Originally posted by beckham312oo at 2005-11-7 02:00:
中場既分工依然未改善...我到而家都分唔清楚曼聯陣中邊個係傳球者...連打側擊和中間打入去的攻勢都顯得幾混亂...
簡單一句,d 波唔夠清脆利落.......:(
依然唔知係442定433
Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-11-7 01:59 AM:
我睇好佢地打和的
若非那個帶d幸運,和係最合理賽果
Originally posted by 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 at 2005-11-7 01:59:
問題在於:可以點變?
加多少少創造力啦 ,得古裝臣..邊度夠:icon101:
Originally posted by Vincent_Chan at 2005-11-7 01:57 AM:
我只能說如果唔係費查入左球波
曼聯唔會打到咁縮
咁有今場 o既smith佢都守得起:icon101:
Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-11-7 01:58:
3hit combo
1st -- Beautiful:icon040:
2nd -- 勉強了點:icon050:
3rd -- 格硬到呢:icon102:
Originally posted by Vincent_Chan at 2005-11-7 02:00:
其實我希望曼聯球迷真正能明白今場係唔係真係贏得精彩:)
根本就係打士氣波,食魚生粥之嘛
Originally posted by 古都 at 7-11-2005 01:57 AM:
都係果句啦
曼迷唔好因為呢場表現嬴左車仔而感到自滿
曼迷自滿就算啦...
球員唔好因為呢場表現嬴左車仔而感到自滿:icon127:
令我想起米蘭vs祖記
Originally posted by 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 at 2005-11-7 01:59:
仲將火頭剷起哂:icon101:
但冇兩黃一紅:icon032:
Originally posted by giggs903 at 2005-11-7 02:01 AM:
咁有今場 o既smith佢都守得起:icon101:
其實仍然唔覺得佢企位好
只不過車仔球員比時間佢番黎追番個波黎剷
Originally posted by 古都 at 2005-11-7 02:00:
我對一d技術性擊到較有興趣:icon101:
我覺得雖然Chelsea唔係最強,但要技術性擊倒係接近冇可能既事....不過其實妳技術性擊倒係咩意思先~??:icon101:
Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-11-7 02:00:
不如問
點樣令四隻翼操fit返
佢四隻翼fit番既話...英超都幾大鑊..
Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-11-7 02:02 AM:
根本就係打士氣波,食魚生粥之嘛
但係大把人唔係咁睇....
Originally posted by ~~Miguel~~ at 2005-11-7 02:02 AM:
我覺得雖然Chelsea唔係最強,但要技術性擊倒係接近冇可能既事....不過其實妳技術性擊倒係咩意思先~??:icon101:
拜仁 vs 祖記:icon032::icon032:
Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-11-7 02:02:
根本就係打士氣波,食魚生粥之嘛
佢地已經知道自己唔係昔日既班霸
大家救救下...聽日一定比人串到應一應
Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-11-7 02:01 AM:
依然唔知係442定433
442費查打右中場但時時走入中間:o
Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-11-7 02:00:
其實想換佢入黎衝散對手方線姐 ,不過太遲喇
唔係咁做法
無一隊將前鋒數目提升既波會識得入波
00年既荷蘭、過左99年既曼聯都係最佳反面教材
將沙夏、雲佬、sol放晒出黎都係唔會有波入的
Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-11-7 02:01:
我同意...今場後備兵源難得不足夠:icon110:
洛賓同基斯普因傷冇隨隊黎奧脫福:)
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-11-7 02:03 AM:
佢地已經知道自己唔係昔日既班霸
但老費好似唔太知