Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 3-4-05 12:05 AM:
不過我唔知點解會有三十年戰爭 ...
比個關於三十年戰爭既英文site你,幾好幾詳細ga
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/thirty_years_war.htm
Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-4-2 10:19 PM:
睇下你係以咩準則去睇lor...:icon101:
人口:icon101:
Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-4-3 12:26 AM:
簡單地講下The Second Punic War (218-202 BC)..
開頭Hannibal以超卓既戰術,係Italy既戰場上屈機..
即使擁有士兵人數同質素ge優越,Roman既將軍仍然束手無策...
但後來Carthage提供唔到Hannibal所需既補給.. ...
施比奧定漢尼拔勁d
Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 3-4-05 12:05 AM:
同埋我覺得歐洲d帝制怪怪地(相比中國),一個人可以兼任第二個國家既國王
cuz歐洲d皇朝d婚姻好童話
always A國既王子娶B國既公主..
咁當某一國既King死左,又無heir..
咁追番family tree,最近既可能就係第二個country既king or prince..
咁of cuz...
個一個country d nobles同人民有時會唔happy,自己country比第二個King管bor...
就可能會有d nobles走出黎爭往
Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 3-4-05 12:22 AM:
Holy Roman Empire唔係一個國家?:confused:
係一個日耳曼(德國人)既Empire...AD 800成立
可以話同之前既Roman Empire無乜關係..
而成就上亦無Roman Empire咁勁..
但仍然係Europe舉足輕重...
雖然係16 century後積弱..
但仍然捱到180x年先收皮..
之後就到大家熟悉ge German Confederation la..
Originally posted by Sami Hyyyyyyyia at 2005-4-3 12:43 AM:
施比奧定漢尼拔勁d
在戰術上,漢尼拔的包圍x滅戰術是軍事經典,而西比奧的戰術基本上都係學佢.......而漢尼拔都係被李維稱為戰術之父...........但個人認為在外交上,戰略上,西比奧好d,人格亦然,不過漢尼拔都好x勁架..........在意大利十幾年得個2次補給都可以打成咁,無咩邊幾個做到..........而且帶埋大象過阿爾卑斯山都好難架..........
[ Last edited by 天才守門員 on 3-4-2005 at 12:18 PM ]
thx Hacker:icon107:
Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 2005-4-3 12:16 PM:
但個人認為在外交上,戰略上,西比奧好d,人格亦然,不過漢尼拔都好x勁架..........在意大 ...
可唔可以講下佢地人格有咩分別?:confused:
Originally posted by Sami Hyyyyyyyia at 2005-4-3 05:42 PM:
可唔可以講下佢地人格有咩分別?:confused:
西比奧比較寬大為懷,而且對敵對者都無趕盡殺絕,而且性格開朗,好得軍心........
漢尼拔可能報復心重啦.........所以對羅馬人幾差.........經常搶平民的糧食(呢個都係十幾年黎得2次補給都頂到十幾年的原因:icon101:)而佢都得軍心.........不過情況唔同,我唔識形容:icon101:
而且西比奧份人肯信人.........對人真係唔錯......
但漢尼拔用人唯親........
而且在外交上,漢尼拔真係明顯為復仇
西比奧就迦太基無滅絕之心.............(想滅迦太基的,係佢政敵-大加圖)
[ Last edited by 天才守門員 on 3-4-2005 at 06:18 PM ]
Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 3-4-05 12:16 PM:
而且帶埋大象過阿爾卑斯山都好難架
:icon075:
研究歐洲歷史應該由邊度睇起呢:icon091:
Originally posted by Sami Hyyyyyyyia at 4-4-05 12:01 AM:
研究歐洲歷史應該由邊度睇起呢:icon091:
Roman Empire.
Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-4-4 12:28 AM:
Roman Empire.
希臘都係一個選擇,不過比較少資料
Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 4-4-05 01:07 AM:
希臘都係一個選擇,不過比較少資料
你提醒了我:icon065:
anyway..我下年都係會choose多d Medieval 既Modules去讀.. :)
Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-4-2 04:48 AM:
都可以咁話ge...
唔係super power lor...想回復Napoleaon,甚或Francis I 既霸業..就impossible la..
但係話係World powers之一..
就絕不為過..
而家呢個Fourth Republic都係...
不過our topic係Ear ...
而家個個係 fifth republic
fourth 係 1959 (好似)...
個時無左啦...
Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-4-4 12:28 AM:
Roman Empire.
唔係republic 咩
Originally posted by Sami Hyyyyyyyia at 2005-4-4 12:01 AM:
研究歐洲歷史應該由邊度睇起呢:icon091:
你like 既話
minoan 都係好ga~~~
Originally posted by Leeds fans at 2005-4-2 08:58 PM:
其實法國同英國之間點解成日會有衝突既，又百年戰爭果D...
仲有德國同法國以前係乜點既關係？(i mean中古)
好話唔好聽
而家個個british throne 都係法國人....
係 william the conqueror 既後裔:icon101::icon101:
Originally posted by Gianni Rivera at 9-4-05 01:45 AM:
而家個個係 fifth republic
fourth 係 1959 (好似)...
個時無左啦...
多謝指正..
係1958..因為Algeria既獨立戰爭...
當地既right-wing French玩軍事政變..更威脅spread去法國本土
所以d French請De Gaulle重新出山,亦成立Fifth Republic..重埋第一任president添...
[ Last edited by HackerWong on 9-4-2005 at 03:36 AM ]
Originally posted by Gianni Rivera at 9-4-05 01:50 AM:
好話唔好聽
而家個個british throne 都係法國人....
係 william the conqueror 既後裔:icon101::icon101:
無得咁計..
Plantagenet dynasty完左後已經係落番去England血緣 ge families手上
正如我上面所講好多Europe既Royal families都有血緣關係ga la....
+上Norman =/= French...