bosman rule
其實bosman rule即係點?果時kewell係咪用呢條rule? the case of kewell is not related to bosman rule 置頂Topic 有寫 ...
Bosman Rule
當一個球員完結前6個月 , 球員自己可以跟其他球會商議轉會而不需現在球會同意 , 如果球員轉會 , 原屬球會不能收取任何轉會費 ~
但是Bosman rule 只是for UEFA 的國家聯賽內的24歲或以上球員 , 你是可以用Bosman rule 簽24歲以下球員 , 但係你要支付一筆賠償費用(Compensation fee) 給原屬球會 Originally posted by dorky at 2005-6-25 11:25 PM:
其實bosman rule即係點?
果時kewell係咪用呢條rule?
波士文rule 係一個叫波士文見到當其時d球員福利唔好冇得自己轉會而創立既~ Originally posted by 基維蝦 at 2005-6-25 11:38 PM:
波士文rule 係一個叫波士文見到當其時d球員福利唔好冇得自己轉會而創立既~
no la...係bosman自己contract end時同其他球會簽約..之後唔記得佢既club..(holland邊間??)就告上court... Originally posted by stephenlion at 2005-6-25 11:48 PM:
no la...係bosman自己contract end時同其他球會簽約..之後唔記得佢既club..(holland邊間??)就告上court...
好似法國wa :icon091: 比利時 liege要減波士文人工續約(完合約個時).法國的dunkerque出價買
但 liege唔肯,根住佢就踢咩咩勞工法頭訴上歐洲法院:o
而當年ajax個批都可以話係第1代波士文的受惠者:o
[ Last edited by spurs_timduncan on 26-6-2005 at 12:04 AM ] Originally posted by spurs_timduncan at 25-6-2005 11:58 PM:
比利時 liege要減波士文人工續約(完合約個時).法國的dunkerque出價買
但 liege唔肯,根住佢就踢咩咩勞工法頭訴上歐洲法院:o
而當年ajax個批都可以話係第1代波士文的受惠者:o
[ Last edited by spurs_timdu ...
舊年mexes過羅馬果陣係唔係bosman 搞到roma 比人告???? Originally posted by spurs_timduncan at 2005-6-25 11:58 PM:
比利時 liege要減波士文人工續約(完合約個時).法國的dunkerque出價買
但 liege唔肯,根住佢就踢咩咩勞工法頭訴上歐洲法院:o
而當年ajax個批都可以話係第1代波士文的受惠者:o
[ Last edited by spurs_timdu ...
davis etc...yes! Originally posted by simonltk2000 at 2005-6-26 12:07 AM:
舊年mexes過羅馬果陣係唔係bosman 搞到roma 比人告????
雖然唔係好記得清楚,不過肯定唔關bosman when did this rule develop? Originally posted by W.James at 2005-6-26 12:20 AM:
when did this rule develop?
1993 ?
94
or 95
:( Originally posted by 截拳道小子 at 2005-6-26 12:20 AM:
1993 ?
94
or 95
:(
95/96 個季之前個段時間
頁:
[1]