捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 18:51:10

AL Econ

Monopoly rent is the cost of running the monopoly if transfer of ownership is available:o

呢句點解:icon091:

Thx for help:o

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 19:00:36

我淨係明:

如果transfer of ownership is available, 咁你如果賣o左間公司, 你就會forgo o左d economic rent.
咁如果我選擇run 間公司, forgo o左o既唔係我o既earning from selling the firm 咩:icon091:點解變o左 d economic rent o既:icon091:

Thx:icon099::icon099:

choy991044 發表於 2005-1-9 20:27:50

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-9 07:00 PM:

咁如果我選擇run 間公司, forgo o左o既唔係我o既earning from selling the firm 咩:icon091:點解 ...


因為如果我出去, 賣價一定要起碼有個rent 個數,我先肯賣
所以, rent is a part of cost

掛,

有錯請指:icon091:

Zero 發表於 2005-1-9 21:32:39

Del

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 22:07:20

Originally posted by choy991044 at 2005-1-9 08:27 PM:



因為如果我出去, 賣價一定要起碼有個rent 個數,我先肯賣
所以, rent is a part of cost

掛,

有錯請指:icon091:
:icon075:

but 點解就會係part of cost:confused:

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 22:07:40

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-9 09:32 PM:
Del
:icon099::icon099:

choy991044 發表於 2005-1-9 22:17:01

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-9 10:07 PM:

:icon075:

but 點解就會係part of cost:confused:

假設我run 間firm 有$ Xrent
有人想買我間firm, 就要出到 at least $X 我先肯放

如果對方肯出多$10 買, TC = $X + $10
so, rent is part of cost

但如果我之前個concept 錯, 呢堆就係廢話:icon101:

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 22:21:29

Originally posted by choy991044 at 2005-1-9 10:17 PM:


假設我run 間firm 有$ Xrent
有人想買我間firm, 就要出到 at least $X 我先肯放

如果對方肯出多$10 買, TC = $X + $10
so, rent is part of cost

但如果我之前個concept 錯, 呢堆就係廢話:icon101:
好似o岩wor 又:o

姐係最緊要係第一個assumption o岩:icon099::icon101:

Zero:icon100::icon101:

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 22:53:42

發覺有d 問題..:o

就算有人出 $ x + 10, 我地o既cost of running the monopoly 係 x + 10, 但係呢個cost 裡面o既x 係人地offer o既price, not 我地o既rent:icon091:

或者咁講, Monopoly rent is the cost of running the monopoly
呢個statment 裡面o既 is 係指金額上o既等於, 而唔係 "係":icon091:

有錯請指:o

簡拿華路 發表於 2005-1-9 23:02:42

賣得間公司
個賣價實包括個 rent

if唔賣, 個 opportunity cost (HVOF) 就係個賣價囉
咁賣價include左個 rent 架嘛

所以一唔賣, rent 就變左cost of continuing the business

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 23:37:14

出動 o左咁多位我終於明:icon099:

唔該哂:icon099:

choy991044 發表於 2005-1-9 23:42:34

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-9 11:37 PM:
出動 o左咁多位我終於明:icon099:

唔該哂:icon099:

咁我係咪則係錯:icon101:

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 23:44:14

Originally posted by choy991044 at 2005-1-9 11:42 PM:


咁我係咪則係錯:icon101:
o岩呀:icon091:

choy991044 發表於 2005-1-9 23:48:21

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-9 11:44 PM:

o岩呀:icon091:

:icon068::icon068:
今次econ 大約rank 14-15/24

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 23:50:50

Originally posted by choy991044 at 2005-1-9 11:48 PM:


:icon068::icon068:
今次econ 大約rank 14-15/24
我係我果間排前果幾個:o

不過出到去同其他班:icon013::icon013:

我o既目標係呢科全級 30名..:icon081::icon101::icon018:

choy991044 發表於 2005-1-9 23:52:22

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-9 11:50 PM:

我係我果間排前果幾個:o

不過出到去同其他班:icon013::icon013:

我o既目標係呢科全級 30名..:icon081::icon101::icon018:

全級幾人:confused:

PS1: 西門家陣勁唔勁?

PS2: 想睇我份卷問西門:icon101:

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-9 23:57:04

Originally posted by choy991044 at 2005-1-9 11:52 PM:


全級幾人:confused:

PS1: 西門家陣勁唔勁?

PS2: 想睇我份卷問西門:icon101:
大概 350:icon101::icon101:
我諗起碼有 >50 個Econ A, 我地d 2AL + 2AS o既班都好d, 大概每班 3個到, 3AL 果d, 我個frd 果班全班 6男有 5個Econ A:icon101::icon013:

所以如果我真係 30 到..:icon101::icon063::icon101::icon101:

Maths 應該幾勁, Econ 果d 唔係好知, 不過我諗佢應該above avg, 不過佢醒就肯定啦:o

份卷難唔難:icon091:

choy991044 發表於 2005-1-9 23:59:47

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-9 11:57 PM:

大概 350:icon101::icon101:
我諗起碼有 >50 個Econ A, 我地d 2AL + 2AS o既班都好d, 大概每班 3個到, 3AL 果d, 我個frd 果班全班 6男有 5個Econ A:icon101::icon013:

所以如果我真係 30 到..:icon101: ...

HSSC 係有d計:icon030:

我就59/120, 全級最高71/120 :icon081:

或者你地會覺得易:icon068:

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2005-1-10 00:03:01

Originally posted by choy991044 at 2005-1-9 11:59 PM:


HSSC 係有d計:icon030:

我就59/120, 全級最高71/120 :icon081:

或者你地會覺得易:icon068:
宿舍d 自修室而家晚晚 2點收果時都full 哂:icon044:


教到Chapter:icon091:

choy991044 發表於 2005-1-10 00:04:46

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-10 12:03 AM:

宿舍d 自修室而家晚晚 2點收果時都full 哂:icon044:


教到Chapter:icon091:
考到 cost & rent :icon091:
頁: [1] 2
查看完整版本: AL Econ