Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-6 01:32:
冇可能..
冇可能..
首先,阿根廷未搵到理想嘅戰術用人;其次,表現出奇地無保證..
就哩兩點,完全達唔到頂級嘅要求..
或者有人會話,阿根廷衰極都仲喺外圍賽領先緊巴西,但係事實上成績唔 ...
咁可唔可以講下係邊個之下阿根廷打得出要求
同埋係點既打法呢
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 6-9-2005 01:40:
瑞典明屈阿根廷..
我有睇直播,成隊都踢得唔好,列基美仲明顯不在狀態添..
死守??
列基美一不在狀態
路爾斯干沙里斯既重要性就更重...
Originally posted by Roman8 at 2005-9-6 01:40:
馬些路.迪加度仲有冇入選??
佢應該係過去式喇..:icon082:
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 6-9-2005 01:34:
阿根廷外圍賽成績好睇過法國,但係表現起伏不定;法國就一直都埋門欠佳..
南美近年少左勁旅...
只餘下烏拉圭,哥倫比亞兩支傳統勁旅
厄瓜多爾只能靠其高原優勢頂住下主場戰績...
但法國既對手明顯較難對付...
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 6-9-2005 01:44:
佢應該係過去式喇..:icon082:
同Cesar同輩既Rosales如何? :icon082:
Originally posted by Roman8 at 2005-9-6 01:44:
南美近年少左勁旅...
只餘下烏拉圭,哥倫比亞兩支傳統勁旅
厄瓜多爾只能靠其高原優勢頂住下主場戰績...
但法國既對手明顯較難對付...
巴拉圭都係勁呀
防守既打法發揮得幾好
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 6-9-2005 01:47:
巴拉圭都係勁呀
防守既打法發揮得幾好
期望辛達告魯斯唔好傷咁多:)
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-6 01:42:
咁可唔可以講下係邊個之下阿根廷打得出要求
同埋係點既打法呢
比爾沙同碧卡文用人有別,後者嘅球隊踢落比較高創造力..
或者咁講,阿根廷寧可出雙攻中都唔出翼,側擊交俾翼衛,理應唔係問題..當下戰術上要取捨嘅就係攻中應唔應該打孖上..
Originally posted by Roman8 at 2005-9-6 01:45:
同Cesar同輩既Rosales如何? :icon082:
排喺施薩.迪加度之後呱..:icon082:
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 6-9-2005 01:47:
巴拉圭都係勁呀
防守既打法發揮得幾好
話時話
佢地係咪有點青黃不接??
龍門仲用緊泰比亞....:icon088:
有冇人有睇烏拉圭對哥倫比亞??
卡連尼表現如何??
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-6 01:47:
巴拉圭都係勁呀
防守既打法發揮得幾好
佢地今屆外圍賽已經唔算防守好咯..
Originally posted by Roman8 at 2005-9-6 01:51:
話時話
佢地係咪有點青黃不接??
龍門仲用緊泰比亞....:icon088:
有冇人有睇烏拉圭對哥倫比亞??
卡連尼表現如何??
智利?青黃不接得好明顯啦..
卡連尼哩場一般啦..失兩球都唔係佢責任..
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 6-9-2005 01:50:
比爾沙同碧卡文用人有別,後者嘅球隊踢落比較高創造力..
或者咁講,阿根廷寧可出雙攻中都唔出翼,側擊交俾翼衛,理應唔係問題..當下戰術上要取捨嘅就係攻中應唔應該打孖上..
但前線除左Crespo同Saviola
好似冇曬選擇...
唔計新力軍Farias同久未入選既Cavenaghi
陣容上,
Riquelme同Lucho應該唔會有打孖上既問題吧:icon087:
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 6-9-2005 01:53:
智利?青黃不接得好明顯啦..
卡連尼哩場一般啦..失兩球都唔係佢責任..
記錯左:icon101:
我成日掉轉左chile同paraguay:icon064:
巴拉圭龍門係邊個??
智利就擺明係ga喇:icon082:
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-6 01:50:
比爾沙同碧卡文用人有別,後者嘅球隊踢落比較高創造力..
或者咁講,阿根廷寧可出雙攻中都唔出翼,側擊交俾翼衛,理應唔係問題..當下戰術上要取捨嘅就係攻中應唔應該打孖上..
但係人選上既攻中都好飄忽，表現好既時候一個已經夠....
Originally posted by Roman8 at 2005-9-6 01:54:
陣容上,
Riquelme同Lucho應該唔會有打孖上既問題吧:icon087:
不,我唔會計Lucho做攻中..
阿根廷攻中多,但係攻中嘅拍檔亦多..
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 6-9-2005 01:56:
但係人選上既攻中都好飄忽，表現好既時候一個已經夠....
太多人選喇...
但大致上都係Aimar/Riquelme拍大頭/Lucho
但要攻起上黎,
我prefer aimar拍riquelme
其實aimar拍crespo未嘗不可
咁樣可用曬lucho,roman同aimar,
同時俾多個機會gallardo:)
Originally posted by Roman8 at 2005-9-6 01:55:
記錯左:icon101:
我成日掉轉左chile同paraguay:icon064:
巴拉圭龍門係邊個??
智利就擺明係ga喇:icon082:
紐維爾舊生正選維拿..:icon039:
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 6-9-2005 01:57:
不,我唔會計Lucho做攻中..
阿根廷攻中多,但係攻中嘅拍檔亦多..
Lucho,
有時我覺得佢change下踢法,
可能可以踢redondo咁既style
始終後腰我地已經有硬朗既mascherano
講最強
非Roman+Aimar莫屬
而andre一向好似iniesta係barca既作用咁...
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 6-9-2005 02:00:
紐維爾舊生正選維拿..:icon039:
諗起烏拉圭個Viera:icon101: