stephenlion 發表於 2005-10-5 01:16:21

Originally posted by cowred at 2005-10-5 01:13:

呢d臭名黎既......:sacchi:
我話名聲
無話唔係臭名喎:)

stephenlion 發表於 2005-10-5 01:16:49

Originally posted by 國米~魂 at 2005-10-5 01:14:

呢幾年收晒皮 :icon107:
都有出聲
都有權嘛

講野無point的人 發表於 2005-10-5 01:18:18

Originally posted by schmeichel at 2005-10-5 01:09 AM:
但有錢又唔怕蝕錢o既就會大哂
邊個話一定唔會蝕o架:icon110:
可能聽日油王投資失敗,破左產:icon102:
雖然冇乜可能:icon082:

schmeichel 發表於 2005-10-5 01:18:48

Originally posted by stephenlion at 5-10-2005 01:15 AM:

哈哈
你講得cheksea
我唔講得MU架喇...佢咪一樣收購MU返黎

喂講開又講
又邊d老闆..唔計創會既..同父傳子既..係唔從收購而黎??

你當然可以講曼聯,
不過呢個topic 講緊車仔,
你要講曼聯可以另開 topic,
免得 off topic 啦

stephenlion 發表於 2005-10-5 01:19:29

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 2005-10-5 01:18:

邊個話一定唔會蝕o架:icon110:
可能聽日油王投資失敗,破左產:icon102:
雖然冇乜可能:icon082:
再唔係既
被普京收入倉都好大件事喇

schmeichel 發表於 2005-10-5 01:19:54

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 5-10-2005 01:18 AM:

邊個話一定唔會蝕o架:icon110:
可能聽日油王投資失敗,破左產:icon102:
雖然冇乜可能:icon082:

我o既意思係,
佢洗o係車仔o既錢,
o係冇諗過賺得返,
亦唔介意賺唔賺得返,
咁仲唔係大哂?

cowred 發表於 2005-10-5 01:21:16

Originally posted by stephenlion at 2005-10-5 01:11:

i like zola too:) but i like chelsea coz古生...

http://www.u-soccer.com/home/feature/archive/images/issue1/gullit_hoddle.jpg:icon101:

stephenlion 發表於 2005-10-5 01:22:36

Originally posted by schmeichel at 2005-10-5 01:18:


你當然可以講曼聯,
不過呢個topic 講緊車仔,
你要講曼聯可以另開 topic,
免得 off topic 啦
哈
你都答唔到我既問題
咁你既例證都成立唔到喇

人地有$$收購公司，你都要去唔喜歡既話
咁你就唔係從睇波觀點黎講呢件事..咁你都唔該唔好係呢個以睇波觀點到討論事情既版到討論喇

你要以經濟角度去講
可以去學術版

要以普通唔睇波既人既角度黎講
我都唔介意你去閒情版度講囉

schmeichel 發表於 2005-10-5 01:23:06

Originally posted by stephenlion at 5-10-2005 01:19 AM:

再唔係既
被普京收入倉都好大件事喇

唔會啦,
油王已經將佢d 石油事業賣哂比普京,
身家暴漲至千億

stephenlion 發表於 2005-10-5 01:23:09

Originally posted by cowred at 2005-10-5 01:21:


http://www.u-soccer.com/home/feature/archive/images/issue1/gullit_hoddle.jpg:icon101:
正
:)

stephenlion 發表於 2005-10-5 01:23:29

Originally posted by schmeichel at 2005-10-5 01:23:


唔會啦,
油王已經將佢d 石油事業賣哂比普京,
身家暴漲至千億
唔代表d乜

cowred 發表於 2005-10-5 01:23:51

Originally posted by stephenlion at 2005-10-5 01:16:

我話名聲
無話唔係臭名喎:)
:icon113:

stephenlion 發表於 2005-10-5 01:24:47

Originally posted by cowred at 2005-10-5 01:23:

:icon113:
佢要繼續既話
你同佢講住先喇

我聽朝仲要返學..拜

cowred 發表於 2005-10-5 01:25:48

Originally posted by stephenlion at 2005-10-5 01:23:

唔代表d乜
一樣可以收監.....:icon8:

cowred 發表於 2005-10-5 01:26:41

Originally posted by stephenlion at 2005-10-5 01:24:

佢要繼續既話
你同佢講住先喇

我聽朝仲要返學..拜
88~

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-5 01:45:11

Originally posted by cowred at 5-10-05 01:25 AM:

一樣可以收監.....:icon8:

i dont think so... :(

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-5 11:06:36

Originally posted by cowred at 2005-10-5 01:25:

一樣可以收監.....:icon8:

關係已經好好
多數唔會啦

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-5 11:09:56

Originally posted by stephenlion at 2005-10-5 01:22:

哈
你都答唔到我既問題
咁你既例證都成立唔到喇

人地有$$收購公司，你都要去唔喜歡既話
咁你就唔係從睇波觀點黎講呢件事..咁你都唔該唔好係呢個以睇波觀點到討論事情既版到討論喇

你要以經濟角度去講
...

佢根本一直都迴避問題啦 :o

yuren 發表於 2005-10-5 12:40:51

Originally posted by 國米~魂 at 2005-10-5 01:16:

咁你唔中意油王定車仔?
唔中意加拉薩定Man Utd?
:icon112::icon075:

ThShevchenko 發表於 2005-10-6 18:39:20

Originally posted by schmeichel at 5-10-2005 01:09 AM:


目的一定有,
但一定唔係為錢,
所以我第一個post 已經講左,
有錢唔係大哂,
但有錢又唔怕蝕錢o既就會大哂.

如果油王係唔怕蝕錢o既, 佢就唔 employ 簡安, 油王employ 簡安係想車仔營運健全D
頁: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8
查看完整版本: <轉貼>為車路士平反