Originally posted by 女武神 at 2005-11-11 11:51 PM:
我冇話唔應該:o
只係反駁一下o者...
基本上要比狀態，我唔會有咩意見....因為我唔知佢地狀態點...
如果狀態差唔多，但用個能力較差，或者唔岩打既，我先會出聲...
作為中超人士, 點都要開開聲:o
唔係真係下年番中超好過:o
Originally posted by 女武神 at 2005-11-11 11:51 PM:
我冇話唔應該:o
只係反駁一下o者...
基本上要比狀態，我唔會有咩意見....因為我唔知佢地狀態點...
如果狀態差唔多，但用個能力較差，或者唔岩打既，我先會出聲...
隊波之前狂輸...咁都睇唔出戰術有問題? 睇唔出無防守既重要性? 都唔應該俾下機會人?
Originally posted by 女武神 at 2005-11-11 11:52 PM:
好似係第十二場先傷:icon110:
[ Last edited by 女武神 on 11-11-2005 at 11:55 PM ]
that's the time when Moyes losts his patient on Li Tie...
Originally posted by FlyingDonkey at 2005-11-11 10:42 PM:
點解唔係鐵鐵走係佢走:o
鐵鐵係 A team, 連達係 B team:o
冇得解
唔係邊個走先就係俾人逼
當然事實係李鐵排位係連達羅夫之前
不過我信就算冇李鐵,連杜羅夫佢都爭唔贏卡斯利+加維臣組合:o
連達羅夫當年係愛華頓打到一無是處
不過係瑞典同哥本哈根佢都係專打呢d波
做得好稱職:icon032:
Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-11-12 12:13 AM:
冇得解
唔係邊個走先就係俾人逼
當然事實係李鐵排位係連達羅夫之前
不過我信就算冇李鐵,連杜羅夫佢都爭唔贏卡斯利+加維臣組合:o
連達羅夫當年係愛華頓打到一無是處
不過係瑞典同哥本哈根佢都係專打呢d ...
Carsley好像仲係後備右中場咋個時..
有Pembridge嘛~~
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-12 12:36 AM:
Carsley好像仲係後備右中場咋個時..
有Pembridge嘛~~
彭比治係左/中中場:icon102:
Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-11-12 12:39 AM:
彭比治係左/中中場:icon102:
佢都唔打左la ...Pace 7:icon102:
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-12 12:36 AM:
Carsley好像仲係後備右中場咋個時..
有Pembridge嘛~~
總之你明我意思係話有冇李鐵,連杜羅夫都冇得留低就得
果時邊個打中場唔重要:icon102:
Originally posted by Tung at 12-11-2005 12:04 AM:
隊波之前狂輸...咁都睇唔出戰術有問題? 睇唔出無防守既重要性? 都唔應該俾下機會人?
戰術有冇問題我唔敢講....
因為由上季，到之前狂輸，到而家開始打返起...都冇乜分別...:icon101::icon101::icon101:
我只係想講，即使李鐵出，都未必做到我地想佢做既野....
如果話要俾機會睇下對唔對辦先決定，我真係唔同意....
Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-11-12 12:41 AM:
總之你明我意思係話有冇李鐵,連杜羅夫都冇得留低就得
果時邊個打中場唔重要:icon102:
如果咁講, Lind都應該有個後備位既~
但係連後備位都無~
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-12 12:56 AM:
如果咁講, Lind都應該有個後備位既~
但係連後備位都無~
以連杜羅夫果時既狀態同表現係英超根本就冇得留低:icon102:
Originally posted by 女武神 at 2005-11-12 12:51 AM:
戰術有冇問題我唔敢講....
因為由上季，到之前狂輸，到而家開始打返起...都冇乜分別...:icon101::icon101::icon101:
我只係想講，即使李鐵出，都未必做到我地想佢做既野....
如果話要俾機會睇下對唔對辦 ...
無分別?
上季
Kilbane Cahill Arteta/Gravesen Carsley Osman
今季初
Kilbane Phil Cahill Arteta Davies
今
VDM Cahill Davies Arteta
唔覺得上季個條MF line係有最高防守性?
咁季初見Phil做唔到純DM既工作
Moyes decides to 放棄防務, 以進攻為主(你見佢連Yobo都唔同)
係咪打起就好難講, 始終都係3場波姐~
"即使李鐵出，都未必做到我地想佢做既野...."你點知?
你想佢做咩?
Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-11-12 12:58 AM:
以連杜羅夫果時既狀態同表現係英超根本就冇得留低:icon102:
悲劇悲劇:icon101:
我諗無pt兄都係等Li Tie走先解到ban lu~:(
我一直諗唔明點解會有買返thomas既念頭
以前Duncan Ferguson已經係咁
而家又想again?
係
上季愛華頓ge成功係靠4-5-1
不過上季成功左
係咪代表今季用返都一樣可以成功呢:icon102:
個陣都比人睇穿左啦
既然而家買左幾個攻擊球員
比亞提又係4-4-2之下回復狀態
要球隊走返回頭路
係近乎冇可能的事
既然愛華頓進攻ge戰術一直冇變
都係斬斬斬
何不繼續擺多個前面砍下撞下
或者會有更多射門機會呢:icon102:
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-12 01:05 AM:
我一直諗唔明點解會有買返thomas既念頭
以前Duncan Ferguson已經係咁
而家又想again?
完全係兩件事
點可以拎黎比較:o
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-12 01:02 AM:
悲劇悲劇:icon101:
果陣真係覺得佢好q廢:o
Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-11-12 01:05 AM:
係
上季愛華頓ge成功係靠4-5-1
不過上季成功左
係咪代表今季用返都一樣可以成功呢:icon102:
個陣都比人睇穿左啦
既然而家買左幾個攻擊球員
比亞提又係4-4-2之下回復狀態
要球隊走返回頭路
係近乎冇可能 ...
老實說上季都無咁多斬~~
咁如果而家真係打起左都好,
買thomas做咩?叫佢做返係RM做既野?
Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-11-12 01:06 AM:
完全係兩件事
點可以拎黎比較:o
唔係比較
只係個買人方針比較....:icon102: