中堅可以諗下邦利拿之類:icon091:
但係意甲球員可能好難適應??
原帖由 中場指揮官 於 2005-12-2108:27 PM 發表
唔覺辛達路斯好差.:o 不過有d怯場囉...
原帖由 Liverman 於 2005-12-2109:16 PM 發表
不過有d怯場囉...
ok啦,話晒都只係20歲仔.
頭鎚,攔截都唔錯.
係速度慢d,同埋傳波冇準.
路斯基:eek2:
條中場線打全攻:eek2:
原帖由 基維蝦 於 2005-12-2108:32 PM 發表
中堅可以諗下邦利拿之類:icon091:
但係意甲球員可能好難適應??
個節奏太快...:icon092:
原帖由 Zero 於 2005-12-2105:44 PM 發表
門將唔係問題.
列文而家已經三十六啦
其實都應該搵定接班人頂佢的位
雖然施文都可以打到四十歲
但係如果太遲搵未必搵到適合人選喎
Arsenal's loss to Chelsea stemmed on the following areas:
1. Toure and Lauren were both placed out of their usual positions. Toure always plays the right centreback and Lauren the right back. Toure found it very difficult to check the speedy Robben. He could not keep up with Robben's pace and let in the first goal. Lauren simply could not master his left foot so J.Cole had successfully stole the ball and scored Chelsea's second goal
2. Arsenal's midfield was extremely poor in terms of defence. Frabregas and Flemini were both spectators on the pitch. They did not make any solid tackles that could drive Chelsea's midfield trio, Makalele, Essin and Lampard away
3. their attack was equally ineffective. It was not until Chelsea had 4 goal attempts before Arsenal made their first attack in the first half. Both Hleb and Lyungberg did everything they could to look for scoring opportunities but they could only find Henry there with 2-3 Chelsea defenders always surrounding him. Van Persia never seemed to have the appetite to enter Chelsea's penalty area
Wenger should put Toure and Lauren back to their usual position and leave out the aging Sol Campbell. He simply lacks the pace to combat the Chelsea forwards. Arsenal could have lost by an even bigger margin if Sanderos did not play excellently. He had covered a lot of leaks by Campbell and Toure. Hleb should play in the playmaker's role with Lyungberg on the right, Reyes (or Peres) on the left midfield. Frabregas should play deeper to help 2 centrebacks. Bergkamp should partner Henry upfront with the latter as the target man to pass the ball. He can hold the ball tight, look for teammates like Henry, Hleb, Lyungberg and co to move into a scoring position, and even shoot at will himself.
i can't wait to watch their matches against Real Madrid.
原帖由 ~~冬之子~~ 於 2005-12-2208:30 AM 發表
路斯基:eek2:
條中場線打全攻:eek2:
佢可能會同Helb一樣 , 腳都未上到就比人鏟到非起 ~:icon094:
原帖由 snowsman 於 2005-12-2202:15 PM 發表
列文而家已經三十六啦
其實都應該搵定接班人頂佢的位
雖然施文都可以打到四十歲
但係如果太遲搵未必搵到適合人選喎
泰萊
原帖由 122775369 於 2005-12-2206:02 PM 發表
佢可能會同Helb一樣 , 腳都未上到就比人鏟到非起 ~:icon094:
一出場即傷:(
原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2005-12-2211:02 PM 發表
泰萊
放走左:icon003:
原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2005-12-2211:02 PM 發表
泰萊
亞蒙尼亞都唔錯ar
原帖由 SoundofSilence 於 2005-12-2203:39 PM 發表
Arsenal's loss to Chelsea stemmed on the following areas:
1. Toure and Lauren were both placed out of their usual positions. Toure always plays the right centreback and Lauren the right back. To ...
我諗用羅倫打左閘係因為艾殊利同基治都傷o左,冇人用先出此下策?
如果你話辛達路斯拍托尼打中堅會好,我睇又未必,蘇金寶活力係差D,但係佢有寶貴o既經驗.
前面拍金確係進攻o既泉源,但係以佢o既年齡做主力太勉強.皮利斯都係,體能日差.要睇下雷耶斯,希比同雲偑斯接唔接到捧.佢地都有天份,但係就欠火候,可惜亨利除o左扮有型同扮大佬之外,都教唔到佢地D乜 o野.亨利絕對係一個頂級球員,但佢唔係領軍之才,足球智慧亦都不足.
之前睇過一個外國球迷講,阿仙奴需要一個識tackle o既人,都幾有道理,法比加斯係好有天份o既 playmaker,不過要佢承擔埋中場防守工作就太辛苦,買入一個純防中係比較真接o既方法.
原帖由 PENNYDIOR 於 2005-12-2311:04 AM 發表
我諗用羅倫打左閘係因為艾殊利同基治都傷o左,冇人用先出此下策?
如果你話辛達路斯拍托尼打中堅會好,我睇又未必,蘇金寶活力係差D,但係佢有寶貴o既經驗.
前面拍金確係進攻o既泉源,但係以佢o既年齡做主力太 ...
zokora:icon124:
原帖由 SamiHyyyyyyyia 於 2005-12-2311:20 AM 發表
zokora:icon124: diarra:icon126:
只要降班就會得到解脫了
:icon122::icon122::icon122:
都冇錢....
阿仙奴呢兩三年都要韜光養晦
大家唔駛諗太多
等法比、雲佩斯、希比、雷耶斯幾個成熟到好似早幾年既龍保同皮利斯咁獨當一面既時候
你地自然可以重新起飛
原帖由 沉睡的藍 於 2005-12-2306:40 PM 發表
阿仙奴呢兩三年都要韜光養晦
大家唔駛諗太多
等法比、雲佩斯、希比、雷耶斯幾個成熟到好似早幾年既龍保同皮利斯咁獨當一面既時候
你地自然可以重新起飛
希望管理層有耐性等啦......
阿仙奴起碼仲有個隊形同鬥心,唔同mu......
其實我覺得希比打已經打得唔錯, 可以彌補唔出柏金既不足
但與其講佢未夾到阿仙奴既踢法, 我反而覺得係其他人配合唔到佢
猶其係亨利, 成日好似要人個波比佢, 等佢做波咁...
一月最好買個tackle唔錯既, 最好就有埋長射啦, 雖然難搵d
搵個新人拍住gilberto, 唔好出cesc 住...
等A.cole 出番果陣, 陣容就幾完整, 有機會砌落皇馬
最多買個中堅, 或右閘... 唔想再見到C巾...
&唔想再見到羅倫係閘位出現......
[ 本帖最後由 Siu_Boo 於 2005-12-2311:12 PM 編輯 ]