Eggio 發表於 2004-7-14 18:29:47

可能某隊對佢地所揀既高中中鋒好有信心... :icon110:
個隊波無左個無乜信用既PF,而且隊波既教練唔係好鐘意 用 果 個明星中鋒...... :)
都唔會到高中中鋒打starter,係都到果個季中係一個白痴GM手中trade番黎既center打先la :cool:

Eggio 發表於 2004-7-14 18:40:24

不成功便成仁 :mad:

The Charlotte Observer reported for Wednesday's editions that the Clippers will trade forward Melvin Ely ($1.75 milion) and guard Eddie House ($825,000) to the expansion Charlotte Bobcats for future second-round draft picks.

快艇而家夠$$$比maximum contract高比 :icon032:

射手shooter 發表於 2004-7-14 20:51:32

不成功便成仁 :mad:

The Charlotte Observer reported for Wednesday's editions that the Clippers will trade forward Melvin Ely ($1.75 milion) and guard Eddie House ($825,000) to the expansion Charlotte Bobcats for future second-round draft picks.

快艇而家夠$$$比maximum contract高比 :icon032:

我想...

Kobe留低
Q留低

:(:(

SamiHyyyyyyyia 發表於 2004-7-14 22:08:35

當然未計
好似我幾版前所講
贊奴比利8m
巴利6m
咁就只可以用mid-level exception簽一個大舊佬...

不過簽番保雲就可能得2m....

mid-level即係幾錢 :confused:
唔係真係簽馬龍啊 :icon093:

SamiHyyyyyyyia 發表於 2004-7-14 22:12:05

There could be a hitch in the deal that would send Los Angeles Lakers center Shaquille O'Neal to the Miami Heat, and it's called Lamar Odom.

Insider's Chad Ford wonders if the Lakers leaked word of this potential snag in the Shaq trade to buy time to find out what Kobe Bryant plans to do. Trade kickers are common and shouldn't have surprised L.A.

Ford: Stalling tactic?

Become an Insider
ESPN's Stephen A. Smith has learned there is an issue with Odom's contract that could affect the finalization of the trade to send Shaq to Miami for Odom, Caron Butler, Brian Grant and a first-round pick.


Odom's contract calls for a 15 percent "trade kicker," which means in the case Odom were dealt to another team, he would be due an extra 15 percent on his contract. In this case, that amount would total between $8.5 million and $9.5 million, in addition to the approximate $55 million remaining on Odom's current contract.


Smith reports that the issue does not appear to be a deal-breaker but will require some additional attention to detail. Apparently, the Lakers were not aware of the clause in Odom's contract at the time that they agreed to the trade with Miami.


When reached by phone Tuesday night, the Lakers would not comment on the specifics of the issue.


O'Neal agreed to the trade last Saturday, but it cannot be completed until, at the earliest, Wednesday, when a two-week leaguewide moratorium on trades and free-agent signings expires.


Last season, O'Neal averaged a career-low 21.5 points with 11.5 rebounds and 2.48 blocks. Over 12 seasons, he has averaged 27.1 points, 12.1 rebounds and 2.6 blocks.

Eggio 發表於 2004-7-14 22:14:02

mid-level即係幾錢 :confused:
唔係真係簽馬龍啊 :icon093:
about 5M :icon032:
你得個1,2M簽到郵差仲想點呀 :icon064:

Eggio 發表於 2004-7-14 22:16:40

There could be a hitch in the deal that would send Los Angeles Lakers center Shaquille O'Neal to the Miami Heat, and it's called Lamar Odom.

Insider's Chad Ford wonders if the Lakers leaked word of this potential snag in the Shaq trade to buy time to find out what Kobe Bryant plans to do. Trade kickers are common and shouldn't have surprised L.A.

Ford: Stalling tactic?

Become an Insider
ESPN's Stephen A. Smith has learned there is an issue with Odom's contract that could affect the finalization of the trade to send Shaq to Miami for Odom, Caron Butler, Brian Grant and a first-round pick.


Odom's contract calls for a 15 percent "trade kicker," which means in the case Odom were dealt to another team, he would be due an extra 15 percent on his contract. In this case, that amount would total between $8.5 million and $9.5 million, in addition to the approximate $55 million remaining on Odom's current contract.


Smith reports that the issue does not appear to be a deal-breaker but will require some additional attention to detail. Apparently, the Lakers were not aware of the clause in Odom's contract at the time that they agreed to the trade with Miami.


When reached by phone Tuesday night, the Lakers would not comment on the specifics of the issue.


O'Neal agreed to the trade last Saturday, but it cannot be completed until, at the earliest, Wednesday, when a two-week leaguewide moratorium on trades and free-agent signings expires.


Last season, O'Neal averaged a career-low 21.5 points with 11.5 rebounds and 2.48 blocks. Over 12 seasons, he has averaged 27.1 points, 12.1 rebounds and 2.6 blocks.
好想見到Odom去Lakers打PG :icon065:

SamiHyyyyyyyia 發表於 2004-7-14 22:21:08

about 5M :icon032:
你得個1,2M簽到郵差仲想點呀 :icon064:

雖然我幾憎佢
但依家咁既情況睇黎真係要簽佢 :icon101:
一係簽2年前揀既scola :cool:

Dioray 發表於 2004-7-14 22:22:52

當然未計
好似我幾版前所講
贊奴比利8m
巴利6m
咁就只可以用mid-level exception簽一個大舊佬...

不過簽番保雲就可能得2m....

保雲可以唔計入,因為佢戚馬刺打左超過三年,可以用大鳥條款續約,而不受薪金上限所困。然後再動用約五百萬簽個大個子。不過,咁做就會超過上限。

Dioray 發表於 2004-7-14 22:22:52

當然未計
好似我幾版前所講
贊奴比利8m
巴利6m
咁就只可以用mid-level exception簽一個大舊佬...

不過簽番保雲就可能得2m....

保雲可以唔計入,因為佢戚馬刺打左超過三年,可以用大鳥條款續約,而不受薪金上限所困。然後再動用約五百萬簽個大個子。不過,咁做就會超過上限。

SamiHyyyyyyyia 發表於 2004-7-14 22:26:23

保雲可以唔計入,因為佢戚馬刺打左超過三年,可以用大鳥條款續約,而不受薪金上限所困。然後再動用約五百萬簽個大個子。不過,咁做就會超過上限。

大鳥條款?

Eggio 發表於 2004-7-14 22:27:37

雖然我幾憎佢
但依家咁既情況睇黎真係要簽佢 :icon101:
一係簽2年前揀既scola :cool:
The mailman會唔會再打又係令一個問題啦 :icon032:

Eggio 發表於 2004-7-14 22:28:39

大鳥條款?
Larry Bird Exception :icon032:

不過點計架?? :confused:

Eggio 發表於 2004-7-14 22:31:08

Mavs新中鋒
DJ Ilunga Mbenga(1.6M/2yrs) :)
Avery Johnson will sign a minimum contract :cool:

SamiHyyyyyyyia 發表於 2004-7-14 22:33:35

Mavs新中鋒
DJ Ilunga Mbenga(1.6M/2yrs) :)


何許人也 :confused::icon101:

Dioray 發表於 2004-7-14 22:35:35

Larry Bird Exception :icon032:

不過點計架?? :confused:

當一個球員效力同一隊球隊三年或以上,續約時就可不計入薪金上限之內。舉例,小牛的Nash今年約滿,按薪金上限的規定,已經超過上限的小馬應該不可以續簽Nash。但由於他在小牛已經效力三年,小牛就以高出薪金上限的價碼同佢續約。不過簽約後的薪金,就仍然會計入薪金總額之內。

我的理解就係咁,唔知有無錯。

Penny仔 發表於 2004-7-14 22:37:30

Larry Bird Exception :icon032:

不過點計架?? :confused:
This exception allows teams to exceed the salary cap to re-sign their own free agents, up to the player's maximum salary. The free agent in question must have played for three seasons without being waived or changing teams as a free agent. This means a player can obtain "Bird rights" by playing under three one-year contracts, a single contract of at least three years, or any combination. It also means that when a player is traded, his Bird rights are traded with him, and his new team can use the Bird exception to re-sign him.These contracts can be up to seven years in length.A player can receive 12.5% raises using this exception.This exception is known as the Larry Bird exception because the Celtics were the first team allowed to exceed the cap to keep their own free agent, and the player happened to be Bird.

http://www.fullsportpress.com/salarycapfaq.html

Eggio 發表於 2004-7-14 22:38:17

何許人也 :confused::icon101:
一位係集訓營有好表現既中鋒喎 :)

我肯定佢打C會好過技安 :icon032::icon101:

令外,技安,VC果單交易熱烈洽談中 :icon040::icon040:

Eggio 發表於 2004-7-14 22:42:24

當一個球員效力同一隊球隊三年或以上,續約時就可不計入薪金上限之內。舉例,小牛的Nash今年約滿,按薪金上限的規定,已經超過上限的小馬應該不可以續簽Nash。但由於他在小牛已經效力三年,小牛就以高出薪金上限的價碼同佢續約。不過簽約後的薪金,就仍然會計入薪金總額之內。

我的理解就係咁,唔知有無錯。


This exception allows teams to exceed the salary cap to re-sign their own free agents, up to the player's maximum salary. The free agent in question must have played for three seasons without being waived or changing teams as a free agent. This means a player can obtain "Bird rights" by playing under three one-year contracts, a single contract of at least three years, or any combination. It also means that when a player is traded, his Bird rights are traded with him, and his new team can use the Bird exception to re-sign him.These contracts can be up to seven years in length.A player can receive 12.5% raises using this exception.This exception is known as the Larry Bird exception because the Celtics were the first team allowed to exceed the cap to keep their own free agent, and the player happened to be Bird.

http://www.fullsportpress.com/salarycapfaq.html
Thank you all :icon065:

SamiHyyyyyyyia 發表於 2004-7-14 22:48:01

一位係集訓營有好表現既中鋒喎 :)

我肯定佢打C會好過技安 :icon032::icon101:

令外,技安,VC果單交易熱烈洽談中 :icon040::icon040:

黎表演入樽 :confused::icon101:
頁: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
查看完整版本: 戰場的另一端