al econ
when income effect is zero, mrs = muvwhy???? push~ zero / 大簡 where are u:icon003: According to IC analysis
Once Price ↓
there will be 2 effects : Substitution Effect + Income Effect
If the Income Effect = 0 ,
there's will be Sub. Effect only which states : Price and QD go in opposite direction
In this case, MRS ( the above approach) is the same as MUV
(MUV = the max. amount one is willing to give up for an extra good.X= Demand Curve = P↓ QD↑)
唔知岩唔岩,有點答非所問咁:icon064:
條問題係你學校阿sir出的嗎? 簡拿華路在 2004-12-13 03:13 PM 發表:
According to IC analysis
Once Price ↓
there will be 2 effects : Substitution Effect + Income Effect
If the Income Effect = 0 ,
there's will be Sub. Effect only which states : Price and QD g ...
唔知岩唔岩,有點答非所問咁
條問題係你學校阿sir出的嗎?
我就係唔肯定所以先唔答..... 簡拿華路在 2004-12-13 03:13 PM 發表:
According to IC analysis
Once Price ↓
there will be 2 effects : Substitution Effect + Income Effect
If the Income Effect = 0 ,
there's will be Sub. Effect only which states : Price and QD g ...
from textbook:icon018: choy991044在 2004-12-14 06:23 PM 發表:
from textbook:icon018:
哈, 作者係邊個先? 簡拿華路在 2004-12-15 11:23 AM 發表:
哈, 作者係邊個先?
Chan & Kwok:icon049: choy991044在 2004-12-15 11:52 AM 發表:
Chan & Kwok:icon049:
哦~
:icon068::icon068: is it wrong or ???? 而家d Econ 好難:icon014::o choy991044在 2004-12-7 10:25 AM 發表:
when income effect is zero, mrs = muv
why????
我估你條問題有少少問題...
MUV=MRS 係同 Dimishing MUV VS Dimishing MRS.
如果你係講income effect=0, 我估你的問題係後者. Dimishing MRS 係 Keep a movement along a single IC
So, Utility is Kept constent.
Keep movement on the same MV curve, MV may not downward sloping.
因為chinese in price in change of concumer surplus. By Real Income.
Price effect 可能 make MV upward sloping. (Giffen Gd)
而如果income effect = 0 , dimishing MRS = Dinishing MUV.
可能我可以help 到你. ...
其實都係同學生補習的note 中copy 出來.. :icon064:
頁:
[1]