Originally posted by leung_kenneth at 2005-12-10 08:00:
唔夠打milan正選?
我唔覺得喎...
唔通個個都要好似buffon咁先可以打milan?
呢個世界有幾多個buffon? :icon092:
何況如果abbiati唔足夠打milan正選...
我唔覺得dida都唔會夠...
仲有3年o既後備生涯 ...
仲有岩布仙尼:icon041:
Originally posted by 沙基 at 9-12-2005 07:43 PM:
你又在說笑嗎, 定係說教
我想我比你了解米蘭
"符唔符合米蘭的要求"好主觀ge野黎ga wo
無得measure ga wo
觀點與角度je
唔認同人家的意見就要話人說笑嗎
Originally posted by Brian at 2005-12-10 22:22:
"符唔符合米蘭的要求"好主觀ge野黎ga wo
無得measure ga wo
觀點與角度je
唔認同人家的意見就要話人說笑嗎
我在說的是米蘭國際分裂的宗旨, 亦係貝佬同光頭佬係97年所講既事
如果你係唔清楚既, 自己去check
Originally posted by 沙基 at 10-12-2005 10:28 PM:
我在說的是米蘭國際分裂的宗旨, 亦係貝佬同光頭佬係97年所講既事
如果你係唔清楚既, 自己去check
你都get 唔到我個point ge
我唔敢質疑你對ac 的熟識ar
只係對於一d 無得measure ge 野
yo man 唔係1+1=2 咁簡單ma
好多野無得話係就係ga ma
你覺得係je 人地未必覺得ga wo
你唔同意 就話人說笑la
Originally posted by grandoni at 2005-12-10 11:50 AM:
仲有岩布仙尼:icon041:
:icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099: :icon099:
:icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041: :icon041:
Originally posted by Brian at 2005-12-10 22:35:
你都get 唔到我個point ge
我唔敢質疑你對ac 的熟識ar
只係對於一d 無得measure ge 野
yo man 唔係1+1=2 咁簡單ma
好多野無得話係就係ga ma
你覺得係je 人地未必覺得ga wo
你唔同意 就話人說笑la
你自己有冇留意架, 講緊既係數字人話符合Milan 既要求
我相信我會清楚過國米迷囉. 講米蘭既要求既話.
我諗米蘭既宗旨係一就一, 係二就二, 唔會係咁複雜呱
如果想同我討論, 先睇晒成個topic, 攪埋d資料, 做足功課先黎同我討論
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-12-10 11:49 PM:
你自己有冇留意架, 講緊既係數字人話符合Milan 既要求
我相信我會清楚過國米迷囉. 講米蘭既要求既話.
我諗米蘭既宗旨係一就一, 係二就二, 唔會係咁複雜呱
如果想同我討論, 先睇晒成個topic, 攪埋d資料, 做足 ...
基哥... 好心同佢講清楚D啦...
佢都唔明...
Originally posted by ~~冬之子~~ at 9-12-2005 23:40:
咁不如買聖伊卡啦:icon062:
卡斯拿斯?? :icon124:
諗諗下
發覺
希迪布蘭點解一直冇人買
Originally posted by 沙基 at 10-12-2005 11:49 PM:
你自己有冇留意架, 講緊既係數字人話符合Milan 既要求
我相信我會清楚過國米迷囉. 講米蘭既要求既話.
我諗米蘭既宗旨係一就一, 係二就二, 唔會係咁複雜呱
如果想同我討論, 先睇晒成個topic, 攪埋d資料, 做足 ...
man
maybe u again misunderstand what i mean
我係講梗你ge attitdue
係唔係一就一 二就二又係你覺得ga ja
Originally posted by leung_kenneth at 2005-12-11 00:33:
基哥... 好心同佢講清楚D啦...
佢都唔明...
二佬, 天氣冷了, 留多一點氣暖肚吧...
一個真真正正既米蘭迷, 自然會有共同的思想
Originally posted by Brian at 2005-12-11 02:22:
man
maybe u again misunderstand what i mean
我係講梗你ge attitdue
係唔係一就一 二就二又係你覺得ga ja
唔通要我講, 你呢d真係高見, 等我今晚返去反醒左, 再去研究點解事實唔係跟住你的方向呀.
這是我嗎?
Originally posted by 沙基 at 11-12-2005 02:25 AM:
唔通要我講, 你呢d真係高見, 等我今晚返去反醒左, 再去研究點解事實唔係跟住你的方向呀.
這是我嗎?
sorry wo
無打算要你咁做喎
補充d 野問下你專家la
米蘭精神係想多用本地人
咁除咗國藉之外
能力仲駛唔駛考慮？
無錯本地唔本地係一就一 二就二
但對能力的觀感係唔係一就一 二就二咁簡單？
Originally posted by Brian at 2005-12-11 02:28:
sorry wo
無打算要你咁做喎
補充d 野問下你專家la
米蘭精神係想多用本地人
咁除咗國藉之外
能力仲駛唔駛考慮？
無錯本地唔本地係一就一 二就二
但對能力的觀感係唔係一就一 二就二咁簡單？
你有沒有看過當年的迪達, 當年的艾比亞迪????
如果冇睇過, 睇返先講~
迪達係usa94之後已經係巴西第一人, 但可惜佢既表現, 要搵返泰法路出黎把關. 就算泰法路退出國家隊, 都係馬高斯. 迪達係正式為米蘭打既第一年, 仍然都係上三路甩手, 一個冇角度, 冇力度既地波, 仍然係迪達一聲咁過左佢.
而家我地一直講緊既係安先生當年用一個根本連艾比亞迪都不如既人出任米蘭正選, 簡接令艾比有今天的下場
Originally posted by Brian at 2005-12-11 02:28 AM:
sorry wo
無打算要你咁做喎
補充d 野問下你專家la
米蘭精神係想多用本地人
咁除咗國藉之外
能力仲駛唔駛考慮？
無錯本地唔本地係一就一 二就二
但對能力的觀感係唔係一就一 二就二咁簡單？
呵... 考慮能力又點?
abbiati好失禮咩?
Originally posted by 沙基 at 11-12-2005 02:39 AM:
你有沒有看過當年的迪達, 當年的艾比亞迪????
如果冇睇過, 睇返先講~
迪達係usa94之後已經係巴西第一人, 但可惜佢既表現, 要搵返泰法路出黎把關. 就算泰法路退出國家隊, 都係馬高斯. 迪達係正式為米蘭打既第一 ...
Originally posted by leung_kenneth at 11-12-2005 02:41 AM:
呵... 考慮能力又點?
abbiati好失禮咩?
i am not discussing their ability 我係講梗
數字人有佢ge諗法
除國藉外
要考慮能力
咁能力ge 野好主觀
人家有人家諗法
why要 話人說笑or說教？
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-12-11 02:39 AM:
你有沒有看過當年的迪達, 當年的艾比亞迪????
如果冇睇過, 睇返先講~
迪達係usa94之後已經係巴西第一人, 但可惜佢既表現, 要搵返泰法路出黎把關. 就算泰法路退出國家隊, 都係馬高斯. 迪達係正式為米蘭打既第一 ...
個人認為...
佢用依家(應該係早兩年)top fit o既dida同早兩年"dull"踎o既abbiati比...
根本無得比...
我唔否認dida係唔錯...
但如果兩個都top fit...
o係我心目... 兩個都算係同一級數...
兩個都唔算最好一級...
但代表ac都不失禮...
我唔代表沙基講o野...
但我自己就真係覺得ac唔應該用巴西人...
無錯... 係講緊國籍問題...
能力不相伯仲... 唔講國籍...
講人工咩?
ac有abbiati...
點解仲要用dida?
球會呢3年間又俾o左幾多機會abbiati?
呢一年... 好開心abbiati決定離開ac...
好開心abbiati o係juventus証明o左D o野...
Originally posted by Brian at 2005-12-11 02:51 AM:
i am not discussing their ability 我係講梗
數字人有佢ge諗法
除國藉外
要考慮能力
咁能力ge 野好主觀
人家有人家諗法
why要 話人說笑or說教？
我估基哥o既意思應該係...
叫佢睇多D ac比賽先...
其實... 能力... 主觀客觀因素斬有o既...
如果當年重用艾比
咁而家係咪會變左要替迪達不值?
我寧願爭論究竟古迪仙尼仲留唔留係車仔好
Abbiati當年不是因為在某一場歐聯犯錯而導致米蘭出局嗎