古都 發表於 2005-8-18 21:22:50

Originally posted by vieria1 at 2005-8-18 09:21 PM:


你都幾Q wo!:icon082:
英格蘭不嬲都好勁:o
輸1比4唔係讓叫咩呀?

熱刺#29戴維斯 發表於 2005-8-18 21:23:24

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-8-18 09:15 PM:

龍:icon110:
:icon093: 好明顯我唔係想講呢樣啦

Keith 發表於 2005-8-18 21:23:44

Originally posted by robbierebrov11 at 18-8-2005 09:09 PM:


我總覺得泰利好過佢..
泰利下路波冇rio咁靈活

SamiHyyyyyyyia 發表於 2005-8-18 21:24:22

Originally posted by 古都 at 2005-8-18 09:17 PM:
人地英格蘭讓下你姐

我可唔可以話丹麥都係讓緊英格蘭:icon111::icon101:

Blackburn_Owen 發表於 2005-8-18 21:24:38

Originally posted by 熱刺#29戴維斯 at 2005-8-18 21:23:

:icon093: 好明顯我唔係想講呢樣啦
我知丫:icon111:

古都 發表於 2005-8-18 21:25:14

Originally posted by SamiHyyyyyyyia at 2005-8-18 09:24 PM:


我可唔可以話丹麥都係讓緊英格蘭:icon111::icon101:
緊係得啦
點止嬴咁少呀:cool:

Blackburn_Owen 發表於 2005-8-18 21:25:42

Originally posted by Keith at 2005-8-18 21:23:

泰利下路波冇rio咁靈活
我都係 prefer 金寶綠水 than KOF 的 Terry:icon110::icon101:

Keith 發表於 2005-8-18 21:27:03

Originally posted by 古都 at 18-8-2005 09:25 PM:

緊係得啦
點止嬴咁少呀:cool:
:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:
又唔出舒米高, 唔係一球都唔使輸

孫中謝拉特.奧雲 發表於 2005-8-18 21:27:23

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-8-18 21:22:

英格蘭係咪一定要有人造波先打到進攻足球? 哩一點我答你唔到,,,但英格蘭傳統最強的優勢就係兩邊出波有個柱"等"去撞...而家就係有人斬波
不論 gerrard frank db 都係傳波準的人..但問題係英國冇人去衝 ...
peter:icon8:

Blackburn_Owen 發表於 2005-8-18 21:29:10

Originally posted by 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 at 2005-8-18 21:27:

peter:icon8:
唔係呀嗎:icon110:

Keith 發表於 2005-8-18 21:29:10

Originally posted by 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 at 18-8-2005 09:27 PM:

peter:icon8:
peter講到希斯基曉飛嫁:icon101:

Blackburn_Owen 發表於 2005-8-18 21:29:46

Originally posted by Keith at 2005-8-18 21:29:

peter講到希斯基曉飛嫁:icon101:
"拿,哩d就係當打,力的表現喇":icon101:

孫中謝拉特.奧雲 發表於 2005-8-18 21:29:58

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-8-18 21:29:

唔係呀嗎:icon110:
講緊Peter Crouch呀:icon102:

熱刺#29戴維斯 發表於 2005-8-18 21:31:26

Originally posted by 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 at 2005-8-18 09:29 PM:

講緊Peter Crouch呀:icon102:
:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:

Blackburn_Owen 發表於 2005-8-18 21:31:32

Originally posted by Keith at 2005-8-18 21:27:

:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:
又唔出舒米高, 唔係一球都唔使輸
係囉...中場又唔出米高勞特立分波,托夫亭拍加維臣去撞,前線有埋白賴仁勞特立實可以狂炒英格蘭 6:0:icon110:

Keith 發表於 2005-8-18 21:32:27

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 18-8-2005 09:29 PM:

"拿,哩d就係當打,力的表現喇":icon101:
年輕, 當打, 有活力:icon101:

Blackburn_Owen 發表於 2005-8-18 21:32:36

Originally posted by 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 at 2005-8-18 21:29:

講緊Peter Crouch呀:icon102:
狡滑:icon8:

Keith 發表於 2005-8-18 21:33:12

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 18-8-2005 09:32 PM:

狡滑:icon8:
好聽d就係:icon101:

孫中謝拉特.奧雲 發表於 2005-8-18 21:33:31

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-8-18 21:32:

狡滑:icon8:
你講緊柱躉丫嘛:icon102:

Keith 發表於 2005-8-18 21:34:57

Originally posted by 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 at 18-8-2005 09:33 PM:

你講緊柱躉丫嘛:icon102:
:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:
頁: 1 2 [3] 4 5
查看完整版本: 英格蘭敗因