TAMTOM 發表於 2005-9-17 00:29:47

Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-17 00:28:


:icon101:
英格蘭係咪真係咁需要左翼呢?抑或英格蘭容唔容得下佢呢?
一兩年前已經開始起度諗 ,
其實英格蘭真係一定需要一雙翼咩?:o

Raul_Gonzalez 發表於 2005-9-17 00:30:46

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-9-17 00:29:

一兩年前已經開始起度諗 ,
其實英格蘭真係一定需要一雙翼咩?:o

哈哈,我都講提出過類似問題不下一次..:o

Blackburn_Owen 發表於 2005-9-17 00:31:29

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-9-17 00:29:

一兩年前已經開始起度諗 ,
其實英格蘭真係一定需要一雙翼咩?:o
傳統英格蘭踢法都係雙翼傳中比d前鋒去撞嫁啦

robbierebrov11 發表於 2005-9-17 00:32:34

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 17-9-2005 12:29 AM:

一兩年前已經開始起度諗 ,
其實英格蘭真係一定需要一雙翼咩?:o

4-5-1 搵朗尼踢左翼...
大力神真係好野:icon8:

Raul_Gonzalez 發表於 2005-9-17 00:32:36

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-9-17 00:31:

傳統英格蘭踢法都係雙翼傳中比d前鋒去撞嫁啦

當下英格蘭既不傳統又不歐陸..:icon124:

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-9-17 00:32:37

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-9-17 00:31:

傳統英格蘭踢法都係雙翼傳中比d前鋒去撞嫁啦
而家都用埋外籍領隊啦 ,唔係一定要用傳統英格蘭踢法麻:icon101:

Blackburn_Owen 發表於 2005-9-17 00:33:43

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-9-17 00:32:

而家都用埋外籍領隊啦 ,唔係一定要用傳統英格蘭踢法麻:icon101:
咁應該點踢????

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-9-17 00:33:52

Originally posted by robbierebrov11 at 2005-9-17 00:32:


4-5-1 搵朗尼踢左翼...
大力神真係好野:icon8:
但我覺得無咩所謂:icon101:
反而打得幾前 ,點都係踢輔鋒 ,不過偏左 左姐

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-9-17 00:35:23

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-9-17 00:33:

咁應該點踢????
我又無認真諗過喎:icon101:
可以試下踢簡單小組入攝足球掛 ,反正d 大牌球星入面無playmaker

Raul_Gonzalez 發表於 2005-9-17 00:36:12

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-9-17 00:35:

我又無認真諗過喎:icon101:
可以試下踢簡單小組入攝足球掛 ,反正d 大牌球星入面無playmaker

但係隊長同你地隊長都like放長傳呢..:icon101:

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-9-17 00:37:44

Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-17 00:36:


但係隊長同你地隊長都like放長傳呢..:icon101:
我地隊長唔放長傳都可以好屈啦 ,令一件就難講D:icon101:

FlyingDonkey 發表於 2005-9-17 00:40:12

英格蘭踢法, 有個柱男係前面頂麼?:o

捷克NeVeD子彈 發表於 2005-9-17 00:41:24

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-9-17 12:32 AM:

而家都用埋外籍領隊啦 ,唔係一定要用傳統英格蘭踢法麻:icon101:

艾歷臣係瑞典人
但思想係英國人:o

捷克NeVeD子彈 發表於 2005-9-17 00:42:13

Originally posted by FlyingDonkey at 2005-9-17 12:40 AM:
英格蘭踢法, 有個柱男係前面頂麼?:o
係囉,如果仲係奧雲+朗尼
要翼托麼
都好似好耐未見過英格蘭頭搥入波:icon102:

Blackburn_Owen 發表於 2005-9-17 00:42:28

Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-9-17 00:41:


艾歷臣係瑞典人
但思想係英國人:o
瑞典以前咪又係靠堅尼安達臣d 高空波:icon110:

TAMTOM 發表於 2005-9-17 00:42:50

Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-9-17 00:42:

係囉,如果仲係奧雲+朗尼
要翼托麼
都好似好耐未見過英格蘭頭搥入波:icon102:
我諗Owen 起英格蘭用頭入波都算多架啦:icon101:

hehe0114 發表於 2005-9-17 00:43:21

Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-9-17 00:42:

係囉,如果仲係奧雲+朗尼
要翼托麼
都好似好耐未見過英格蘭頭搥入波:icon102:
而家都冇咩翼

捷克NeVeD子彈 發表於 2005-9-17 00:43:59

Originally posted by Blackburn_Owen at 2005-9-17 12:42 AM:

瑞典以前咪又係靠堅尼安達臣d 高空波:icon110:

你既以前都幾以前wo:icon102:

FlyingDonkey 發表於 2005-9-17 00:43:59

Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-9-17 12:42 AM:

係囉,如果仲係奧雲+朗尼
要翼托麼
都好似好耐未見過英格蘭頭搥入波:icon102:
咪係, 除非 antigoal, 希斯基呢類柱男啦:o

FlyingDonkey 發表於 2005-9-17 00:44:34

Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-9-17 12:43 AM:


你既以前都幾以前wo:icon102:
拿臣都可以當柱男用:o
頁: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8
查看完整版本: 唉！始終都係未夠班