烏茲別克多得你唔少

hehe0114

Originally posted by Damn Kirby at 2005-9-6 14:58:

咁既然得益得唔係烏茲別克又有乜需要重賽?

而家係fifa話要重賽
因為球賽已經唔係跟個例去踢

hehe0114

Originally posted by Yoshiki at 2005-9-6 15:00:

仲有得做?

之後就冇架啦

Nhl00000

Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-6 03:04 PM:

而家係fifa話要重賽
因為球賽已經唔係跟個例去踢

係果球12碼唔跟例乍喎,重賽o既時間充滿變數,咪仲唔著數,你話高人好多班就話姐,唔覺意比人入返粒咪仲............

Keith

Originally posted by 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 at 6-9-2005 01:42 PM:
有冇人可以解釋下發生左咩事?
係咪真係值得重賽?
球証既錯誤唔係球賽既一部份咩?

開左先例咁咪大把波都可以重賽?

講野無point的人

果一場波,巴林應該打少個tim la
落手救空門

hehe0114

Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 16:18:

開左先例咁咪大把波都可以重賽?

但係呢球係明顯地唔跟球例，冇得嗌
冇灰色地帶冇爭議性，亦直接地影響左戰果喎

Keith

Originally posted by hehe0114 at 6-9-2005 04:30 PM:

但係呢球係明顯地唔跟球例，冇得嗌
冇灰色地帶冇爭議性，亦直接地影響左戰果喎

咁熱刺遇上對曼聯同一樣事件有冇得上訴?

都係影響左個賽果喎

講野無point的人

Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 04:31 PM:

咁熱刺遇上對曼聯同一樣事件有冇得上訴?

都係影響左個賽果喎

咩事???唔記得

hehe0114

Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 16:31:

咁熱刺遇上對曼聯同一樣事件有冇得上訴?

都係影響左個賽果喎

球證可以解釋話睇唔到
但係呢球可以點解釋???鬼上身乎??

Keith

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 6-9-2005 04:33 PM:

咩事???唔記得

個波過哂白界冇判入波

Keith

Originally posted by hehe0114 at 6-9-2005 04:33 PM:

球證可以解釋話睇唔到
但係呢球可以點解釋???鬼上身乎??

一時睇錯囉


杜堅都認過喇

hehe0114

Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 16:35:

一時睇錯囉


杜堅都認過喇

但係而家問題係個12瑪應該重射
但係佢俾左個自由球對方

Keith

Originally posted by hehe0114 at 6-9-2005 04:37 PM:

但係而家問題係個12瑪應該重射
但係佢俾左個自由球對方

因何事要重射

講野無point的人

Originally posted by Keith at 2005-9-6 04:37 PM:

因何事要重射

攻方有球員係射之前入左禁區
按例係應該判無效,再俾攻方射多次
但球證判左俾守方自由球

Keith

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 6-9-2005 04:40 PM:

攻方有球員係射之前入左禁區
按例係應該判無效,再俾攻方射多次
但球證判左俾守方自由球

明白

因為我睇錯係攻方自由球

講野無point的人

烏茲別克話場波要由第38分鐘開始

Keith

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 6-9-2005 05:20 PM:
烏茲別克話場波要由第38分鐘開始

第一回合...

差得幾遠

Vincent_Chan

唔鬼理
總之上場就買左烏隊贏啦

基維蝦

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 2005-9-6 04:27 PM:
果一場波,巴林應該打少個tim la
落手救空門

咪係紅牌都冇...剩俾十二碼

逍遙

Originally posted by 歐石南 at 2005-9-6 04:06 AM:
因為果位日本傻仔球證出錯
宜家第一回合要重賽

受害者係烏烏 但點解仲要重賽搞到佢無得嬴