Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-9-1 00:07:
我都覺得，家有一老，如有一寶
我懷念雲迪古 :icon099:
我懷念泰比、波斯歷治:icon101:
Originally posted by yuren at 1-9-05 04:45 AM:
我懷念泰比、波斯歷治:icon101:
反曼英雄
臥底烈士...:icon8::icon101:
當年wenger 做o左個白痴決定, 就係嘗試俾richard wright上位, o係主場對charlton時俾佢打正選(好似seaman 傷o左), 因為佢o既失誤, 俾人抄1-4... 我都仲記得場波...
而且佢買Poom 唔係為o左要個後備龍, 係一個可以同Lehmann 爭正選o既龍, 有咁上下經驗o既Poom 自然係適用人選
況且佢只係借番o黎, 就算唔好用都唔使貼錢送佢走
所以個人認為, wenger o既決定係正確
Originally posted by 巴卡仔 at 1-9-2005 00:01:
我唔覺macro你係認識足球lor,你認識足球就唔會有膽識發表呢篇偉論.
Poom大大話話係英超打左好多年,1直水準都好stable,又唔洗用咩錢買...
Isaksson除左年輕之外,我稔大家有留意ge話都知道拒絕唔會係一個大家渴望 ...
點睇佢都唔似阿仙奴球迷啦:o:o
Originally posted by vieria1 at 1-9-2005 00:20:
唔計GK,其實前中後Wenger係咪應該有D表示?冇柏金,前面創造力大打折扣,對車仔果場可見一班！賣咗韋拉,Silva、 Fabregas同Flamini明顯未能接班！萬一Toure、Senderos或Cole傷咗,邊個replace?唔係靠『屎 ...
咁你快D投向車仔既懷抱啦:icon040::icon040:
Originally posted by Peter WKC at 1-9-2005 08:43:
當年wenger 做o左個白痴決定, 就係嘗試俾richard wright上位, o係主場對charlton時俾佢打正選(好似seaman 傷o左), 因為佢o既失誤, 俾人抄1-4... 我都仲記得場波...
而且佢買Poom 唔係為o左要個後備龍, 係一個可 ...
贊同:icon118:
Originally posted by yuren at 2005-9-1 04:45 AM:
我懷念泰比、波斯歷治:icon101:
咁我好懷念梁卓長:icon101:
Originally posted by Peter WKC at 2005-9-1 08:43:
當年wenger 做o左個白痴決定, 就係嘗試俾richard wright上位, o係主場對charlton時俾佢打正選(好似seaman 傷o左), 因為佢o既失誤, 俾人抄1-4... 我都仲記得場波...
而且佢買Poom 唔係為o左要個後備龍, 係一個可 ...
我又唔覺得RW打得差...佢只係好唔好彩...
新特蘭而家個正選係邊個
Originally posted by 逍遙 at 2005-9-1 11:47 AM:
新特蘭而家個正選係邊個 奇雲戴維斯
Originally posted by 逍遙 at 2005-9-1 11:47 AM:
新特蘭而家個正選係邊個
kelvin Davis
點解係要投向車仔既:icon124:
Originally posted by macro at 2005-8-31 22:48:
恩杰臣唔好?????
:icon088:
浄係ｐｏｏｍ好過恩杰臣?????
如果夠好就唔會俾祖記放......
Originally posted by AirKID at 1-9-2005 11:04 AM:
我又唔覺得RW打得差...佢只係好唔好彩...
冇運既代表...
永遠都係失埋Ｄ冇得救既波....:icon110:
Originally posted by Peter WKC at 2005-9-1 08:43:
當年wenger 做o左個白痴決定, 就係嘗試俾richard wright上位, o係主場對charlton時俾佢打正選(好似seaman 傷o左), 因為佢o既失誤, 俾人抄1-4... 我都仲記得場波...
而且佢買Poom 唔係為o左要個後備龍, 係一個可 ...
好同意
借又唔係使好多$$
好用可以留佢，唔好用可以送佢走
有乜問題？
Originally posted by 沙基 at 1-9-2005 12:42 PM:
如果夠好就唔會俾祖記放......
van der sar夠俾祖記放lor......
vds唔係好龍門咩?
Originally posted by 沙基 at 2005-9-1 12:42 PM:
如果夠好就唔會俾祖記放......
泰基那迪夠俾祖記放lor......
泰基那迪唔好咩?
[ Last edited by macro on 1-9-2005 at 03:09 PM ]
Originally posted by 女武神 at 1-9-2005 01:14 PM:
冇運既代表...
永遠都係失埋Ｄ冇得救既波....:icon110:
咁佢打愛華頓都唔算好:icon124:
Originally posted by Keith at 1-9-2005 02:58 PM:
咁佢打愛華頓都唔算好:icon124:
第一季囉~第一季打得幾好~
之後就....:icon126:
基本上都冇乜幾場俾佢出..一出就失ｎ咁多球:icon126:
Originally posted by macro at 1-9-2005 02:56 PM:
泰基那迪夠俾祖記放lor......
泰基那迪唔好咩?
[ Last edited by macro on 1-9-2005 at 03:09 PM ]
你講架嘛~長遠投資~
伊撒臣俾祖記放個時先20歲...點解祖記唔長遠投資佢？:icon126:
泰基那迪成30歲先放~