咁都唔係回傳?!:eek2:
原帖由 麥記 於 2011-8-2802:07 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
利記場波個球證真係好鬼垃圾，回傳用手接都唔吹:icon125: :icon125: :icon125:
我反而想知之後個一球吹咩?Suarez Offside? 龍門球黎架喎
球證點解可以咁廢?
原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2011-8-2802:09 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
我反而想知之後個一球吹咩?Suarez Offside? 龍門球黎架喎
應該係吹佢棚牙哨得滯，如果唔係咁好難有其他原因:o
球證叫咩名?
好彩今場波都冇佢吹死左姐
謝拉特出返係咪要踼盧卡斯個位?
球証廢d 定係果個paul robinson 廢d?:icon061:
原帖由 michaelgiggs 於 2011-8-2802:16 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
球証廢d 定係果個paul robinson 廢d?:icon061:
兩個都英冠水準:icon058:
加歷查ON9
原帖由 michaelgiggs 於 2011-8-2802:16 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
球証廢d 定係果個paul robinson 廢d?:icon061:
PAUL ROBINSON 雙腳飛剷都冇牌
原帖由 Lingling316 於 2011-8-2802:27 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
加歷查ON9
連環送禮 :icon088:
60分鐘D 轉數就低曬,唔太得啦
原帖由 Lingling316 於 2011-8-2802:01 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
lucas passes badly
舊到唔恨
原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2011-8-2802:28 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
60分鐘D 轉數就低曬,唔太得啦
好彩下半場出黎谷果段把握得到咋
唔係嘅話一個唔覺意加力查又黎料 +埋球證 etc. 應該分已失 :icon89:
原帖由 麥記 於 2011-8-2802:31 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
好彩下半場出黎谷果段把握得到咋
唔係嘅話一個唔覺意加力查又黎料 +埋球證 etc. 應該分已失 :icon89:
好多誤傳, 知道3:0 大家都放鬆左 ,但都唔可以咁失準架麻
下一場就2 weeks 後,到時d 人可能好得7788 ,d 新兵黎齊,個陣完整好多.
節錄
In Manchester: "Wenger talks about youth. Fergie just goes and does it."
In London: "We don't need a change in manager, we just need the manager to change."
Either way, both men have always seen investment in youth as their defining managerial traits. And, given that the issue fundamentally boils down to numbers, it's interesting to directly compare their records.
In 25 years at Old Trafford, Ferguson has given 103 young players their debut (for the purposes of clarity, we've included both academy graduates and those signed before the age of 20): that's 4.1 a season. In 15 years at the Emirates, meanwhile, Wenger has blooded 84: that's 5.6 a season.
From those numbers:
• 23% of Ferguson's graduates have played over 30 games for his club; 31% of Wenger's have
• 12% of Ferguson's graduates have played over 100 games for his club; 15% of Wenger's have
• 10% of Ferguson's graduates have played over 200 games for his club; 5% of Wenger's have
• 23% of Ferguson's graduates have succeeded elsewhere in the Premier League or another elite European top flight; 26% of Wenger's have
• 1% of Ferguson's graduates have been sold to a club at Manchester United's level; 7% of Arsenal's have been sold to a club at Arsenal's level
And, perhaps most tellingly:
• 23% of Ferguson's graduates have won medals with his club; 13% of Wenger's have
To a degree, the numbers prove what we already know: Wenger is more likely to initially flood young players into his squad, Ferguson is better at finishing the job - in a few senses. But that also perhaps raises issues about both men's clubs as actual breeding grounds beyond the academies.
When Wenger first arrived at Arsenal, for example, he could neither introduce a nucleus of readymade graduates nor immediately enforce his ideals. Rather, he had to adapt around the existing qualities of that old Highbury core. In the process, though, they all became better players.
The success that mix brought entrusted Wenger with almost total control of the club's playing structure. But it has also meant that, since then, he has altered it so his youth system only produces particular types of players. Famously, Wenger has physical and technical ideals for every position. And the result, effectively, is that Arsenal release a stream of similar prototypes.
Contrast that with Manchester United, where there has always been a huge variety of player styles produced - most notably in this crop. But Ferguson also tends to get the timing of their introduction right. Unlike Arsenal, there's always been a blend of proven winners and potential brilliance - right back to the Double-winning 1995-96 team. Wenger began to forego that complementary mix in 2004. Admittedly, as we've seen with Samir Nasri and Cesc Fabregas, not always by choice.
But then that also raises questions over whether Wenger has created a damaging cycle for himself. Indeed, one of those proven winners - Tony Adams - relays an enlightening story about Wenger's treatment of Lilian Thuram at Monaco. Despite the reputation the defender eventually forged, at first he offered up regular errors.
"It cost them game after game. But he kept him on... and encouraged him and encouraged him. Great for the player. No good for and the team."
History has clearly repeated itself.
But not in every sense. Sunday's match at Old Trafford is likely to be a far cry from the testosterone-fuelled face-offs between men like Patrick Vieira and Roy Keane. Another difference, however, is that - on the evidence of the past seven years, let alone the last 10 months - only one of the teams is likely to reach the kind of level those forerunners once did.
原帖由 Lingling316 於 2011-8-2802:16 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
謝拉特出返係咪要踼盧卡斯個位?
就中堅同右閘啦
反正呢兩個位d人玻璃d
多d出埸機會ma:cool:
原帖由 Roberto Mussi 於 2011-8-2810:45 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
就中堅同右閘啦
反正呢兩個位d人玻璃d
多d出埸機會ma:cool: 重返成名右閘位?
於我, 佢打萬能替補就得
今場又再一次證明卡老二要學識玩波先融入到呢隊利物浦