Originally posted by robbierebrov11 at 2005-8-31 11:01 PM:
我覺得伊薩臣好廢wor..潘姆勁好多:icon8:
up to you............:o
Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-31 22:54:
haha...........how old is Lehmann?
let me to remind you" 1969年11月10日" 35 yrs old .
Isaksson could be considered as replacement!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
坐幾年? haha!!!!good ques ...
haha.....let me to remind you 大把keeper 打到37 38
haha!!! good answer:o
Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-31 10:54 PM:
haha...........how old is Lehmann?
let me to remind you" 1969年11月10日" 35 yrs old .
Isaksson could be considered as replacement!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
坐幾年? haha!!!!good ques ...
wright 黎到arsenal果陣,可唔可以remind me施文幾多歲,真係唔記得:icon101:
Originally posted by macro at 31-8-2005 11:02 PM:
我夠知唔係淨係可以買恩杰臣La,小朋友
:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o
但係人地肯放,又冇人爭,而且係年青高質ｇｋ,做乜唔ｔｒｙ????
人地有話過肯放咩
大朋友:o
Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-8-31 11:03 PM:
haha.....let me to remind you 大把keeper 打到37 38
haha!!! good answer:o
人家用37, 38 GK ,我地一定要跟??/:o:o:o:o:o
Originally posted by macro at 31-8-2005 11:06 PM:
人家用37, 38 GK ,我地一定要跟??/:o:o:o:o:o
事實上阿仙奴係跟左:o
Originally posted by Sol_Campbell at 2005-8-31 11:04 PM:
wright 黎到arsenal果陣,可唔可以remind me施文幾多歲,真係唔記得:icon101:
yes, becoz wenger didn't give hime much chance
:o:o:o:o
Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-31 23:06:
人家用37, 38 GK ,我地一定要跟??/:o:o:o:o:o
唔洗既 ,你地可以用40歲架麻:o:o:o:o:o
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-8-31 11:07 PM:
事實上阿仙奴係跟左:o
yes. I think arsenal is very stupid:o
Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-31 23:07:
yes, becoz wenger didn't give hime much chance
:o:o:o:o
你回應左個問題先啦:o:o:o:o:o
你又知伊薩臣肯做後備:icon124:?
Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-8-31 11:08 PM:
你回應左個問題先啦:o:o:o:o:o
seaman was 36 , so what......
I think seaman should leave us at early ages
Originally posted by macro at 31-8-2005 11:08 PM:
yes. I think arsenal is very stupid:o
你又知Poom係一個stupid既choice:icon101:
Originally posted by 阿忠 at 2005-8-31 11:08 PM:
你又知伊薩臣肯做後備:icon124:?
why you know he must reject??
ur question is meaningless.........:o:o:o:o:o:o
Originally posted by Keith at 31-8-2005 11:10 PM:
你又知Poom係一個stupid既choice:icon101:
以前既Poom真係好勁:icon8:唔知而家有冇退化到..
伊薩臣..1個FM/CM勁,但係真實好麻麻既龍..:icon019:
[ Last edited by robbierebrov11 on 31-8-2005 at 11:12 PM ]
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-8-31 11:10 PM:
你又知Poom係一個stupid既choice:icon101:
ok. time will tell us!
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-8-31 11:04 PM:
人地有話過肯放咩
大朋友:o
其實我都想問....:icon101:
Originally posted by macro at 31-8-2005 11:11 PM:
why you know he must reject??
ur question is meaningless.........:o:o:o:o:o:o
so do you
why you think poom is not good??:o:o:o
Originally posted by Sol_Campbell at 2005-8-31 11:12 PM:
其實我都想問....:icon101:
pls search more news for this ...............
don't ask me to post it....do it urself:o:o:o:o:o
雖然對標題不敢苟同...
但伊薩臣長遠黎計會有用過潘姆(當然肯唔肯先打SUB係後話)