芝加哥Fans 發表於 2005-4-2 14:16:26

cont not protect

係咪姐係要俾番錢 =.=

阿爆 發表於 2005-4-2 14:18:47

係 .....

芝加哥Fans 發表於 2005-4-2 14:44:43

第1年個個都係喎 =.=
點free去sign人 ..?
=o=

阿爆 發表於 2005-4-2 15:02:31

Originally posted by 芝加哥Fans at 2005-4-2 02:44 PM:
第1年個個都係喎 =.=
點free去sign人 ..?
=o=
你等12月尾用Bosman rule 簽 lor...:icon091:

芝加哥Fans 發表於 2005-4-2 22:08:58

個個都not prot既 =.=
個個都要俾番錢...
姐係點

rainlesskm 發表於 2005-4-2 22:13:51

Originally posted by 芝加哥Fans at 2-4-2005 10:08 PM:
個個都not prot既 =.=
個個都要俾番錢...
姐係點
NOT PROTECT唔代表份約完..................................

芝加哥Fans 發表於 2005-4-2 22:35:27

我指完個d.... =.=

阿爆 發表於 2005-4-2 22:53:51

Originally posted by 芝加哥Fans at 2005-4-2 10:35 PM:
我指完個d.... =.=
do u know what is bosman rule ....:icon110: 一個球員係有機會同時contract not protected and have bosman rule .... 你唔好見佢寫住contract not protected就以為無bosman rule .....:icon110:

芝加哥Fans 發表於 2005-4-2 23:46:10

咁姐係點....
仲有半年....
我sign佢就要我俾曬錢 =.=
個個都係咁 =o=

阿爆 發表於 2005-4-2 23:51:22

係揀approach to sign wor .... 唔係make an offer

阿爆 發表於 2005-4-2 23:52:59

請睇置頂Topic ...

Bosman Rule

當一個球員完結前6個月 , 球員自己可以跟其他球會商議轉會而不需現在球會同意 , 如果球員轉會 , 原屬球會不能收取任何轉會費 ~
但是Bosman rule 只是for UEFA 的國家聯賽內的24歲或以上球員 , 你是可以用Bosman rule 簽24歲以下球員 , 但係你要支付一筆賠償費用(Compensation fee) 給原屬球會

芝加哥Fans 發表於 2005-4-3 00:10:38

Originally posted by 阿爆 at 2-4-2005 11:51 PM:
係揀approach to sign wor .... 唔係make an offer
係呀....
only sign佢份cont丫ma
跟住就會咁....
我個時個贊古如夫斯基屈左我10m =.="

我就係睇完個頂topic都係咁先問

阿爆 發表於 2005-4-3 00:17:56

Originally posted by 芝加哥Fans at 2005-4-3 12:10 AM:

係呀....
only sign佢份cont丫ma
跟住就會咁....
我個時個贊古如夫斯基屈左我10m =.="

我就係睇完個頂topic都係咁先問
咁係你未睇清楚洗唔洗比compansation fee .... 贊古都要比即係 你係not protected 個陣sign 佢而唔係Bosman rule 個陣sign 佢ja :icon110:

芝加哥Fans 發表於 2005-4-3 12:02:13

唔明 =.=
佢6個月嫁喎..?
姐係點.....

咁第一年咪姐係冇人sign到 =.=?

阿爆 發表於 2005-4-3 12:46:54

Originally posted by 芝加哥Fans at 2005-4-3 12:02 PM:
唔明 =.=
佢6個月嫁喎..?
姐係點.....

咁第一年咪姐係冇人sign到 =.=?
你幾多月approach to sign 的 ??

芝加哥Fans 發表於 2005-4-3 16:44:48

佢張約完既前6個月.....
我個asst man同我講左我先就咁sign既...
都係咁....

阿爆 發表於 2005-4-3 20:06:41

Originally posted by 芝加哥Fans at 2005-4-3 04:44 PM:
佢張約完既前6個月.....
我個asst man同我講左我先就咁sign既...
都係咁....
有o的球員好怪唔係真係會12月30 就有得 approach to sign in Bosman rule 的 , 咁原本佢係contract is not protected 的 , 咁樣就比佢fake 左喇 ~ 所以我勸你下次都係睇清楚洗唔洗比compensation fee , 究係係bosman rule 定係 contract is not protected 先好買:icon081:

choy991044 發表於 2005-4-3 20:41:20

Originally posted by 阿爆 at 2005-4-3 08:06 PM:

有o的球員好怪唔係真係會12月30 就有得 approach to sign in Bosman rule 的 , 咁原本佢係contract is not protected 的 , 咁樣就比佢fake 左喇 ~ 所以我勸你下次都係睇清楚洗唔洗比compensation f ...
我一直都唔識分
所以次次要confirm 前睇一睇駛唔駛比錢:icon101:

芝加哥Fans 發表於 2005-4-3 20:59:27

邊度睇compensation fee
仲有,我唔係12去睇既 =.=
我1,2月先去睇....

阿爆 發表於 2005-4-3 21:08:12

Originally posted by 芝加哥Fans at 2005-4-3 08:59 PM:
邊度睇compensation fee
仲有,我唔係12去睇既 =.=
我1,2月先去睇....
比份contract 佢個陣 ... Comments 個part 有寫 ...
頁: [1] 2
查看完整版本: cont not protect