Originally posted by Damn Kirby at 2005-9-6 14:58:
咁既然得益得唔係烏茲別克又有乜需要重賽?
而家係fifa話要重賽
因為球賽已經唔係跟個例去踢
Originally posted by Yoshiki at 2005-9-6 15:00:
仲有得做?:eek2::icon092:
之後就冇架啦:icon126:
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-6 03:04 PM:
而家係fifa話要重賽
因為球賽已經唔係跟個例去踢
係果球12碼唔跟例乍喎,重賽o既時間充滿變數,咪仲唔著數,你話高人好多班就話姐,唔覺意比人入返粒咪仲............
Originally posted by 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 at 6-9-2005 01:42 PM:
有冇人可以解釋下發生左咩事:)?
係咪真係值得重賽:)?
球証既錯誤唔係球賽既一部份咩:)?
開左先例咁咪大把波都可以重賽?:eek2:
果一場波,巴林應該打少個tim la
落手救空門
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 16:18:
開左先例咁咪大把波都可以重賽?:eek2:
但係呢球係明顯地唔跟球例，冇得嗌
冇灰色地帶冇爭議性，亦直接地影響左戰果喎
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 6-9-2005 04:30 PM:
但係呢球係明顯地唔跟球例，冇得嗌
冇灰色地帶冇爭議性，亦直接地影響左戰果喎
咁熱刺遇上對曼聯同一樣事件有冇得上訴?
都係影響左個賽果喎:icon062:
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 04:31 PM:
咁熱刺遇上對曼聯同一樣事件有冇得上訴?
都係影響左個賽果喎:icon062:
咩事???唔記得
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 16:31:
咁熱刺遇上對曼聯同一樣事件有冇得上訴?
都係影響左個賽果喎:icon062:
球證可以解釋話睇唔到:icon105:
但係呢球可以點解釋???鬼上身乎??
Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 6-9-2005 04:33 PM:
咩事???唔記得
個波過哂白界冇判入波:)
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 6-9-2005 04:33 PM:
球證可以解釋話睇唔到:icon105:
但係呢球可以點解釋???鬼上身乎??
一時睇錯囉:icon101:
杜堅都認過喇:icon081:
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 16:35:
一時睇錯囉:icon101:
杜堅都認過喇:icon081:
但係而家問題係個12瑪應該重射
但係佢俾左個自由球對方:icon126:
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 6-9-2005 04:37 PM:
但係而家問題係個12瑪應該重射
但係佢俾左個自由球對方:icon126:
因何事要重射:eek2:
Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 04:37 PM:
因何事要重射:eek2:
攻方有球員係射之前入左禁區
按例係應該判無效,再俾攻方射多次
但球證判左俾守方自由球
Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 6-9-2005 04:40 PM:
攻方有球員係射之前入左禁區
按例係應該判無效,再俾攻方射多次
但球證判左俾守方自由球
明白:icon075:
因為我睇錯係攻方自由球:icon081:
烏茲別克話場波要由第38分鐘開始:icon101:
Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 6-9-2005 05:20 PM:
烏茲別克話場波要由第38分鐘開始:icon101:
第一回合...
差得幾遠:icon101:
唔鬼理
總之上場就買左烏隊贏啦:icon101:
Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 2005-9-6 04:27 PM:
果一場波,巴林應該打少個tim la
落手救空門
咪係紅牌都冇...剩俾十二碼
Originally posted by 歐石南 at 2005-9-6 04:06 AM:
因為果位日本傻仔球證出錯
宜家第一回合要重賽:icon110:
受害者係烏烏 但點解仲要重賽搞到佢無得嬴:(