Originally posted by J_LiT at 2005-7-29 11:42 PM:
其實隻game裡面個個一樣高定無顯示only??
無顯示only
Originally posted by 阿爆 at 2005-7-29 01:56 AM:
對我黎講塔既定義係高大 :icon101::icon101:
我認為頭鎚都要好
仲要識用頭黎set波:icon032:
Originally posted by thomaskung at 2005-7-29 11:10 PM:
真高拿係高....但冇話佢彈跳力驚人wor....:o
邊個話佢彈跳力驚人:confused:
Originally posted by 簡拿華路 at 30-7-2005 02:50 PM:
邊個話佢彈跳力驚人:confused:
Originally posted by simonltk2000 at 2005-7-29 09:49 PM:
fm jan koller jumping 得17......~_~
係strength 果d 好.....都唔知點解.........
唔知讚佢定踩佢:icon062:
Ibr + Torres~~!!!!!
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-7-30 03:35 PM:
唔知讚佢定踩佢:icon062:
好亂, 我唔reply啦都係:icon101:
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-7-30 03:35 PM:
唔知讚佢定踩佢:icon062:
Originally posted by 簡拿華路 at 2005-7-30 07:02 PM:
好亂, 我唔reply啦都係:icon101:
佢既concept 似係 高就 = jumping 都係一定好 .......:icon125::icon086::icon086:
史譚真人都唔夠真高拿跳.......~___~
隻game 又唔見有高度顯示.....搞到真高拿好似高空優勢冇晒 :(.............
santa cruz+cavenagi
Originally posted by 源.京一 at 29-7-2005 11:20 PM:
:o你好似話阿祖都唔算塔wor老兄..
FM大把人高過阿祖...heading好過阿祖....
仲成日用頭助攻...入球....
一個唔多用頭既"塔"...我唔覺得係....:o
高=塔...呢個concept...膚淺左少少....:o
Originally posted by 基維蝦 at 29-7-2005 11:29 PM:
我講緊我果對又平又正丫ma:o
我suggest一對高矮組合ja:o
Originally posted by Keith at 29-7-2005 11:36 PM:
:o諗住有27
仲勁過奧運跳高....:icon101:
Originally posted by 阿爆 at 30-7-2005 01:45 AM:
咁洗唔洗話高過兩米先叫塔ar :o
塔既重點唔係高ma....:icon125::icon086::icon086:
heading好...有高空優勢先算塔....係一個target man既角色...
鍾意上腳既人點可能話係"塔"...:o
Originally posted by goodboy1352 at 31-7-2005 11:29 AM:
santa cruz+cavenagi
santa既finishing低....:icon086:...passing唔高....:icon086:
同埋呢個組合冇一個heading好....:icon075:
Originally posted by simonltk2000 at 31-7-2005 07:31 AM:
史譚真人都唔夠真高拿跳.......~___~
隻game 又唔見有高度顯示.....搞到真高拿好似高空優勢冇晒 :(.............
fm2006可能+入高度....:icon105:
Originally posted by thomaskung at 2005-7-31 15:45:
FM大把人高過阿祖...heading好過阿祖....
仲成日用頭助攻...入球....
一個唔多用頭既"塔"...我唔覺得係....:o
高=塔...呢個concept...膚淺左少少....:o
:o我無話過高=塔wor..:icon101:
阿祖駛鬼玩頭槌
同埋都無咩機會俾佢用:icon101: