giggs903 發表於 2005-5-23 23:25:41

Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-5-23 11:17 PM:


唔係我想話你
但我真係覺得呢段說話絕對應該收入本板精華……
:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:

講真....nash真係打得搶都係今季一年 o者...咁就可以話佢好過屎塔頓,真係有點兒那個:o

Fantastic 發表於 2005-5-23 23:25:54

Originally posted by Jason Del Piero at 23-5-2005 23:23:

我需要笑嗎?:o:eek::icon101:
看來你們甚少看stockton既比賽:icon086::icon086:

Fantastic 發表於 2005-5-23 23:27:11

Originally posted by giggs903 at 23-5-2005 23:25:

:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:

講真....nash真係打得搶都係今季一年 o者...咁就可以話佢好過屎塔頓,真 ...
我話今季:icon112:

駿次郎 發表於 2005-5-23 23:28:15

John 少射波唔代表佢進攻比nash弱....:icon024:

Fantastic 發表於 2005-5-23 23:28:24

Originally posted by tom at 23-5-2005 23:19:

stockton既assist係好掂
'尋找馬龍式'每次交波專比馬龍

WainSeven 發表於 2005-5-23 23:28:38

請容許我攞o黎做簽名:icon101:

giggs903 發表於 2005-5-23 23:30:33

Originally posted by Fantastic at 2005-5-23 11:25 PM:

看來你們甚少看stockton既比賽:icon086::icon086:
其實我真係少睇佢兩個比賽...所以我唔敢講進攻邊位好d,不過你話佢差nash十條街,真係無乜可能囉:icon092:

WainSeven 發表於 2005-5-23 23:30:34

Originally posted by Fantastic at 2005-5-23 11:28 PM:

'尋找馬龍式'每次交波專比馬龍
咁講o既話spurs 每次都係"尋找鄧肯式"傳球
lakers 王朝時代係"尋找shaq式"傳球tim:icon101:

駿次郎 發表於 2005-5-23 23:31:55

Originally posted by WainSeven at 2005-5-23 23:30:

咁講o既話spurs 每次都係"尋找鄧肯式"傳球
lakers 王朝時代係"尋找shaq式"傳球tim:icon101:
Jordan 唔傳波咁咪好廢....:icon110:

giggs903 發表於 2005-5-23 23:32:21

Originally posted by WainSeven at 2005-5-23 11:28 PM:
請容許我攞o黎做簽名:icon101:
我都想改:icon110::icon101:

Liverman 發表於 2005-5-23 23:33:11

Originally posted by WainSeven at 2005-5-23 11:30 PM:

咁講o既話spurs 每次都係"尋找鄧肯式"傳球
lakers 王朝時代係"尋找shaq式"傳球tim:icon101: 拿殊都有"尋找阿媽式"傳球

giggs903 發表於 2005-5-23 23:34:21

Originally posted by WainSeven at 2005-5-23 11:30 PM:

咁講o既話spurs 每次都係"尋找鄧肯式"傳球
lakers 王朝時代係"尋找shaq式"傳球tim:icon101:
你唔係搵柏加同lakers班二打六同nash比啊:icon086::icon101:

giggs903 發表於 2005-5-23 23:35:00

Originally posted by Liverman at 2005-5-23 11:33 PM:
拿殊都有"尋找阿媽式"傳球
傑特才是皇道:icon112::icon101:

MatthewChor 發表於 2005-5-23 23:36:11

唔可以咁比...

一個真正勁既人...要攻守兼超強...
e+阿媽+nash係絕未做到呢點:o
俾你兩件一場入70分又點....係你度失番80分咪又係:icon071:

睇番Jazz同Suns e+ d分就知:icon101:
雖則話d陣容+打法唔同ar....

但阿媽+nash真係未及得上當時既史+馬:icon110:

WainSeven 發表於 2005-5-23 23:36:52

推論:
因為山貓入面冇可以尋找o既攻擊手
比雲禮特o係咁o既情況下都可以有咁多助攻
因此佢o既傳球技巧才是全NBA第一
什至比史塔頓更強勁
多謝:icon023:







大家唔好掉我雞蛋:icon100::icon101:

Liverman 發表於 2005-5-23 23:37:20

Originally posted by giggs903 at 2005-5-23 11:35 PM:

傑特才是皇道:icon112::icon101: 尋找飛人式

WainSeven 發表於 2005-5-23 23:38:09

Originally posted by Liverman at 2005-5-23 11:33 PM:
拿殊都有"尋找阿媽式"傳球
奇特有"尋找flying object式"傳球:icon032:
呢句認真o既:icon101:

MatthewChor 發表於 2005-5-23 23:38:14

Originally posted by WainSeven at 2005-5-23 11:36 PM:
推論:
因為山貓入面冇可以尋找o既攻擊手
比雲禮特o係咁o既情況下都可以有咁多助攻
因此佢o既傳球技巧才是全NBA第一
什至比史塔頓更強勁
多謝:icon023:







大家唔好掉我雞蛋:icon100::icon101:
佢有Okafor架:icon111:

tom 發表於 2005-5-23 23:38:46

Originally posted by Liverman at 2005-5-23 11:37 PM:
尋找飛人式
兩位,RJ & VC:icon112:

giggs903 發表於 2005-5-23 23:38:55

Originally posted by WainSeven at 2005-5-23 11:36 PM:
推論:
因為山貓入面冇可以尋找o既攻擊手
比雲禮特o係咁o既情況下都可以有咁多助攻
因此佢o既傳球技巧才是全NBA第一
什至比史塔頓更強勁
多謝:icon023:







大家唔好掉我雞蛋:icon100::icon101:
我需要笑嗎?:icon101:
頁: 1 [2] 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Amare+Nash有D似Malone+Stockton