"We are prepared, we had an early start. This is not a lack of respect. We have the best players," Kim said.
:icon063: :icon063: :icon063: 我就好想知可以用咩RULE罰
邊個足協有定唔比選晒一間會做代表?
仲講大話用好多錢預備依個比賽:icon101:
原帖由 Jplayer 於 2009-8-2810:13 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
:icon063: :icon063: :icon063: 我就好想知可以用咩RULE罰
邊個足協有定唔比選晒一間會做代表?
AFC 不嬲都好ｘ黑暗 :icon101:
打橫黎行依家野 神 唔敢做 ge AFC 冇話唔敢 :o
原帖由 StupidPhilip 於 2009-8-2809:35 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
今日南華早報報導 :icon101:
東亞足協秘書長：可能唔俾錢香港
HK threatened with huge penalty
Reaching regional finals soured by controversy over fielding South China-only side
Hong Kong's progress to th ...
一早選哂入去, 等人地踢完先出聲
邊到threatened?
We could disqualify them from the competition because it is in the rules but we won't go that far.
...不如講明搶錢算啦:icon101:
宜家先黎唔認數... :icon101:
我以為香港足總都夠爛
點知AFC仲強大:icon101:
原帖由 henrytam 於 2009-8-2812:40 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
我以為香港足總都夠爛
點知AFC仲強大:icon101:
個主席出名黑金:icon101:
真係要罰最多咪罰香港足總重選+香港禁國際賽:icon101:
原帖由 WainSeven 於 2009-8-2812:55 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
真係要罰最多咪罰香港足總重選+香港禁國際賽:icon101:
唔駛咁嚴重亦相信無咁既理據罰到?!
宜家借意唔比獎金你經已當罰左啦... :icon064: :icon101:
原帖由 尹邦美 於 2009-8-2801:36 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
唔駛咁嚴重亦相信無咁既理據罰到?!
宜家借意唔比獎金你經已當罰左啦... :icon064: :icon101:
商業機構干預足總運作
禁賽1年:icon023: :icon023: :icon101:
:eek:
同FIFA上訴啦:icon101:
係東亞足協定亞洲足協?
原帖由 舒利亞 於 2009-8-2812:51 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
都話假如~_~
總之假設個情況係全香港最好既球員就係哂南華
咁我想知大家係咪會都係反對選哂全南華球員:icon101:
ok...我明你既意思
就當你個假設變真
全香港最好波果23個都係哂南華
但一場波最多都係出到11+3個ja wor
就算點玩輪換制都冇可能個個有得出掛
個人認為...出場機會多少都係評定一個球員應否入選代表隊既準則
原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2009-8-2804:16 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
係東亞足協定亞洲足協?
今次係東亞,唔係AFC
不過佢咁玩,香港仲有一招,洛桑體育法庭見:cool: