STAM 發表於 2005-11-20 01:39:25

越睇越覺有腦魔feel..:icon101:

lscrock 發表於 2005-11-20 01:46:40

Originally posted by Teru at 19-11-2005 11:40 PM:
都唔知有乜好拗...
不過見大家都冇咩深度, 膠黎膠去, 同大家又膠下先.

講整隊實力, 應以車路士較高. 先睇三線正選~

前鋒:

前鋒以mu既 雲尼 比 杜奧巴優勝. (雖有crespo, 但 杜奧巴 為 mourinho 至愛)
...
分析得幾好:icon8:

好少人識得分析之餘....又唔會1999咁表達番出黎



ps點解呢度咁多高登術語既

joekjen 發表於 2005-11-20 09:51:52

Originally posted by Fantastic at 2005-11-20 01:07 AM:

足球淨講射門技巧:icon032::icon032:


正常,精華片段都係播入球為主啦:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o

petrchelsea 發表於 2005-11-20 09:52:16

Originally posted by 雲佬 at 20-11-2005 01:05 AM:
睇下曼聯對查爾頓入第2球朗尼既功架,個人突破連過幾關之後仲要用腳面扯個波去遠處,雲佬都不讓朗尼專美,心口控定半車身掛入,網都俾佢射穿咁滯,成個動作連貫性亦都一流,呢d應該係fm先會出現既入球.......林柏特?我諗 ...


你要咁比不如搵下林柏特上年歐聯對拜仁果球波   再搵埋今季對愛華頓果球世界波又搵埋對布力般果場既free kick      
e d 球點都射得靚過執雞掛?

TinTin 發表於 2005-11-20 10:48:35

Originally posted by STAM at 2005-11-19 08:39 AM:
越睇越覺有腦魔feel..:icon101:

可能條友同腦魔一樣係火星過黎住

咁多人講果D 唔 re

攞果個 NBA 上腦果個黎 re

咪有得還擊 law :icon101:

ChelseaDuff 發表於 2005-11-20 13:13:43

Originally posted by petrchelsea at 20-11-2005 09:52 AM:



你要咁比不如搵下林柏特上年歐聯對拜仁果球波   再搵埋今季對愛華頓果球世界波又搵埋對布力般果場既free kick      
e d 球點都射得靚過執雞掛?
:icon8::icon8:

water_long 發表於 2005-11-20 14:04:48

Originally posted by STAM at 20-11-2005 01:39:
越睇越覺有腦魔feel..:icon101: 佢已經可以做腦魔三世:icon101:

joekjen 發表於 2005-11-20 14:16:14

Originally posted by water_long at 2005-11-20 02:04 PM:
佢已經可以做腦魔三世:icon101:


咁一世係邊個:icon101:

water_long 發表於 2005-11-20 14:27:26

Originally posted by joekjen at 20-11-2005 14:16:



咁一世係邊個:icon101: 問二世囉:icon101:

ecyy2005 發表於 2005-11-20 15:31:12

奇積又再出現啦......曼聯唔需要摩連奴...!!!!

Tung 發表於 2005-11-20 23:48:30

Originally posted by 紐記* at 2005-11-20 01:20 AM:

不如叫雲佬,雞虫踢中場睇下有冇林伯咁勁
雞虫..
yr word is so bad:icon9:

ivansclo 發表於 2005-11-21 19:48:32

Originally posted by petrchelsea at 20-11-2005 09:52 AM:



你要咁比不如搵下林柏特上年歐聯對拜仁果球波   再搵埋今季對愛華頓果球世界波又搵埋對布力般果場既free kick      
e d 球點都射得靚過執雞掛?


:icon075::icon075: 我相信就算球王都會入d好雞既波 ... 以一兩個入球例子來反證某球員射唔射得似乎太過武斷 ...

不過, 以林伯既位置來看, 佢既入球數字係好勁 ... :icon8:

devil_raymond 發表於 2005-11-21 19:58:34

Originally posted by ivansclo at 21-11-2005 07:48 PM:



:icon075::icon075: 我相信就算球王都會入d好雞既波 ... 以一兩個入球例子來反證某球員射唔射得似乎太過武斷 ...

不過, 以林伯既位置來看, 佢既入球數字係好勁 ... :icon8:

係前鋒太廢先顯得佢勁:icon107::icon107::icon107:
Crespo+Drogba(9 goals)< 林伯(10 goals)

【劍心】 發表於 2005-11-21 20:09:30

Originally posted by devil_raymond at 21-11-2005 07:58 PM:


係前鋒太廢先顯得佢勁:icon107::icon107::icon107:
Crespo+Drogba(9 goals)< 林伯(10 goals)

入唔到波唔等於前鋒廢,真高拿入咁少波,佢叫唔叫廢?根本係場上既功用都唔同,用入球黎判斷一個前鋒價值,會唔會膚淺左D呢?

2plus 發表於 2005-11-21 20:39:20

係我心目中真高拿打nba可能勁過踼波

joekjen 發表於 2005-11-21 20:50:19

Originally posted by 2plus at 2005-11-21 08:39 PM:
係我心目中真高拿打nba可能勁過踼波


he is 202cm tall only,many nba player taller than him:icon101:

petrchelsea 發表於 2005-11-21 21:06:08

Originally posted by ivansclo at 21-11-2005 07:48 PM:



:icon075::icon075: 我相信就算球王都會入d好雞既波 ... 以一兩個入球例子來反證某球員射唔射得似乎太過武斷 ...

不過, 以林伯既位置來看, 佢既入球數字係好勁 ... :icon8:

我講緊佢既可觀性姐 :icon051:

petrchelsea 發表於 2005-11-21 21:12:46

Originally posted by devil_raymond at 21-11-2005 07:58 PM:


係前鋒太廢先顯得佢勁:icon107::icon107::icon107:
Crespo+Drogba(9 goals)< 林伯(10 goals)

杜奧巴開季到而家都有5,6個助功:icon051:
況且球隊係講求整體性   睇下車仔入波數字多你1.5倍就知發生緊咩事啦:icon051:

Zainin 發表於 2005-11-21 21:38:51

Originally posted by jose_mourinho at 20-11-2005 12:56 AM:
差d miss左呢個咁精彩既post...

我用呢個名會唔會敏感左d...?
我都差 d miss 左哩個topic,

好出奇, 就咁睇個名, 覺得哩個topic 應該冇乜討論價值 ...

估唔到咁精彩呀, 笑左我好耐 ... 抵佢唔沉 ...

jose_mourinho 發表於 2005-11-22 00:25:33

Originally posted by Zainin at 21-11-2005 09:38 PM:

我都差 d miss 左哩個topic,

好出奇, 就咁睇個名, 覺得哩個topic 應該冇乜討論價值 ...

估唔到咁精彩呀, 笑左我好耐 ... 抵佢唔沉 ...

冇錯, 好好笑...
頁: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
查看完整版本: 摩連奴教曼聯!!