tom 發表於 2005-2-12 01:40:43

Cavenaghi

好唔好ｕｓｅ．

[ Last edited by tom on 12-2-2005 at 01:45 AM ]

cannavavc 發表於 2005-2-12 01:43:43

cavenaghi就好用:icon107::icon101::icon113:

kolo 發表於 2005-2-12 01:44:46

not a high price, but a quality striker. bought him at 12M
he has had double-double figures in scoring and assists

tom 發表於 2005-2-12 01:45:21

tevez,cavenaghi一樣好用？

cannavavc 發表於 2005-2-12 01:51:27

Originally posted by tom at 2005-2-12 01:45:
tevez,cavenaghi一樣好用？
我覺得卡雲全能d囉

kolo 發表於 2005-2-12 01:54:06

cavenaghi has better numbers with important match etc.
i would prefer cavenaghi

J_LiT 發表於 2005-2-12 02:49:51

我覺得tevez好用d喎...

tonyleehl 發表於 2005-2-12 08:49:22

其實佢兩個一齊簡直絕佩la~

一個速度高 --- tevez
一個柱"燈"式 --- caven

互相彌補, 兩個都勁!!

cannavavc 發表於 2005-2-12 09:47:27

Originally posted by tonyleehl at 2005-2-12 08:49:
其實佢兩個一齊簡直絕佩la~

一個速度高 --- tevez
一個柱"燈"式 --- caven

互相彌補, 兩個都勁!!
卡雲都唔慢喎
又扭得

tonyleehl 發表於 2005-2-12 09:51:16

柱"燈"式唔一定慢gei~

cannavavc 發表於 2005-2-12 09:55:45

Originally posted by tonyleehl at 2005-2-12 09:51:
柱"燈"式唔一定慢gei~
又快又扭得又頂得
用卡雲打單箭頭好過...
以前拍過tevez....:icon081:

Tommy 發表於 2005-2-12 10:43:02

Originally posted by kolo at 2005-2-12 01:44 AM:
not a high price, but a quality striker. bought him at 12M
he has had double-double figures in scoring and assists
第二年買一定係8m左右嫁啦:icon075:

mattfans 發表於 2005-2-12 12:50:47

Originally posted by Tommy at 2005-2-12 10:43 AM:

第二年買一定係8m左右嫁啦:icon075:
1月buy just 6.幾m~~:)
不過打左幾場仲未入波,可能未適應~

=LoGo= 發表於 2005-2-12 16:47:52

我個Tevez黎到利物浦唔識入波....

tom 發表於 2005-2-12 17:29:38

09/10比４５ｍ佢唔要．．

Tommy 發表於 2005-2-12 17:36:06

Originally posted by tom at 2005-2-12 05:29 PM:
09/10比４５ｍ佢唔要．．
你俾佢無用嫁喎:icon104:

yesbwai 發表於 2005-2-12 18:45:35

咁如果有卡雲...有tevez..有robinho....點出佢地好?

天使藍 發表於 2005-2-12 19:03:03

tevez omf
羅賓奴同卡雲打箭頭

yesbwai 發表於 2005-2-12 19:15:19

Originally posted by 天使藍 at 12-2-2005 07:03 PM:
tevez omf
羅賓奴同卡雲打箭頭
咁berbatov做唔做到卡雲既野?

天使藍 發表於 2005-2-12 22:03:11

同類型前鋒
頁: [1] 2
查看完整版本: Cavenaghi