PENNYDIOR 發表於 2005-8-22 01:26:21

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-8-22 01:15 AM:


無兵可用, 好難大變, 如果連阿記都變到同利記車仔個d "實際足球" :icon116:, 我寧願唔睇英超.

我唔贊成無兵可用,阿仙奴中前場人才可以有好多變化.

而我亦唔認為要改變就等於要打穩守突擊o既實際足球.

至於點改,就唔係我三言兩語可以講得到,但係,一成不變絕對唔係好事.

我舉幾個阿仙奴o既問題.例如,阿仙奴有能力傳中,但係接應傳中球唔太有效率.

又例如,柏金缺陣,亨利充當一個"小"playmaker o既角色,好多波都經佢腳,由佢策動,但係佢又好多時拖漫節奏,策動o既攻勢亦唔理想.

阿仙奴亦似乎欠缺遠射o既能力,面對密集防守,好多時都係要小組搓入去,而其實越接近對方球門,可以搓o既空間亦都越小,好多時都無從入手.

以上幾個問題,係唔係真係冇對應o既策略呢?

駿次郎 發表於 2005-8-22 01:26:30

Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-22 01:20:

佢仲想賣sol ,如果真有此事,仲點支持
邊個話旺熱想賣Sol ??
仲有, Vieira走唔係旺熱迫佢, 係佢自己決定, 反而旺熱同佢食o左幾晚dinner都挽留唔到

其實主要都係想講
我地限米煮限飯, 而家仲要係季初, 球隊要適應新o既進攻模式
而家只係輸第一場波, 仲要作客車仔, 唔好咁激進:icon093:

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-8-22 01:26:36

Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-22 01:22:


Arsenal d年青球員係外購
你要好好記住:icon119:

本身青訓:icon106:
自己無就要買架啦 ,唔係你地又話唔搞青訓啦喎:icon063::icon101:

beckham312oo 發表於 2005-8-22 01:27:00

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-8-22 01:25 AM:


你對Arsenal既要求比我對RM既要求更高..:icon101:

考慮下Arsenal既財力同佢ge size至得ga 因為被之前 50場不敗沖昏了頭腦?:(:icon101:

HackerWong 發表於 2005-8-22 01:27:11

Originally posted by 北倫敦之王 at 22-8-05 01:23 AM:
我覺得就算放柏金,今場都唔可以反攻到車仔

可以柏金做ball
Henry谷上前

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-8-22 01:27:49

Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-22 01:25:

唔通官方出口話真
人地否認你又唔信 ,講都無謂啦:icon101:

駿次郎 發表於 2005-8-22 01:28:09

Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-22 01:25:

唔通官方出口話真
如果係真
會出現類似Bentley被listed o既消息
唔好俾d小報放流料就嚇到

macro 發表於 2005-8-22 01:28:19

Originally posted by 駿次郎 at 2005-8-22 01:26 AM:

邊個話旺熱想賣Sol ??
仲有, Vieira走唔係旺熱迫佢, 係佢自己決定, 反而旺熱同佢食o左幾晚dinner都挽留唔到

其實主要都係想講
我地限米煮限飯, 而家仲要係季初, 球隊要適應新o既進攻模式
而家只係輸第一場 ...
只係愛之心责之切也:icon116:

Donald 發表於 2005-8-22 01:28:28

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-8-22 01:22 AM:


Shearer果種.

其實真係買得過Dean Ashton
唔需要正選,
做變陣棋子衝散後防線都好.....

雲佩斯有條件做呢樣野.

HackerWong 發表於 2005-8-22 01:28:34

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 22-8-05 01:26 AM:
我唔贊成無兵可用,阿仙奴中前場人才可以有好多變化.

而我亦唔認為要改變就等於要打穩守突擊o既實際足球.

至於點改,就唔係我三言兩語可以講得到,但係,一成不變絕對唔係好事.

我舉幾個阿仙奴o既問題.例 ...

少咁個Edu..:icon111:

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-8-22 01:28:42

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-8-22 01:27:


可以柏金做ball
Henry谷上前
頭先個陣真係無咩邊個話Hold 波特別好..

Siu_Boo 發表於 2005-8-22 01:29:16

Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-22 01:25 AM:

唔通官方出口話真

你都係都信晒阿仙奴全部負面消息
跟住就話要炒wenger都無計嫁喎:o

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-8-22 01:29:22

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-8-22 01:28:


雲佩斯有條件做呢樣野.
雲佩斯係我眼中既新Henry:icon101:

ivanwong123 發表於 2005-8-22 01:30:25

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-8-22 01:29 AM:

雲佩斯係我眼中既新Henry:icon101:

我認為佢專心去攻門比傳波好~

駿次郎 發表於 2005-8-22 01:32:09

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-8-22 01:26:


又例如,柏金缺陣,亨利充當一個"小"playmaker o既角色,好多波都經佢腳,由佢策動,但係佢又好多時拖漫節奏,策動o既攻勢亦唔理想.
阿仙奴亦似乎欠缺遠射o既能力,面對密集防守,好多時都係要小組搓入去,而其實越接近對方球門,可以搓o既空間亦都越小,好多時都無從入手.
我想Hleb分擔佢呢個角色, 但又驚咁樣佢會變成國家隊o既Henry... 唉...
不過佢做playmaker呢個戰術真係要轉, 如果唔係禁區無人進攻都唔知做乜好

絕對係... 令我諗起Parlour呢個進攻破壞者.. 佢以前d白痴勁射間中都有威脅, 俾d前鋒執下雞都好...
而家無乜人射遠射.... 大佬.. 駁下遠射射中人改變方向都好la...

Siu_Boo 發表於 2005-8-22 01:32:20

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-8-22 01:29 AM:

雲佩斯係我眼中既新Henry:icon101:

我覺得佢直頭學晒亨利d衰野:o

HackerWong 發表於 2005-8-22 01:33:08

Originally posted by 駿次郎 at 22-8-05 01:32 AM:

我想Hleb分擔佢呢個角色, 但又驚咁樣佢會變成國家隊o既Henry... 唉...
不過佢做playmaker呢個戰術真係要轉, 如果唔係禁區無人進攻都唔知做乜好

絕對係... 令我諗起Parlour呢 ...

Hleb係打AMC..
但佢唔係造ball個隻..

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-8-22 01:33:23

Originally posted by 駿次郎 at 2005-8-22 01:32:

我想Hleb分擔佢呢個角色, 但又驚咁樣佢會變成國家隊o既Henry... 唉...
不過佢做playmaker呢個戰術真係要轉, 如果唔係禁區無人進攻都唔知做乜好

絕對係... 令我諗起Parlour呢 ...
Hleb 做Hold 波個件真係唔太睇好

macro 發表於 2005-8-22 01:33:24

一句到尾,今年持有甘既表現,足協盃見

云格手下歐洲有表現,FM至可能出現

[ Last edited by macro on 22-8-2005 at 01:34 AM ]

jacky422213 發表於 2005-8-22 01:34:22

其實我唔太明點解佢唔放伯金出黎
頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
查看完整版本: Pls fire Wenger