車路士強陣君臨歐洲
問歐羅巴,誰與爭鋒?現在車仔只欠一位巨星加入,就是波歷克. 車仔今年一定3冠:icon112: Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-7-25 10:50 AM:
車仔今年一定3冠:icon112:
謝謝支持. 車仔並不需要Ballack............:icon111: 獨大了:icon120: Originally posted by SamiHyyyyyyyia at 2005-7-25 11:33 AM:
獨大了:icon120:
:icon101: Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-7-25 10:50 AM:
車仔今年一定3冠:icon112:
凡事沒有一定的,三冠:icon086:
你像利記上年一樣傷左半隊,睇下點
[ Last edited by Nhl00000 on 25-7-2005 at 01:20 PM ] Originally posted by Nhl00000 at 2005-7-25 01:18 PM:
凡事沒有一定的,三冠:icon086:
你像利記上年一樣傷左半隊,睇下點
[ Last edited by Nhl00000 on 25-7-2005 at 01:20 PM ]
哈,咁要睇下咩時間傷了!
如係一月果陣,咪買多十一個囉!:icon114:
不過講真,車仔的確係而家英國內最強 都唔明老穆點解堅持唔打4-4-2,而家有Wright可以作右翼,Robben作左翼,Duff作前鋒,仲可以解決家下中場3缺一既問題。何樂而不為? Originally posted by 網路新仔 at 2005-7-25 13:31:
都唔明老穆點解堅持唔打4-4-2,而家有Wright可以作右翼,Robben作左翼,Duff作前鋒,仲可以解決家下中場3缺一既問題。何樂而不為?
佢上季有用442 架.. Originally posted by TAMTOM at 25-7-2005 01:37 PM:
佢上季有用442 架..
一陣咋,後來發現沒有左翼就用番家下既4-3-2-1,而家都有啦..... Originally posted by 網路新仔 at 2005-7-25 01:31 PM:
都唔明老穆點解堅持唔打4-4-2,而家有Wright可以作右翼,Robben作左翼,Duff作前鋒,仲可以解決家下中場3缺一既問題。何樂而不為?
打442 即時無敵 :icon091: Originally posted by 網路新仔 at 2005-7-25 13:31:
都唔明老穆點解堅持唔打4-4-2,而家有Wright可以作右翼,Robben作左翼,Duff作前鋒,仲可以解決家下中場3缺一既問題。何樂而不為?
佢既4-5-1咁穩陣..我唔覺有必要轉打4-4-2.:) Originally posted by ~~Miguel~~ at 2005-7-25 03:26 PM:
佢既4-5-1咁穩陣..我唔覺有必要轉打4-4-2.:)
較接近433吧:icon088: Originally posted by 基維蝦 at 2005-7-25 15:29:
較接近433吧:icon088:
你可以咁講既...但唔覺Robben同Duff似前鋒多過似中場囉.佢地都經常回防.:) Originally posted by ~~Miguel~~ at 25-7-2005 03:32 PM:
你可以咁講既...但唔覺Robben同Duff似前鋒多過似中場囉.佢地都經常回防.:)
係正式4-3-2-1....
amc打free role...
robben同duff咪4圍走lor...:icon090: Originally posted by 網路新仔 at 25/7/05 13:31:
都唔明老穆點解堅持唔打4-4-2,而家有Wright可以作右翼,Robben作左翼,Duff作前鋒,仲可以解決家下中場3缺一既問題。何樂而不為?
上年杜奧巴都有唔少時間養傷,加上梅度事件
前面唔夠人想打442都打唔到 Originally posted by 洛奇 at 2005-7-25 15:49:
上年杜奧巴都有唔少時間養傷,加上梅度事件
前面唔夠人想打442都打唔到
但從今日友賽Milan黎講..Jose都好似想繼續打返上年最原本個陣...唔同既係古德約翰森打中場...:) Originally posted by ~~Miguel~~ at 2005-7-25 03:32 PM:
你可以咁講既...但唔覺Robben同Duff似前鋒多過似中場囉.佢地都經常回防.:)
當然,佢地可以話打左一個位係成條邊線打晒既位:icon118: Originally posted by ~~Miguel~~ at 25-7-2005 03:26 PM:
佢既4-5-1咁穩陣..我唔覺有必要轉打4-4-2.:)
我都知個陣型好勁,不過系人手問題。而家車仔已經有左Robben, Shaun, Cole, Duff。唔通要區地肆旦兩個踢後備咩。依表現講,當然系杜夫同羅賓正選,如果系咁,唔通車仔用21M買一個後備咋,Cole芑不是永不超生,簡直就浪費區地既才華。仲有,最大既問題系車仔購埃辛失敗,如果打三中場仲有一個位置邊個打上?Parker走埋,其餘又未夠班。老穆都可以用4-2-3-1,不過你地話區嚮有生之年會不會用呢個陣型?
頁:
[1]
2