hehe0114 發表於 2005-9-13 11:43:09

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-9-13 11:42:



問題係點樣渡江?
利用降軍

joekjen 發表於 2005-9-13 12:04:21

Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-13 11:43 AM:

利用降軍


做晒浮屍塞住長江?

阿爆 發表於 2005-9-13 12:57:38

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-9-13 12:04 PM:



做晒浮屍塞住長江?
:icon101:

hehe0114 發表於 2005-9-13 13:58:45

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-9-13 12:04:



做晒浮屍塞住長江?
佢地會用d平民........
咁打完襄陽先渡江又有咩好處

天才守門員 發表於 2005-9-13 16:43:17

Originally posted by 歐石南 at 2005-9-13 03:37 AM:

類似投石機既物體
不是大炮咩:eek2:

joekjen 發表於 2005-9-13 17:30:34

Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-13 01:58 PM:

佢地會用d平民........
咁打完襄陽先渡江又有咩好處



唔係過左河就算,補給點處理?
唔控制長江,宋軍可以憑長江快速打擊沿江據點



先取襄陽可以令到宋軍失去防守上既優勢

hehe0114 發表於 2005-9-13 17:35:30

Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 2005-9-13 16:43:

不是大炮咩:eek2:
果時所謂既火炮係廢既
實際用途係嚇d馬
回回炮反而應該係屬於攻城器既一類

阿sa 發表於 2005-9-14 08:07:43

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-9-13 01:18 AM:
元軍打左襄陽幾年咁耐,一個原因就係建造水軍

而宋軍係開頭包圍既時候係有反包圍同有援軍的,但都不敵元軍
宋室前後進行13次突圍支援呂文煥,但係元軍的封鎖下,只有3次成功

咸淳九年（1273年）1月-2月期間
樊 ...
中央冇派援軍,right?:icon101:

joekjen 發表於 2005-9-14 12:07:35

Originally posted by 阿sa at 2005-9-14 08:07 AM:

中央冇派援軍,right?:icon101:


有,不過死傷慘重

hehe0114 發表於 2005-9-14 13:21:48

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-9-14 12:07:



有,不過死傷慘重
係平原之上對住蒙古真係冇計

TinTin 發表於 2005-9-16 02:48:27

Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-13 08:21 PM:

係平原之上對住蒙古真係冇計

對抗蒙古，必先用水　:icon101:

hehe0114 發表於 2005-9-16 03:11:45

Originally posted by TinTin at 2005-9-16 02:48:


對抗蒙古，必先用水　:icon101:
但係當吸納左d南宋、金既降軍之後劣勢除之而收窄
頁: 1 [2]
查看完整版本: 南宋討論