yes~i get this
但實際上有咩用架?
:icon101:標示返２者唔同
ｃｅ無ａｌ先有 Originally posted by 源．京一 at 2005-12-12 10:14 PM:
:icon101:標示返２者唔同
ｃｅ無ａｌ先有
ce都有架:icon101: Originally posted by 基維蝦 at 2005-12-12 11:22 PM:
ce都有架:icon101:
有架咩?:icon124:
ce可以有2個balance?:o
唔好意思 我廢:icon101: Originally posted by 2076 at 2005-12-12 11:35 PM:
有架咩?:icon124:
ce可以有2個balance?:o
唔好意思 我廢:icon101:
my book hv:icon101: Originally posted by yuren at 2005-12-12 09:54 PM:
下面~~debtors' ledger control account
cash received from debtors DR Bank CR Control
cash paid in respect of a credit balance on a debtors' ledger accountDR Debotrs Control CR Bank
credit balance on debtors' ledger accountCR Debtor Originally posted by 基維蝦 at 2005-12-12 23:22:
ce都有架:icon101:
:icon101:死,我未見過 Originally posted by 源．京一 at 2005-12-13 12:04 AM:
:icon101:死,我未見過
難怪我既...
中4,5本PA書打開過都唔知有無5次:icon101: Originally posted by 2076 at 2005-12-13 00:08:
難怪我既...
中4,5本PA書打開過都唔知有無5次:icon101:
因為學校用notes??:icon101: Originally posted by 基維蝦 at 2005-12-12 23:51:
cash received from debtors DR Bank CR Control
thx...
但
cash received from debtors 要cr debtors ledger control
咁
cheques received for bills receivable 又唔駛既? trial balance
Interest on debentures, half year to 30 June 2005
咁P/L果度係咪要計兩次?(即係全年):confused: Originally posted by yuren at 2005-12-13 05:44 PM:
trial balance
Interest on debentures, half year to 30 June 2005
咁P/L果度係咪要計兩次?(即係全年):confused:
yes Originally posted by yuren at 2005-12-13 10:31 AM:
thx...
但
cash received from debtors 要cr debtors ledger control
咁
cheques received for bills receivable 又唔駛既?
因為唔會影響Debtor's Balance
Dr Bank
Cr Bill Receivable
Debtor筆數一早清左. Originally posted by Zero at 2005-12-14 13:35:
因為唔會影響Debtor's Balance
Dr Bank
Cr Bill Receivable
Debtor筆數一早清左.
但receivable唔係話 筆數未收架咩?
定係因為筆數未收...所以對debtors control無影響/? 又問
debenture interest應該係 P/L 既expenses
但如果:
An accrual needs to be made in relation to debenture interest.
係咪唔用less debenture interest
但要加 accruals?
而balance sheet就應該入current liabilities -> accrual
???
但我答案係
無debenture interest
無accrual
但有b/s 既 current liabilities - accrual
係咪因為"needs to be"
未proceed
所以P/L唔用計落expenses呢?
:confused: Originally posted by yuren at 2005-12-14 03:15 PM:
但receivable唔係話 筆數未收架咩?
定係因為筆數未收...所以對debtors control無影響/?
佢係話cheque recevied for bills receviable,即係話之前已經有bills receviable呢個數..而家果debtors settle返...
頁:
1
[2]