連拿 or 卻克蘭??
邊個好d呢.......半斤八兩:icon127: 連拿for sure
卻克蘭 always injury 卻克蘭 performance is better. 我個Reina成身上身喎,勁近D波都救到... my save computer use 卻克蘭 wo~~ 卻克蘭勁就勁d,但平穩.必入波都係救唔到.但連拿就上身多D,必入波都有可能救到 卻克蘭係咪成日傷??
我個韋斯達維特應該唔續約
要買個門將 Originally posted by kk_22 at 12-12-2005 11:22 AM:
卻克蘭 performance is better.
連拿 always make mistake. 我次次同利物浦打,
連拿都超勁0既...
笠佢都接到=.= Originally posted by 【劍心】 at 12-12-2005 08:10 PM:
卻克蘭勁就勁d,但平穩.必入波都係救唔到.但連拿就上身多D,必入波都有可能救到
下
是嗎?我未用過
但我只係試過用曼聯作客晏菲路
轟入連拿六球~~ 我個連拿唔穩定喎,
卻克蘭好用D我覺得 卻克蘭好用D both play very well for me
but riena can sell for 20m(to arsenal) and kirkland cant
keep kirkland and sell riena!!!!!!!! Originally posted by lfcnz at 13-12-2005 05:16 PM:
both play very well for me
but riena can sell for 20m(to arsenal) and kirkland cant
keep kirkland and sell riena!!!!!!!!
oh i sold him to arsenal for only 6.75m:eek: Originally posted by 小劍 at 2005-12-13 11:46 AM:
下
是嗎?我未用過
但我只係試過用曼聯作客晏菲路
轟入連拿六球~~
咁唔代表d乜 Originally posted by 小劍 at 13-12-2005 11:46 AM:
下
是嗎?我未用過
但我只係試過用曼聯作客晏菲路
轟入連拿六球~~
人玩點都好過電腦架啦:icon110: Support 土炮:icon8: Originally posted by 【劍心】 at 13-12-2005 07:22 PM:
人玩點都好過電腦架啦:icon110:
咁又係
高見 卻克蘭勁d 克蘭唔係好識佢..有冇photo?
or比英文我
頁:
[1]
2