PISTONS 4-3
Originally posted by 熱刺#29戴維斯 at 2005-6-8 12:24 AM:
Spurs 4-2
Piston's back up not as strong as last year,Okur+Williamson...
:icon092:Arroyo:o:icon044:
:icon101: In my view Big Ben is X-Factor
Arroyo真係咁差?:icon085:
Originally posted by Jay at 2005-6-8 12:18 PM:
Arroyo真係咁差?:icon085: 我覺得同隊波格格不入
Originally posted by Hakkinen at 7-6-2005 16:19:
兩隊以防守力以及內線強橫見稱既球隊係決賽相遇,常規賽大家各係主場得勝,激戰難免
太陽冇左小JJ之下,馬刺輕鬆以4-1擊敗太陽,同時仍證明俾大家睇馬刺仍都有能力大打進攻,得分點頗多,後備兵源充足,再加上馬刺比活 ...
match up..有d個人見解
Mohammed攻擊力不高,真係要3次最佳防守球員ben去防?
ben重點對象會係Duncan
至於Bowen防既應該會係Hamilton
Bowen係身高不高既後衛,小前killer
用佢既防守係Prince身上比較浪費
因為主要得分點唔係佢身上,雖然佢有一定3分能力
但係絕對佢係球隊係第3,4進攻點
可唔可以防住Hamilton每場穩定既廿幾分係馬刺成功最大關鍵
Billups投籃能力比唔上Nash完全係錯覺
佢既3分往往係Pistons追平,什至反超前既重要武器
遠至上年對Pacers
近至上場對Heats
Spurs最有隱憂始終係內線
不輪進攻,防守Duncan,穆罕默德都要2打3(Horry頂唔頂到呢個時期既McDyess都好成問題,唔駛講Wallece2人組了)
Pistons取勝關鍵就睇外圍發揮了
Originally posted by 星影 at 2005-6-8 01:32 PM:
match up..有d個人見解
Mohammed攻擊力不高,真係要3次最佳防守球員ben去防?
ben重點對象會係Duncan
至於Bowen防既應該會係Hamilton
Bowen係身高不高既後衛,小前killer
用佢既防守係Prince身上比較浪費
...
基本上同意你既見解
講內線,PISTONS豈止2個華萊士+麥戴斯,
仲有E.金保依個老將都有機會係X-FACTOR(佢既作用可能同ROB有得揮)
DUNCAN係難MARK,不過比PISTONS用咁多人輪流對付,我覺得未必招架得住
而MANU極可能會交比皇子負責凍結~
係防守上,我認為PISTONS略見優勢~
進攻層面上, Pistons得分能力真係唔多穩定, 導致上一round對住Heat險象橫生
Spurs and Pistons的防守能力不容置疑,
然而論進攻的穩定性, 呢一刻Spurs比Pistons優勝
PISTONS:icon090:
支持團體籃球:mad:
Originally posted by 華頓 at 9-6-2005 09:53:
支持團體籃球:mad:
兩隊都幾好teamwork
Originally posted by Fantastic at 2005-6-9 10:55 PM:
兩隊都幾好teamwork
佢可能話支持曬２隊:icon101:
就開波:icon111:
開波喇
6:2 pistons lead~
haha
4 個 turnovers
睇遲一陣者:o 17-6 :eek:
馬刺d players猛比人block shot...:o
Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-6-10 09:40 AM:
睇遲一陣者:o 17-6 :eek: Rasheed好快入局:o:icon065:
GINOBILI 有d心不在焉
好快追番17-20:icon118:
第一節20-17
兩隊fg%都幾3成幾:o