李喂凸 發表於 2005-7-5 02:11:13

Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-7-5 02:06 AM:


你個keyboard無事丫嘛 :icon101::icon110:
唔多明?
錯字多定唔認同佢地型?:icon102:
錯字既打得太快冇check
型既係指服裝型:icon064::icon064:

沉睡的藍 發表於 2005-7-5 02:12:07

Originally posted by 李喂凸 at 2005-7-5 02:08:
販迪生真係似開啟介多
涼介果種冷靜淡定佢表現不出來
但無可否認有錢又靚仔似涼介既

edison都有唔少時間去講理論、教周杰倫d tune車知識既……

沉睡的藍 發表於 2005-7-5 02:12:24

Originally posted by 李喂凸 at 2005-7-5 02:11:

唔多明?
錯字多定唔認同佢地型?:icon102:
錯字既打得太快冇check
型既係指服裝型:icon064::icon064:

錯字唔少~ 哈哈 :icon124::icon124::icon122:

醇萬 發表於 2005-7-5 03:24:47

其實我覺得余文樂個角色要唔要都罷啦...
漫畫入面技術一d都唔好..出左頭幾集...完全無得俾佢發揮..
呀木又搶晒戲..~

仲有同原著唔同...
(1)開頭佢係秋名送送下貨,贏果個係啟介,唔係中里~
(2)京一,拓海,涼介三個未試過同場鍊車~
(3)串呀木係廢物果個唔係evo軍團既人,只係一d"茄喱啡"~
(4)京一同拓海比賽無炒到車~
(5)店長唔係呀木老豆~
(6)呀木真名叫呀樹~

記憶中係咁多啦,都唔知有無記漏~

洛奇 發表於 2005-7-5 12:03:17

Originally posted by WainSeven at 5/7/05 02:01:

純個人猜測
因為時間o既關係涼介同啟介唔可以並存 (你睇余文樂成個打雜咁就知:icon101:)
所以編劇直接將兩個角色二合為一
所以你見到陳冠希演得唔太似涼介係正常的
因為佢係同時將涼介同啟介o既性格特點演緊 ...
所以我幾受劇中既涼介啟介二合一
反而阿樹我就真係討厭到極點
杜汶澤d戲勁誇張又唔好笑
劇中既阿樹又成過扭老豆買玩具既敗家仔咁
漫畫裡面既阿樹最多係有d笨拙,電影裡面既阿樹根本係真心膠:icon088::icon058:

[ Last edited by 洛奇 on 5-7-2005 at 12:20 PM ]

洛奇 發表於 2005-7-5 12:06:25

Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 5/7/05 01:27:
今晚終於睇左
涼介個角色勁討好、勁好人
但我唔明點解……
2. 中里毅見到拓海贏左好似開心到係自己贏左既樣子 :icon124:

依度又係好唐突
唔止中里,根本直情係成個秋名山普天同慶:icon110:

[ Last edited by 洛奇 on 5-7-2005 at 12:21 PM ]

洛奇 發表於 2005-7-5 12:17:07

Originally posted by 醇萬 at 5/7/05 03:24:
其實我覺得余文樂個角色要唔要都罷啦...
漫畫入面技術一d都唔好..出左頭幾集...完全無得俾佢發揮..
呀木又搶晒戲..~

仲有同原著唔同...
(1)開頭佢係秋名送送下貨,贏果個係啟介,唔係中里~
(2)京一,拓海,涼介三個未試過同場鍊車~
(3)串呀木係廢物果個唔係evo軍團既人,只係一d"茄喱啡"~
(4)京一同拓海比賽無炒到車~
(5)店長唔係呀木老豆~
(6)呀木真名叫呀樹~

記憶中係咁多啦,都唔知有無記漏~

要數既話數到聽朝都數唔完
起碼文太叫個仔送豆腐唔係因為痔瘡發作
亦都冇同個店長去夜總會:icon110:
學7狼話齋
當電影係漫畫既平衡世界好過:icon101:

Erlkoing上的KK 發表於 2005-7-5 22:31:12

今日睇左........感覺好似incomplete咁樣....(係咪唔會有續集?)

Saviowen 發表於 2005-7-5 22:53:03

幾好ge...simple story

and..i like jay~^^~

肥仔麟 發表於 2005-7-5 23:05:45

Originally posted by 洛奇 at 2005-7-5 12:17 PM:

要數既話數到聽朝都數唔完
起碼文太叫個仔送豆腐唔係因為痔瘡發作
亦都冇同個店長去夜總會:icon110:
學7狼話齋
當電影係漫畫既平衡世界好過:icon101:
根本無可能要一套港產片跟足原著 (佢彩你都傻)
直頭應該要當一部新既戲睇仲好

但基本上呢套戲可以話係垃圾

WainSeven 發表於 2005-7-6 10:45:11

Originally posted by 洛奇 at 2005-7-5 12:03 PM:

所以我幾受劇中既涼介啟介二合一
反而阿樹我就真係討厭到極點
杜汶澤d戲勁誇張又唔好笑
劇中既阿樹又成過扭老豆買玩具既敗家仔咁
漫畫裡面既阿樹最多係有d笨拙,電影裡面既阿樹根本係真心膠:icon088::icon05 ...
最大問題
我接受唔到杜汶澤係個o岩o岩高中畢業o既後生仔............:icon101::icon101::icon101:

WainSeven 發表於 2005-7-6 10:46:30

Originally posted by 肥仔麟 at 2005-7-5 11:05 PM:

根本無可能要一套港產片跟足原著 (佢彩你都傻)
直頭應該要當一部新既戲睇仲好

但基本上呢套戲可以話係垃圾
我認為好過當年街頭霸王好多:icon032::icon032::icon101:

cmh_2002 發表於 2005-7-6 10:52:12

Originally posted by 醇萬 at 2005-7-5 03:24 AM:
其實我覺得余文樂個角色要唔要都罷啦...
漫畫入面技術一d都唔好..出左頭幾集...完全無得俾佢發揮..
呀木又搶晒戲..~

仲有同原著唔同...
(1)開頭佢係秋名送送下貨,贏果個係啟介,唔係中里~
(2)京一,拓海,涼介 ...
因為女主角都叫阿樹...廢事搞亂...所以叫做阿木姐

洛奇 發表於 2005-7-6 12:37:38

Originally posted by WainSeven at 6/7/05 10:46:

我認為好過當年街頭霸王好多:icon032::icon032::icon101:
鬼佬拍個套:confused:

咁好唔好得過當年成虫套city hunter:icon073:

choy991044 發表於 2005-7-6 19:07:03

Originally posted by WainSeven at 2005-7-6 10:46 AM:

我認為好過當年街頭霸王好多:icon032::icon032::icon101:

:icon101:

Saviowen 發表於 2005-7-6 21:31:39

Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-7-5 01:27 AM:
今晚終於睇左
涼介個角色勁討好、勁好人
但我唔明點解……
1. 京一咁炒法都唔駛死 (部evo就好慘 :icon099:
2. 中里毅見到拓海贏左好似開心到係自己贏左既樣子 :icon124:
3. 鈴木杏樣衰得咁交關…… :icon062 ...


1. agree
2. 我都有諗..應該係因為佢lost左俾拓海, 如果涼介贏左拓海,間接佢就係屎過兩個人, so 拓海贏令佢有一點安慰, lost係正常的
3. 咪就係lor, 不過comic0個個都唔係靚,arm ge!

文迪達 發表於 2005-7-6 22:44:16

Originally posted by 醇萬 at 2005-7-5 03:24 AM:
其實我覺得余文樂個角色要唔要都罷啦...
漫畫入面技術一d都唔好..出左頭幾集...完全無得俾佢發揮..
呀木又搶晒戲..~

仲有同原著唔同...
(1)開頭佢係秋名送送下貨,贏果個係啟介,唔係中里~
(2)京一,拓海,涼介 ...
唔好咁啦~~
玩捉錯處咩:o

加歷查 發表於 2005-7-6 22:49:42

好似話續集愛迪臣做埋涼介 :o
sammi同舒淇做女子二人組

henrytam 發表於 2005-7-6 22:52:16

Originally posted by WainSeven at 2005-7-6 10:46 AM:

我認為好過當年街頭霸王好多:icon032::icon032::icon101:

你講的...
不會是n年前4大天王都有做的那套吧??:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon124:

henrytam 發表於 2005-7-6 22:52:57

Originally posted by 加歷查 at 2005-7-6 10:49 PM:
好似話續集愛迪臣做埋涼介 :o
sammi同舒淇做女子二人組

根據港產片的定律....
續集只會越來越爛....:icon110::icon110::icon110:
頁: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7
查看完整版本: 頭文字d電影版