進攻中場....史奈達好定袓高爾?
宜家用緊曼聯~budget22m~諗住搵人取代史高斯~我睇啱史奈達同袓高爾~
有冇人用過佢兩個?幾年後d能力似唔似球王級架?~
諗過買vdv~但係太貴~
另外仲有考慮過胡仙歷同保積洛夫~卡斯歷同路斯基~
你地用過之後覺得d功用大唔大~能力勁唔勁?
我amc通常後上射門同做影子前鋒~ sneijder better.... 個人喜歡用路斯基多 d
之前用過佢, 幾勁 Originally posted by 天水麒麟兒 at 17-11-2005 19:44:
宜家用緊曼聯~budget22m~
諗住搵人取代史高斯~我睇啱史奈達同袓高爾~
有冇人用過佢兩個?幾年後d能力似唔似球王級架?~
諗過買vdv~但係太貴~
另外仲有考慮過胡仙歷同保積洛夫~卡斯歷同路斯基~
你地用過之 ...
你想amc入波，j cole唔係理想對像:icon032: 史奈達is quite expensive
J.cole will be a very good choice after 1 or 2 year . 我覺得d'alexandro 最勁.. 美斯最好 Originally posted by lowanfai at 17-11-2005 20:52:
我覺得d'alexandro 最勁..
teamwork, workrate:icon125: Originally posted by 雲佬 at 17-11-2005 21:19:
美斯最好
not the best Originally posted by Fantastic at 17-11-2005 09:21 PM:
not the best
仲有邊個好得過佢......唔通會買到細哨咩
同埋細哨都有佢既弱點,就係頭槌太弱 Originally posted by 雲佬 at 17-11-2005 09:40 PM:
仲有邊個好得過佢......唔通會買到細哨咩
同埋細哨都有佢既弱點,就係頭槌太弱
其實咁講...
個個都會有弱點啦...
其實攻中頭槌弱我覺得冇乜問題... Originally posted by 雲佬 at 17-11-2005 09:40 PM:
仲有邊個好得過佢......唔通會買到細哨咩
同埋細哨都有佢既弱點,就係頭槌太弱
大把人好過佢地啦,隻game咁多人.我就唔信冇 其實如果你想買個後上amc又唔係太睇頭球的話普杜斯基係一個唔錯選擇,而且科隆好易降班............入手價都唔會太高
而如果俾我揀我會prefer史奈達多d,j.cole岩打邊線多d~~
[ Last edited by bryantkmk on 17-11-2005 at 09:51 PM ] Originally posted by garyyhk at 17-11-2005 09:44 PM:
其實咁講...
個個都會有弱點啦...
其實攻中頭槌弱我覺得冇乜問題...
佢成日都係後面插上黎搶點頭槌入波,頭槌弱既好大問題,佢冇頭槌既話入球最少打個5折 vilakazi
necati 勁到爆
tuncay 一樣 Originally posted by simonltk2000 at 17-11-2005 11:04 PM:
vilakazi
necati 勁到爆
tuncay 一樣
necati創造力得9打AMC?可能佢呢個數值係random,如果係random既,就唔可以個個save都用啦
端基創造力亦唔係佢強項,打AMC都唔係太適合,何況要佢去取代創造力高,傳波準仲要有tries killer balls often既美斯 史奈達很厉害啊，j我没用过啊，但史奈達打amc，我试过，不是很理想。用他打aml反而更好 Originally posted by drawychen at 18-11-2005 12:05 AM:
史奈達很厉害啊，j我没用过啊，但史奈達打amc，我试过，不是很理想。用他打aml反而更好
年輕有為, 我都試過買佢, 但次次都俾ajax reject... Originally posted by Fantastic at 2005-11-17 21:19:
teamwork, workrate:icon125:
要入波teamwork唔可以太高架:o Originally posted by Reina Tanaka at 18-11-2005 07:40 AM:
要入波teamwork唔可以太高架:o
咁又唔可以一概而論,雲佬teamwork 16都32場正選1場後備入56球
頁:
[1]
2