Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:39 PM:
自己去搵啦, 作為一個球員既支持者, 連佢最光輝係幾時都唔清楚.
其實迪比有今時今日既下期, 你地應該去多謝上任祖記教頭
我搵唔到bor
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:39 PM:
意思說, 你不了解adrian
的確不了解
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:41 PM:
你認為對住米蘭既老人防線, 用兩個唔係走馬而講腳下功夫既人會有用咩....
有用過兩條柱
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:39 PM:
意思說, 你不了解adrian
不及你
Originally posted by CYBASTER at 2005-10-30 21:40:
咁佢有咩針對性部署?:o
你睇返上一page最底既post同另一個講卡比路既topic吧
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:40 PM:
佢既位置唔及adrian, 係一個事實
點唔及法呀又:icon101:
Originally posted by CYBASTER at 2005-10-30 21:41:
有用過兩條柱
對於老人防線, 兩條柱會有用d, 如果對手係費記, 我會認同出兩個9號半
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:40 PM:
佢既位置唔及adrian, 係一個事實
此子花巧野太多
Originally posted by ~~冬之子~~ at 2005-10-30 21:42:
點唔及法呀又:icon101:
adrian既傳, 射, 整體性及防守性, 都係alex之上
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:43 PM:
對於老人防線, 兩條柱會有用d, 如果對手係費記, 我會認同出兩個9號半
咁尋日兩條柱有咩野用?
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:44 PM:
adrian既傳, 射, 整體性及防守性, 都係alex之上
埋門一腳我真係唔覺得佢好喎:icon101::icon101:
Originally posted by 納比 at 2005-10-30 21:41:
的確不了解
我想你好好於國米年代開始留意佢, 你會明白更多
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:44 PM:
adrian既傳, 射, 整體性及防守性, 都係alex之上
但球場智慧以及冷靜卻在ＡＬＥＸ之下
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:44 PM:
adrian既傳, 射, 整體性及防守性, 都係alex之上
傳,射,整體性找都唔覺
防守
兩個都冇乜架啦
Originally posted by CYBASTER at 2005-10-30 21:44:
咁尋日兩條柱有咩野用?
如果尋日d波再做直接d. 兩條柱會更有用, 更有能力既撕破米蘭
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:45 PM:
我想你好好於國米年代開始留意佢, 你會明白更多
已經找不到了
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:46 PM:
如果尋日d波再做直接d. 兩條柱會更有用, 更有能力既撕破米蘭
講就容易
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-10-30 09:46 PM:
如果尋日d波再做直接d. 兩條柱會更有用, 更有能力既撕破米蘭
咁即係卡比路既戰術有問題?
有冇邊度有入球重溫架:icon032:
其實個討論重點係咪唔同
唔係想講佢出場排陣有問題bor
而係佢輸緊 ,套打法嬴唔到時既變陣換人問題