論壇 › 世界足球版 › 大家認為足球比賽可以像籃球一樣睇playback嗎?

george_5002 發表於 2006-4-25 13:14:53

it is feasible, but i do not support~~~:icon092:
:icon021:

ivansclo 發表於 2006-4-25 13:35:35

如果用 replay 呢個系統, 不如再進一步全部用 censor 仲好 ....

george_5002 發表於 2006-4-25 20:17:49

做得"replay", 一定要即時核查suspected area 及immediate 糾正 wrongness 先有用....
如此一定越拖越長.... 每隊每場一次叫replay就可行小小....
replay 最大用途只係睇有goal from suspectible offside~~

I think 判錯係足球最unique o既特點.... wrong judgement already part of the game.... :o

Bilo 發表於 2006-4-25 20:33:59

原帖由 george_5002 於 2006-4-2508:17 PM 發表
做得"replay", 一定要即時核查suspected area 及immediate 糾正 wrongness 先有用....
如此一定越拖越長.... 每隊每場一次叫replay就可行小小....
replay 最大用途只係睇有goal from suspectible off ...


I think FIFA always say " I think 判錯係足球最unique o既特點.... wrong judgement already part of the game..." but they donn't think anything to improve the judge...

george_5002 發表於 2006-4-25 20:37:08

原帖由 Bilo 於 2006-4-2508:33 PM 發表



I think FIFA always say " I think 判錯係足球最unique o既特點.... wrong judgement already part of the game..." but they donn't think anything to improve the judge...

Yes... ar.... 之前話加gal line 前 censor, 加asst. referee 都 ban~~~

But... 有冤枉o野先至可以俾人講足幾十年.... :icon118:

Bilo 發表於 2006-4-25 21:41:18

原帖由 george_5002 於 2006-4-2508:37 PM 發表


Yes... ar.... 之前話加gal line 前 censor, 加asst. referee 都 ban~~~

But... 有冤枉o野先至可以俾人講足幾十年.... :icon118:

FIFA want more classic moment / game in coming football history, haha.

:icon121:

講野無point的人 發表於 2006-4-25 22:37:40

咁一場波要睇幾耐?:icon012:

肥仔麟 發表於 2006-4-25 23:57:59

原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2006-4-2510:37 PM 發表
咁一場波要睇幾耐?:icon012:
如果下下都可以睇
一場波3個鐘喇 :icon101:

射手shooter 發表於 2006-4-26 00:07:19

當然絕對可以睇playback

不過個個球場都裝野d支出入邊個數:icon101:

倒不如加多兩個旁證仲好,不過更多爭拗:icon101:

講野無point的人 發表於 2006-4-26 00:23:10

原帖由 射手shooter 於 2006-4-2612:07 AM 發表
當然絕對可以睇playback

不過個個球場都裝野d支出入邊個數:icon101:

倒不如加多兩個旁證仲好,不過更多爭拗:icon101:
陣間一個旁證話有越位,一個又話冇,咁點算?:icon101:

tsubasa 發表於 2006-4-26 03:46:23

有playback球證誤判可能仲多左

joekjen 發表於 2006-4-26 05:55:54

不如搵機械人踢/做球證,咁一定唔會錯啦

Hakkinen 發表於 2006-4-26 07:51:00

12碼replay既可能性最高,因為球賽已經停左:o

george_5002 發表於 2006-4-26 10:00:15

原帖由 講野無point的人 於 2006-4-2612:23 AM 發表

陣間一個旁證話有越位,一個又話冇,咁點算?:icon101:

play "Rock, scissor, cloth" lor~~ :icon124:

娛樂大亨 發表於 2006-4-26 13:54:28

原帖由 Hakkinen 於 2006-4-2607:51 AM 發表
12碼replay既可能性最高,因為球賽已經停左:o
粗暴攔截都可以

george_5002 發表於 2006-4-26 14:00:54

I think replay should only applied to those "objective" issue like suspectible goal from offside, ball thorugh goal line.... something like that.....

For tackle, hand ball in penalty area, it involve subjective judgement, even if you playback for many times, arguement still continued~~ :icon087:

捷克NeVeD子彈 發表於 2006-4-26 19:53:30

原帖由 Hakkinen 於 2006-4-2607:51 AM 發表
12碼replay既可能性最高,因為球賽已經停左:o

咁有時真係剷中又冇吹罰,咁球賽咪冇停囉,咁又點:icon101:

Manu super fans 發表於 2006-4-26 20:08:09

入球個d可以即時睇playback, 好似NBA last shot support ruling先繼入lor~:)

Gianni Rivera 發表於 2006-4-26 21:09:56

I dont think that the judgement of the referee can be that casual.

It does not only affect the entertainment of football fans,
the glory of a player,

but the prospect of a company
we all know football is all about money now.
millions of dollars, like...European cup, the relegation, promotion, while some decision making like offlside, penalty, foul are going to affect the result.

Dont you think that when considering such important matters, some more serious precaution in protecting the clubs, investors or owners of the club should be needed?

I would think depreiving sb of his money due to the mistakes of sb, which may be prevented, is not too fair.

[ 本帖最後由 Gianni Rivera 於 2006-4-2609:11 PM 編輯 ]

roy1220 發表於 2006-4-26 21:52:05

如果類似犯規就停
但並非犯規,另一方可能失去一個反擊機會
而一直以來足球的規例不斷更新
是希望令球賽更流暢(如回傳不能用手接)
這麼一來playback是不是破壞了流暢性嗎?

查看完整版本: 大家認為足球比賽可以像籃球一樣睇playback嗎?