南宋討論
點解蒙古人一定要攻破襄陽先可以南下??唔可以係下游沿江攻上去架咩??
究竟襄陽有咩咁重要一定要硬攻不可?? Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-12 02:21 PM:
點解蒙古人一定要攻破襄陽先可以南下??
唔可以係下游沿江攻上去架咩??
究竟襄陽有咩咁重要一定要硬攻不可??
襄陽阻住左蒙軍沿河進攻 Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-9-12 14:28:
襄陽阻住左蒙軍沿河進攻
咁又點解一定要正面狂攻?? Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-12 02:39 PM:
咁又點解一定要正面狂攻??
詳情好難講
元軍係逐步對襄樊地區進行戰略包圍的
冇正面強攻襄陽城 Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-9-12 05:40 PM:
詳情好難講
元軍係逐步對襄樊地區進行戰略包圍的
冇正面強攻襄陽城
呂文煥開城的主因是樊城陷落........... Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 2005-9-12 07:19 PM:
呂文煥開城的主因是樊城陷落...........
宋朝好白痴,人地守左六年都冇救兵:icon101: Originally posted by 阿sa at 2005-9-13 00:19:
宋朝好白痴,人地守左六年都冇救兵:icon101:
冇計~大權根本唔係皇帝手上
情況就好似當年蜀國劉禪同姜維咁
唔同係蒙古兵冇係另一條路進攻 Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-9-13 00:21:
冇計~大權根本唔係皇帝手上
情況就好似當年蜀國劉禪同姜維咁
唔同係蒙古兵冇係另一條路進攻
就係點解唔係其他路線進攻?? Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-13 00:22:
就係點解唔係其他路線進攻??
我故唔太知
奇怪點解佢地唔係蜀國南下or攻打南京直落杭州 Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-9-13 00:21:
冇計~大權根本唔係皇帝手上
情況就好似當年蜀國劉禪同姜維咁
唔同係蒙古兵冇係另一條路進攻
有呀!~
打左好耐先入到蜀
蒙哥仲射鬼死左 Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-9-13 00:24:
我故唔太知
奇怪點解佢地唔係蜀國南下or攻打南京直落杭州
沿江而下
咪又係襄陽:o Originally posted by 歐石南 at 2005-9-13 00:30:
沿江而下
咪又係襄陽:o
咁但係佢果時點都攻左襄陽先
如果沿江而上前後夾擊
咁咪會快d Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-13 00:42:
咁但係佢果時點都攻左襄陽先
如果沿江而上前後夾擊
咁咪會快d
你知蒙古人唔曉游水
你仲叫佢坐船打仗:o Originally posted by 歐石南 at 2005-9-13 00:50:
你知蒙古人唔曉游水
你仲叫佢坐船打仗:o
攻佔四川
從永安往東出兵
大軍攻南京 同攻打襄場既三路會師:o 元軍打左襄陽幾年咁耐,一個原因就係建造水軍
而宋軍係開頭包圍既時候係有反包圍同有援軍的,但都不敵元軍
宋室前後進行13次突圍支援呂文煥,但係元軍的封鎖下,只有3次成功
咸淳九年（1273年）1月-2月期間
樊城失陷,元軍屠城,全城軍民全遭屠殺,屍體堆積如山
呂文煥向宋室告急之際,元軍以回回炮攻城,
結果軍民恐慌,許多將領向元軍投降
最後呂文煥為免屠城而投降 Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-9-13 01:07 AM:
攻佔四川
從永安往東出兵
大軍攻南京 同攻打襄場既三路會師:o
元冇水軍,唔可能直攻臨安 what is 回回炮? Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-9-13 01:19:
元冇水軍,唔可能直攻臨安
如果利用金、宋降軍
只求渡江，決戰於平原?? Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-9-13 01:52:
what is 回回炮?
類似投石機既物體 Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-9-13 02:27 AM:
如果利用金、宋降軍
只求渡江，決戰於平原??
問題係點樣渡江?
頁:
[1]
2