依加既希斯基都值5.5m....
Wigan's £5.5m Heskey bid acceptedhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wigan_athletic/5154218.stm
Wigan are set to break their transfer record after a £5.5m bid for Birmingham striker Emile Heskey was accepted.
A statement on Blues' website confirmed the offer had been agreed for the 28-year-old former England player, who is now discussing personal terms.
Wigan manager Paul Jewell also inquired about signing Robbie Savage, 31, from Blackburn but was told the Wales midfielder was not for sale.
Jewell said the club were targeting "top Premiership performers".
Wigan are desperate to land a proven striker after selling Jason Roberts to blackburn for £3m and missing out in the chase for Andrew Johnson, who joined Everton from Crystal Palace in May.
Their previous record transfer fee was the £3.1m paid to Wolves for Henri Camara last summer.
Jewell said: "Emile is a proven performer at Premiership and international level and we have made what we consider to be a very good offer to Birmingham City.
"It is not normal for this club to comment on targets until the player has signed but in this instance it's an open secret that we've made the bid.
"I think he's a player who could do very well for us but we'll see how the situation develops.
"I'm still very confident we will get the five or six new players we want by the beginning of the season."
唔係ma,仲要break 埋 Wigan transfer record:icon101::icon101:
Jewell said: "Emile is a proven performer at Premiership and international level "...........:icon081::icon081::icon081::icon081: 好!! 伯明翰真係多得你唔少咯 原帖由 朗尼 於 2006-7-703:35 AM 發表
Jewell said: "Emile is a proven performer at Premiership and international level "...........
佢真係proven過:icon066::icon066::icon066:
......
不過係幾年前....:icon101::icon101::icon101:
估唔到之後走樣:icon099::icon099::icon099: 佢都仲值5.5............. 原帖由 messi30 於 2006-7-711:37 AM 發表
佢都仲值5.5.............
Carrick應該30M:icon101: 科素10M了:icon101: 真係荀呀 ... (我指阿伯):icon101: 希望番到身啦 我撐希斯基架 點解要希斯基都唔要科素
搭單一問︰宜家科素點? 力的表現:icon083: 韋斯咸用7.5m買艾殊頓抵爆...:) 原帖由 olepoon 於 2006-7-701:09 PM 發表
點解要希斯基都唔要科素
搭單一問︰宜家科素點?
科素好似留隊喎...希斯基都起碼冇咁易傷,同埋有身體優勢, 雖然佢唔係射手,都幾肯走同助守.都算將勤補拙啦 原帖由 ivansclo 於 2006-7-712:34 PM 發表
真係荀呀 ... (我指阿伯):icon101:
:icon101:都係要蝕 原帖由 熱刺#29戴維斯 於 2006-7-705:22 PM 發表
:icon101:都係要蝕
econ 阿sir 話: sunk cost is not a cost ...:icon101: 原帖由 ivansclo 於 2006-7-705:54 PM 發表
econ 阿sir 話: sunk cost is not a cost ...:icon101:
account miss話sunk cost is irrelevant for decision-making.:icon111: 原帖由 ivansclo 於 2006-7-705:54 PM 發表
econ 阿sir 話: sunk cost is not a cost ...:icon101:
:icon112: 原帖由 robbierebrov11 於 2006-7-706:04 PM 發表
account miss話sunk cost is irrelevant for decision-making.:icon111:
你讀cost accounting?:icon101:
不過accouting record 都應該係 loss 來既
[ 本帖最後由 Gianni Rivera 於 2006-7-707:40 PM 編輯 ] 力的表現 :eek2:
頁:
[1]
2