WainSeven 發表於 2009-5-13 16:16:28

英超4+14政策出爐 賓叔:"That's a fuxking disgrace!!!"

Top flight backs home-grown quota
By James Pearce
BBC Sports News

Premier League clubs have agreed, in principle, to support a quota system for home-grown players.

Proposals for developing domestic talent will be discussed further by clubs next month and a new system could be introduced for the 2010/11 season.

The most likely outcome is that the Premier League will adopt the rules the Football League will use next season.

From August, Football League clubs will have to name at least four home-grown players in their match-day squad.

In this system any player who has been registered domestically for at least three years before their 21st birthday is classed as home grown, so for example Cesc Fabregas would be a 'home-grown' Arsenal player.

Fifa president Sepp Blatter wants to bring in a global '6+5' rule, which would mean each side would be required to have at least six players eligible to compete for the country in which the league is based.

However, the subject of protecting home-grown talent is a thorny issue and Richard Scudamore, the chief executive of the Premier League, remains adamant that Blatter's proposals do not stand up to European law.

The Premier League has also been looking at other ways to boost the supply of English players at the top level of the game.

An alternative for the Premier League could be to replicate Uefa rules where clubs in the Champions League have to submit a squad of 25 players, eight of which must have been through the youth system of a club from that country.

However, Premier League clubs are unlikely to agree to capping squad sizes at just 25 players.


結果阿仙奴都係可以無英格蘭人:icon101:

[ 本帖最後由 WainSeven 於 2009-5-1402:04 PM 編輯 ]

Dioray 發表於 2009-5-13 16:30:11

最大影響其實係利物浦,一線隊除左老四同加力查,幾乎無人合資格

WainSeven 發表於 2009-5-13 16:37:19

原帖由 Dioray 於 2009-5-1304:30 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
最大影響其實係利物浦,一線隊除左老四同加力查,幾乎無人合資格
借左出去唔知計唔計1年:icon101:

klinskan 發表於 2009-5-13 17:48:29

原帖由 Dioray 於 2009-5-1304:30 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
最大影響其實係利物浦,一線隊除左老四同加力查,幾乎無人合資格
So

barry來投的機會 己經達90%

仲有傳緊的格連莊臣 連濃 唐寧等~!

加上 恩梳亞 艾沙亞等都就黎夠期

[ 本帖最後由 klinskan 於 2009-5-1305:49 PM 編輯 ]

ken809 發表於 2009-5-13 19:02:28

青訓萬歲?:icon101:

alan_given 發表於 2009-5-13 19:55:00

原帖由 ken809 於 2009-5-1307:02 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
青訓萬歲?:icon101:

買返黎的青訓萬歲?:icon101:

~~冬之子~~ 發表於 2009-5-13 20:01:23

阿仙奴的勝利:icon101:

Keith 發表於 2009-5-13 21:31:22

一切都在教授計算之中:icon032:

dtclaw 發表於 2009-5-13 22:59:45

利物浦可唔可以申請轉戰西甲:icon101:

杰少仔 發表於 2009-5-13 23:06:45

曼聯有so:icon101:

熱刺#29戴維斯 發表於 2009-5-13 23:10:21

作用不大

係咁意wiki check過

20隊波係得利記有呢個問題

我覺得應該規定埋年齡, 例如4個入面要有一半係22,23歲以下甚至年齡較輕的

否則踢果d咪又係d 28,30的球員, 有乜幫助?:icon103:

好衰唔衰而家又7個後備, 夠薑ge後備用1,2個位放d 萬年大後備充數都仲得,你耐得佢何?

假設星仔同難離都係英籍, 你話老費會放邊個落18人大軍lar?:icon032:

射手shooter 發表於 2009-5-13 23:35:56

無鬼謂:o

2076 發表於 2009-5-13 23:37:46

我覺得都係好事唻ge...:icon101:

小妖 發表於 2009-5-13 23:42:17

某不具名英超主帥: 應該強制英超球隊同時要有10個英格蘭球員上場 (門將除外) :( :icon101:

TAMTOM 發表於 2009-5-13 23:48:34

原帖由 klinskan 於 2009-5-1317:48 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

So

barry來投的機會 己經達90%

仲有傳緊的格連莊臣 連濃 唐寧等~!

加上 恩梳亞 艾沙亞等都就黎夠期
格連莊臣 唐寧..:icon088:

Zero 發表於 2009-5-13 23:50:25

其實4個唔算太過份
Liverpool都有自己既青訓系統

alan_given 發表於 2009-5-14 00:04:17

原帖由 Zero 於 2009-5-1311:50 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
其實4個唔算太過份
Liverpool都有自己既青訓系統

當少咁兩個後備位?:icon101:
不過如果一有本土球員傷就大件事:(

alan_given 發表於 2009-5-14 00:08:30

原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2009-5-1311:48 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

格連莊臣 唐寧..:icon088:

翼你唔係話好需要咩, 唐寧岩咀形啦
有GJ同唐寧做back up唔係幾好咩

麥記 發表於 2009-5-14 03:14:18

吊恩蘇亞同艾沙亞咪又係夠home grown, 洗乜驚 :onion39:

andres_tabris 發表於 2009-5-14 03:24:30

原帖由 Keith 於 2009-5-1309:31 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
一切都在教授計算之中:icon032:

如果唔係點會叫做教授:icon032:
頁: [1] 2
查看完整版本: 英超4+14政策出爐 賓叔:"That's a fuxking disgrace!!!"