見d人腳幾勁
原來loss緊3m==
同AZ傾掂買de zeeuw同schaars......
點知個wage budget爆晒=0=
要賣減d老主力先可以重建球隊/-\
feeder,parent咩都唔俾搞
慘 原帖由 LONGTZE 於 2006-11-1605:29 PM 發表
大佬,有入波同冇入波d分差好遠喎
有入波,冇失誤起碼有8分最少,多數會有9分
有入波,冇失誤 also can get 6/7 marks ga:icon064:有入波,冇失誤 not = good performance
Mind the word "=" 原帖由 damned 於 2006-11-1611:20 AM 發表
我都係講事實不是計對任何人
或者你下一季可以試下唔放佢near post
睇下佢入唔入到3球
同重有無7.5分以上囉
我就肯定唔會有
Of course, good performance + score can get higher marks, i agree that, in fact I just want to say that score not = have good performance:icon081: 原帖由 lung104 於 2006-11-1607:30 PM 發表
有入波,冇失誤 also can get 6/7 marks ga:icon064:有入波,冇失誤 not = good performance
Mind the word "="
我就冇見過我個米卡李察士有入波冇失誤得6/7分
角球set near post flick on 個個一定高分過其他後衛
因為入波多 原帖由 LONGTZE 於 2006-11-1607:48 PM 發表
我就冇見過我個米卡李察士有入波冇失誤得6/7分
角球set near post flick on 個個一定高分過其他後衛
因為入波多
So I saidi agree good performance + score can get higher marks:icon081:
頁:
1
[2]