北倫敦之王
發表於 2011-8-22 23:53:38
原帖由 Dioray 於 2011/8/22 23:07 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
雲加被歐足停賽兩場
我已經做好心理準備,聽晚將會係最喜歡的教練帶隊下的阿仙奴的最後一場歐聯了
再見了,帶領眾小兵衝擊歐冠的雲加,未能取得歐冠絕對是遺憾,但不是污點 ...
如果冇左歐冠令雲加走人/醒下我無任歡迎
北倫敦之王
發表於 2011-8-22 23:55:57
原帖由 Dioray 於 2011/8/22 23:18 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
明晚劇本
輸波,歐冠出局,計唔掂數,都係唔買人 (個人認為佢一直唔出手,就係要等歐聯附賽果決定)
唔買人,英超唔夠踢,釆初中游浮沉,偶爾爆一爆贏強隊
季中,都係要買人,急起直追,連爆多場,但最後因為季初失分太多,排第六,無歐聯打
在 ...
好有可能係…
Dioray
發表於 2011-8-22 23:59:10
觀望,其實所有人都在觀望
NARSI在等歐附的結果,雲加也在等,甚至其他球會也在等
萬一阿仙奴打入首圈,買人會相當迫切,其他球會就有肥羊可宰
當然,雲加是否會拚個漁死網破,沒有人說得上
要真正去評論這季的轉會結果,還看周中師傅…丫唔係周中賽果
講野無point的人
發表於 2011-8-23 00:26:23
其實......大家係咪太睇得起烏甸尼斯?:icon101:
Raul_Gonzalez
發表於 2011-8-23 00:39:51
原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2011-8-2300:26 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
其實......大家係咪太睇得起烏甸尼斯?:icon101:
我著眼點
唔係寄望烏甸尼斯殺入歐冠盃分組賽之後再做得d乜
而係阿仙奴有可能頹到要轉踢歐羅巴聯
:icon101:
小妖
發表於 2011-8-23 00:41:32
原帖由 Raul_Gonzalez 於 2011-8-2312:39 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
我著眼點
唔係寄望烏甸尼斯殺入歐冠盃分組賽之後再做得d乜
而係阿仙奴有可能頹到要轉踢歐羅巴聯
:icon101:
轉為波圖mode 在望 :(
又有得威 又可以高價賣人 :(
講野無point的人
發表於 2011-8-23 00:43:04
原帖由 Raul_Gonzalez 於 2011-8-2312:39 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
我著眼點
唔係寄望烏甸尼斯殺入歐冠盃分組賽之後再做得d乜
而係阿仙奴有可能頹到要轉踢歐羅巴聯
:icon101:
阿仙奴唔係衰到要輸俾呢隊烏甸尼斯呀:icon068:
Siu_Boo
發表於 2011-8-23 00:45:31
Wenger and the Board at Loggerheads Exclusive
At Loggerheads? By Eduardo
August 21 2011
According to an unnamed source Arsene Wenger is at loggerheads with the Board over how the transfer budget should be spent. I am not at liberty to name that source, but I believe the information I received explains the current impasse at Arsenal. Before I explain what the differences between them are, let me make it clear that there is a substantial transfer budget that has to not only cover transfer fees but wages of incoming players and contract improvements of those already here.
The Board and Wenger are both in agreement that , to avoid the situation the club has encountered with Clichy and Nasri this summer, star men like Van Persie and Vermaelen and others with only two years left on their contract need to be offered new long term contracts with big pay rises.
And this is where the first difference of opinion has arisen between manager and club,The Board believe that offering to rise a players wage from £60K -£70Ka week to £90K or £100K is more than enough, but Wenger believes that this is not enough, whenCity, Utd and Chelsea are paying their best(£180K - £250K), and that if we want to keep our best players we have to go to the next level, he wants the pay scale risen to £150K for our best.
This brings us neatly on to the next bone of contention between manager and club, the calibre of signing we can make. Both Wenger and the Board agree that to even maintain a top four spot, let alone win the title, several new signings are required.
The Board are willing to pay big transfer fees, as is Wenger (he is not lying when he says he would pay £30M - £40M), it is also where the difference of opinion comes. The Board would willingly meet the transfer fee, but will not meet the sort of wage demands a £30M signings asks for.
Wenger had a four pronged squad plan this summer,
Keep our best players
Buy in top level players to improve the team
Sign young players with big potential
Promote from within
Wenger has done parts 3 and 4. He wanted to do part 1 and 2 byNasri being offered a massive contract so he would stay, and he hoped to persuade Cesc to stay one more year, with not only a new contract but with the calibre of player he signed. Wenger wanted Mata and Benzema, he still wants Hazzard, wages more than anything else are ruling out Mata and Benzema.
The Board had no problem meeting the Juan Mata transfer fee, but once Chelsea let it be known to his agents what they would offer, it blew Arsenal’s contract offer out of the water.We ran into the same situation with Jones and Utd.
People ask why have Arsenal not signed Cahill, Dann or Samba etc, well its simple really, Wenger wants better players, the Board want him to sign the above level of player, as it sits with their wage scale, Arsene wants the next level up, a Subotic, a Hummells, but they come with not only high transfer fees but with massive wage demands.
Wenger would rather not sign a player at all, than sign someone for a big fee who he considers no better than what we have, the board have asked him to reconsider this stance, and that is why Cahill and Dann have been scouted this late in the window, Arsene sees them as not as good as Koscielny, and thinks it is the wrong way to use his budget, he wants better quality for the first 11, the board just want him to make signings to appease the fans.
Wenger had a major discussion with Kroenke and the Board on Members day.He was told in no uncertain terms that Nasri would have to be sold if he did not sign a contract, and between them they came to the decision to let Cesc go for less than his worth. But Wenger fought his corner, and made it clear the sort of player he wants and that our star men have to be given contract that will keep them, as you can not build if every year there is doubts who are staying and who are going.Arsene also reiterated his view that we need top quality players, not just one as good or possibly slightly better, and that these players come at a premium cost and that the club has to go up a level not only on fees but on wages.
Arsene Wenger is a company man, and will not come out with any of this, while under contract, no matter how much flack he takes, and that is why his comments in the media, since the Members day meeting, have been more for the ears of Stan and Ivan than for the fans, he is warning them.He wont’ walk, and it will cost the club dear to sack him, and even more to shut him up if he is sacked, if they thought the deal David Dein struck with Bruce Rioch to keep him quiet was expensive, they will be blown away by what it will take to buy Arsene Wenger’s silence.
Who wins this battle of wills may define not only what happens to Arsenal’s season, but for many seasons to come.
唔係無買人, 係個SALARY CAP 累事
篇野唔知幾成真 :icon110:
Raul_Gonzalez
發表於 2011-8-23 00:47:17
原帖由 小妖 於 2011-8-2300:41 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
轉為波圖mode 在望 :(
又有得威 又可以高價賣人 :(
存疑
:icon101:
Raul_Gonzalez
發表於 2011-8-23 00:48:13
原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2011-8-2300:43 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
阿仙奴唔係衰到要輸俾呢隊烏甸尼斯呀:icon068:
暫時仲係有希望喎
這麼近
衰起上嚟有乜唔可能
:icon101:
cavasake
發表於 2011-8-23 00:57:05
之前阿仙奴...
拎10萬鎊..8萬鎊週薪出來續約都咁痛咁難....
仲點去買而家呢代o既當打球星....
就算唔買新人
最多買到d2,3線 :icon025:
Mari
發表於 2011-8-23 01:01:33
原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2011-8-2312:43 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
阿仙奴唔係衰到要輸俾呢隊烏甸尼斯呀:icon068:
唔知對面係咪要桑治打中堅呢:icon101:
熱刺#29戴維斯
發表於 2011-8-23 01:05:30
原帖由 Siu_Boo 於 2011-8-2312:45 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Wenger and the Board at Loggerheads Exclusive
At Loggerheads? By Eduardo
August 21 2011
According to an unnamed source Arsene Wenger is at loggerheads with the Board over how the transfer budget sh ...
仍然無法解釋 佢唔肯買果d人工唔高但係係球隊需要ge球員
熱刺#29戴維斯
發表於 2011-8-23 01:09:05
原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2011-8-2312:43 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
阿仙奴唔係衰到要輸俾呢隊烏甸尼斯呀:icon068:
冇士氣,乜都可以發生
cym
發表於 2011-8-23 01:18:39
原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2011-8-2312:43 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
阿仙奴唔係衰到要輸俾呢隊烏甸尼斯呀:icon068:
首回合既下半場, 烏甸不乏進球機會
cym
發表於 2011-8-23 01:46:30
原帖由 Siu_Boo 於 2011-8-2312:45 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Wenger and the Board at Loggerheads Exclusive
At Loggerheads? By Eduardo
August 21 2011
According to an unnamed source Arsene Wenger is at loggerheads with the Board over how the transfer budget sh ...
如果係真, 咁阿仙奴個Board明玩雲加
肯出30M,40M買人
但只係肯比90K-100K週薪(重要已經係加左)
咁樣怪不得買來買去都係那些明日之星
而且雲加你又有TASTE, 嫌Cahill, Samba唔夠好
咁只不過係入左死胡同, 雲加你返去巴黎教PSG好過
大把錢洗, 包你爽
Raul_Gonzalez
發表於 2011-8-23 02:20:31
原帖由 cym 於 2011-8-2301:18 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
首回合既下半場, 烏甸不乏進球機會
上半場都起碼夠扳平啦烏迪內斯d餐士
Dioray
發表於 2011-8-23 10:26:50
之前都提過不下一次
所謂的轉會資金其實係咁計
二千萬鎊畀你,唔代表你有二千萬鎊用
假設買返黎係十萬鎊周薪,唔計稅、經理人佣、獎金之類,單計年薪已經洗左五百萬鎊
即係只可以用千五萬買人
如果黎果個係二十萬鎊周薪
就得返一千萬…
畀四千萬你,即係基本上只可以買兩個十萬鎊周薪,而身價係千亙萬鎊以下的人
又或者係二十萬鎊周薪,三千萬鎊身價的人一個
當然,這只是極度簡化會計方法的計算之下
在買人的同時又賣人,情況更複雜
但總之,只要球會一日唔係無限量咁打開荷包(如今季的利記)
買人都要諗過度過
小妖
發表於 2011-8-23 21:20:23
Terms agreed with Manchester City for Nasri
Arsenal can confirm that they have agreed terms for Samir Nasri to move to Manchester City.
The 24-year-old midfielder, who has spent three years with the Gunners, has been omitted from Arsenal's squad which flies to Udinese this afternoon and instead will travel north for a medical.
The move will be subject to Nasri passing a medical and formal registration processes.
Roman8
發表於 2011-8-23 22:07:46
原帖由 cym 於 2011-8-2301:46 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
如果係真, 咁阿仙奴個Board明玩雲加
肯出30M,40M買人
但只係肯比90K-100K週薪(重要已經係加左)
咁樣怪不得買來買去都係那些明日之星
而且雲加你又有TASTE, 嫌Cahill, Samba唔夠好
咁只不過係入左死胡同, 雲加你返 ...
雲加會唔會同你換曬d星走, 嘩, 盤數靚到:icon101: