Originally posted by 陳星龍 at 2005-2-24 05:57 AM:
小:icon111:
:icon101::icon101:
Originally posted by kawai at 2005-2-24 05:57:
如果係咁
maxi係箭頭定係繼續無箭頭呢:icon101:
中鋒當然踢正前啦..:o
Originally posted by anto at 2005-2-24 05:56 AM:
其實應該多用兩翼，可惜埋晒入中間
其實我唔覺有波o係中間過....
只係見到班紅衫人o係度追住白衫既波.....
有波o係中間既時候...兩翼已經好入....比到佢地都好難過到人
Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-2-24 05:58 AM:
巴賽未追和果段真係慘...練波進攻隊對防守隊咁樣..
我反而充滿信心巴塞會入波 :icon111:
Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-2-24 05:56:
幾大
04-03-84
Originally posted by anto at 2005-2-24 05:58 AM:
:icon101::icon101:
我就唔出聲
廢時真係比屋企人先:icon101:
Originally posted by kawai at 2005-2-24 05:54 AM:
如果唔係泰利
3:1都有呀:icon052: I believe Chelsea will take this game, if Dorgba didn't sent off.
忽然諗起沙基
唔知佢睇 Ac定巴賽呢:icon107:
Originally posted by Vincent_Chan at 2005-2-24 06:00 AM:
其實我唔覺有波o係中間過....
只係見到班紅衫人o係度追住白衫既波.....
有波o係中間既時候...兩翼已經好入....比到佢地都好難過到人
ｄ中場:icon044::icon044:
Originally posted by Barker at 2005-2-24 06:01:
I believe Chelsea will take this game, if Dorgba didn't sent off.
我深信第二張黃牌唔應該俾..
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-2-24 06:02 AM:
我深信第二張黃牌唔應該俾.. I think so, they can only blame the referee now.
Originally posted by Vincent_Chan at 2005-2-24 05:54 AM:
你可以話人地中場迫得好
加上我地中場中不嬲過人能力不足
隊長今場表現失色0左0的
卡路爾未失波前有一球開龍門球斬唔起時,我己心知不妙,結果:icon068:
睇0下次回合點啦:rolleyes:
Originally posted by Hky at 2005-2-24 06:03 AM:
隊長今場表現失色0左0的
卡路爾未失波前有一球開龍門球斬唔起時,我己心知不妙,結果:icon068:
睇0下次回合點啦:rolleyes:
咪一鬼樣:o
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-2-24 06:02:
我深信第二張黃牌唔應該俾..
其實球證角度有少少被擋..華迪斯個反應又咁大...可能就咁影響左佢 judgement
呢個topic兩晚就1000
睇黎2000唔難lu
Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-2-24 06:04:
其實球證角度有少少被擋..華迪斯個反應又咁大...可能就咁影響左佢 judgement
我會吹停,問旁證..
講真,吹還過得去,好正常嘅反應,但係俾牌就要理據充分d囉..
次回合好睇啦
Originally posted by 熱刺#29戴維斯 at 2005-2-24 06:06 AM:
呢個topic兩晚就1000
睇黎2000唔難lu
卡路爾個球都起碼要10頁講:icon101:
Originally posted by 久違 at 2005-2-24 06:08 AM:
卡路爾個球都起碼要10頁講:icon101:
好一個妙傳:icon040:
他x 的卡路爾:o
一睇完場波開o左winning 玩training 射爆佢:o