Originally posted by 女武神 at 2005-11-11 08:52 PM:
唔同意...:icon125:
而且李鐵唔夠硬掙，亦唔夠癲:icon124:
我唔係話Li Tie可以同Gravesen比
但係總唔係Thomas樣樣叻曬
Li Tie試過一場波跑左成12公里
你估下Thomas做dirty work既時候得唔得?
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-11 09:21 PM:
我唔係話Li Tie可以同Gravesen比
但係總唔係Thomas樣樣叻曬
Li Tie試過一場波跑左成12公里
你估下Thomas做dirty work既時候得唔得?
做dirty work體力好只是其中一個條件
仲有身位同tackle呢
gravesen唔係樣樣都叻哂
但綜合來說佢既條件一定比li tie好得多
做唔做得掂 ,睇皇馬就知:icon101:
Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-11-11 09:28 PM:
做dirty work體力好只是其中一個條件
仲有身位同tackle呢
gravesen唔係樣樣都叻哂
但綜合來說佢既條件一定比li tie好得多
Makelele有身位嗎?
何況唔係叫佢打Li個位嘛....
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-11 09:32 PM:
Makelele有身位嗎?
何況唔係叫佢打Li個位嘛....
咁唔同人都有唔同條件ga ma:icon101:
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-11 09:21 PM:
我唔係話Li Tie可以同Gravesen比
但係總唔係Thomas樣樣叻曬
Li Tie試過一場波跑左成12公里
你估下Thomas做dirty work既時候得唔得?
其實你有冇諗過,李生跑o左12公里,對場波本身有冇意義?
我覺得佢企位有時係幾有問題,一個好o既防中,位置感好重要,o係適當o既要害位置,作出攔截,補位,比佢一場波走幾多公里來得重要.
我明白,一個黃皮膚o既人,要取得外國教練o既信任,係比較難.
咁我諗唔算係歧視.就算係,都係人之常情.
如果我自己身為教練,o係兩個實力差唔多o既人作選擇,我一定會用自己友先.
你都會啦?
李鐵o既水準有冇話明顯好過幾他競爭對手??係一定要"明顯"wor,有冇?
Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-11-11 09:49 PM:
李鐵o既水準有冇話明顯好過幾他競爭對手??係一定要"明顯"wor,有冇?
除了每場跑得多d之外我就搵唔到其他了
Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-11-11 09:49 PM:
其實你有冇諗過,李生跑o左12公里,對場波本身有冇意義?
:icon075::icon071:
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-11 08:08 PM:
唔係話佢流
只係我覺得li tie既走動能力+範圍+氣力好過thomas
你講笑嗎?:o
Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-11-11 09:30 PM:
做唔做得掂 ,睇皇馬就知:icon101:
我就諗,如果將李鐵放落加維臣依家係皇馬個位會係邊境況:icon102:
Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-11-11 09:49 PM:
其實你有冇諗過,李生跑o左12公里,對場波本身有冇意義?
我覺得佢企位有時係幾有問題,一個好o既防中,位置感好重要,o係適當o既要害位置,作出攔截,補位,比佢一場波走幾多公里來得重要.
我明白,一個黃皮膚o既 ...
但唔係明顯特別差:o
比 D 後備/杯賽機會吧:o
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-11 09:32 PM:
Makelele有身位嗎?
:o一流
Originally posted by FlyingDonkey at 2005-11-11 10:26 PM:
但唔係明顯特別差:o
比 D 後備/杯賽機會吧:o
其實我唔反對用李鐵
只係講到李鐵好過加維臣先反駁:icon101:
Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-11-11 10:27 PM:
其實我唔反對用李鐵
只係講到李鐵好過加維臣先反駁:icon101:
呢點我都不甚同意:o
只是他們同場時候作用不同:o
感覺上愛華頓駛咪真係咁需要一個專門球員專做DIRTY WORK呢?
皇馬當年就真係為左令費高施丹放多D力落進攻而有個馬基利尼專門做呢樣野
但愛華頓似乎冇咁o既需要
Originally posted by 熱刺#29戴維斯 at 2005-11-11 10:30 PM:
感覺上愛華頓駛咪真係咁需要一個專門球員專做DIRTY WORK呢?
皇馬當年就真係為左令費高施丹放多D力落進攻而有個馬基利尼專門做呢樣野
但愛華頓似乎冇咁o既需要
但今年, 個個中場都攻攻攻, 多個 option 可以吧?:o
Originally posted by FlyingDonkey at 2005-11-11 10:31 PM:
但今年, 個個中場都攻攻攻, 多個 option 可以吧?:o
其實比返拎第七果年線中場線但今年呢一條就會發覺爭好遠:icon102:
Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-11-11 10:33 PM:
其實比返拎第七果年線中場線但今年呢一條就會發覺爭好遠:icon102:
但... 其實李鐵傳球能力都係被低估的:o
Originally posted by FlyingDonkey at 2005-11-11 10:31 PM:
但今年, 個個中場都攻攻攻, 多個 option 可以吧?:o
:o那唯有等莫耶斯嘗到惡果吧
Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-11-11 22:25:
我就諗,如果將李鐵放落加維臣依家係皇馬個位會係邊境況:icon102:
我就覺得差唔多:icon101:
皇馬都唔洗要加維臣既用波能力 ,單講破壞力我諗佢2個唔係差好遠姐