CE中文
六國論入面~有事例同史例~我覺得兩個例都係事實同歷史~唔明佢點分~:icon110:
好亂:icon101: 好易明咋啵...:eek:
事例:
事實,已發生,冇被記載,對後世無影響...
Eg.我今日食左菜肉包
但如果你話你日記記低左lee件事呢...
但都唔算係史例...因為對後世無影響
史例:
事實,已發生,有被史官記載,對後世有影響
Eg.1997香港回歸祖國
如有錯誤,請指証:icon065::icon101: 史例其實咪又係事例:icon101:
不過史例係歷史咁解 ,唔係既咪事例囉:icon082: 你地兩個上黎呃post ar :o:icon101: Originally posted by 阿爆 at 2005-4-28 06:06 PM:
你地兩個上黎呃post ar :o:icon101:
玩野:icon101: Originally posted by 忍者小靈叮 at 2005-4-28 01:45 PM:
六國論入面~有事例同史例~
我覺得兩個例都係事實同歷史~唔明佢點分~:icon110:
好亂:icon101:
六國論其實全課都係史例:icon032::icon101: Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-4-28 19:33:
六國論其實全課都係史例:icon032::icon101:
你說得對~:icon112: Originally posted by cmh_2002 at 2005-4-28 05:07 PM:
好易明咋啵...:eek:
事例:
事實,已發生,冇被記載,對後世無影響...
Eg.我今日食左菜肉包
咁你話你呢個側夠唔夠說服力:icon101:
史例話明"史",當然係歷史事件
事例就寬鬆d,只要係人所共知既事就得
所以史例必定係事例,事例未必係史例:icon032: Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-4-28 19:35:
咁你話你呢個側夠唔夠說服力:icon101:
史例話明"史",當然係歷史事件
事例就寬鬆d,只要係人所共知既事就得
所以史例必定係事例,事例未必係史例:icon032:
出名就史
唔出名就事:icon101: Originally posted by yuren at 2005-4-28 07:38 PM:
出名就史
唔出名就事:icon101:
可能兩樣都唔係:icon032::icon101: Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-4-28 19:40:
可能兩樣都唔係:icon032::icon101:
想當年我讀本E ja:icon101: Originally posted by yuren at 2005-4-28 07:44 PM:
想當年我讀本E ja:icon101:
B:icon032: Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-4-28 19:48:
B:icon032:
好彩作文B拉到D:icon065: Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-4-28 07:35 PM:
咁你話你呢個側夠唔夠說服力:icon101:
史例話明"史",當然係歷史事件
事例就寬鬆d,只要係人所共知既事就得
所以史例必定係事例,事例未必係史例:icon032:
我個法則易明d嘛...你地果d搞到小叮一頭霧水:icon099::icon101: Originally posted by yuren at 2005-4-28 08:18 PM:
好彩作文B拉到D:icon065:
咁串:icon119::icon101: Originally posted by cmh_2002 at 2005-4-28 08:26 PM:
我個法則易明d嘛...你地果d搞到小叮一頭霧水:icon099::icon101:
指導佢係你既責任:icon101: Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-4-28 08:34 PM:
指導佢係你既責任:icon101:
自己都未搞掂...:icon050::icon101: Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-4-28 20:33:
咁串:icon119::icon101:
我呢個係事例:icon101: Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-4-28 07:48 PM:
B:icon032:
C:icon099: 記得聽呀sir講係好難分..但係用時間遠近黎分架:o