Crazy Post
Super OT 啦
人地討論內容俾你果d淨係識搵字,問價既post 更有討論價值:icon9: 原帖由 vanhooijdonk 於 2006-10-1302:01 發表
人地討論內容俾你果d淨係識搵字,問價既post 更有討論價值:icon9:
塞錢落你褲袋...........:icon110: 原帖由 JOHNATHAN 於 2006-10-1110:23 PM 發表
michael, 我回帖時都講過自己係純粹推測gei......不過照係咁講,因為舊年件歐聯版衫講到明係只用0係歐聯,但發售果d衫係全部章都齊全,只因為利記舊年16強已經出0左局先真係用無可用....但我想問係, 咁今年利記轉0左adid 衫,但所發售0既replica 衫全部係無任何歐聯章同左臂個5次奪冠個logo....咁如果依家0係市面出售0既replica 歐聯版係adid完全無任何章提供,會唔會係代表0左利記排除0係聯賽會有再用呢件3rd away 0既可能性呢(除左1月對屈福特/fa cup 果d)????最大原因係我完全唔知幾時著第2或第3球衣0既分別
我自己都身為利迷應該不恥下問,但呢d問題我覺得應該要問下你....因為你0既ans比較專業
Sorry that I type English much faster than Chinese characters.
Red highlighted: The Reebok 5-stars 2005-06 home shirt and the Adidas green/white 2006-07 third shirts are BOTH marketed as "UEFA Champions League" shirts by the corresponding manufacturers. There exists no differences between the Reebok one and the Adidas one. Thus you cannot guesstimate that "Oh, the Reebok 5-stars shirt is a MUST for CL games, but not exactly so for the Adidas green/white". I don't see any rationale for such a conclusion.
Green highlighted: The Reebok 5-stars shirt is NOT by default coming with the Liverpool Exclusive darker blue Champions League patches. No matter you buy the shirt from Hong Kong or UK, you need to pay out extra money to get the patches. You may still remember last year all the patches are kept by Chris Kay Hong Kong distributor and shopkeepers need to send the shirts for the badging work at Yuen Long. NOT every shirt is already badged up with the patches.
Purple highlighted: Don't compare Liverpool directly with the class of AC Milan or Real Madrid UEFA shirts made by Adidas. Do you know about the exclusiveness of Liverpool darker blue oval 5-times patch? The darker patch is TAILOR-MADE for Liverpool only - the colour of darker blue is adopted because Liverpool cannot accept any slight piece of sky-blue colour (the rival Everton strip) on any part of the shirt. Lextra especially manufactured limited quantity of these darker-blue oval 5-times patches as "Liverpool Exclusive" products. With the scarcity and an elastic demand, the price is not as cheap as the sky-blue ones for AC and RM. The absence of the oval-5-times patch on commercially sold Liverpool shirts is rather due to the higher costs.
If you mean about the 5-stars on the CL shirts of 2005-06 but not on 2006-07, it's rather the design issue that Liverpool doesn't adopt any CL stars for this season. It's just like the case of Man Utd adopting 1 star for CL 1997-1999 and 2 stars for CL 1999-2000 only, but not otherwise seasons.
Blue highlighted: The speculation of using the green/white kits in non-CL competitions seems to stem from the appearance of green/white shirts in the pre-season matches. I rather think the exposure in the pre-season only aims to promote a third kit in the market. This is just like the case of Man Utd adopting the gold centenary kit in a Thailand pre-season match but afterwards only in the case of kits colour-clash - CL away against Olympiakos, League Cup tie against Arsenal. The purpose and usage of third shirt is always NOT to achieve a balance of use of away and third shirts in the whole season. The sole and dominant purpose is always set to use a third kit in case of colour clash (just like the use of green Carlsberg can 1999-2000 Liverpool away shirt in an EPL match of 2000-01 season - the Bradford City away match played on 1 May 2001).
http://www.michaelyip.com/LFC99APC2.jpg
Brown highlighted: As aforesaid, the purpose of a third kit is to avoid colour clash embarassment when both the home and away kit are unable to be used. It is NOT by default Liverpool will wear the green/white CL kit in ALL CL away matches. The use of yellow away CL shirt in the PSV match is a good example. Without clashing red and yellow, there's no need to adopt the green/white kit.
A final example is the Liverpool 1988-1989 third full-white shirt. This was a ONE-OFF shirt only worn against Aston Villa (whose strips rather like the Denmark Euro Winners shirt by Hummel, with halves and red/grey stripped pattern). Villa's kit completely clashed with Liverpool's red home and grey away. So would Liverpool try to utilise the third full-white kit in otherwise matches so as to gain "exposure" to that shirt? The answer is NO.
http://www.michaelyip.com/LFC88TPC.jpg
http://www.michaelyip.com/LFC88TP-a.jpg
[ 本帖最後由 michaelyip.com 於 2006-10-1301:28 AM 編輯 ] 原帖由 michaelyip.com 於 2006-10-1301:27 AM 發表
Sorry that I type English much faster than Chinese characters.
Red highlighted: The Reebok 5-stars 2005-06 home shirt and the Adidas green/white 2006-07 third shirts are BOTH marketed as &qu ...
"加力茶" 件 "啤酒罐" 好似係細 carlsberg o黎o窩... 原帖由 faister 於 2006-10-1301:36 AM 發表
"加力茶" 件 "啤酒罐" 好似係細 carlsberg o黎o窩...
Yes, there's a funny Riedle too at ebay...no rear shinny plastic tag and size tag reads XL. What's ironic is that Riedle left Liverpool on 28/09/1999 to Fulham and a small Carslberg shirt was only worn in May 2001.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/RIEDLE-LIVERPOOL-AWAY-match-issued-LS-2000-2001_W0QQitemZ140039918588QQihZ004QQcategoryZ106511QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
VERY RARE SHIRT ... FOR COLLECTORS ONLY
RIEDLELIVERPOOL AWAY SHIRT LONG SLEEVE
MATCH ISSUED SHIRT. PREMIER PLAYERS PRINTING SIZE
SETS + PREMIER PLAYERS SIZE BADGE ON SLEEVES.
SIZE XL , SEASON 2000-2001
VISITING MY EBAY STORE YOU WILL FIND MANY
RARE SHIRTS
http://i18.ebayimg.com/05/i/08/74/ba/b1_1.JPG
http://i4.ebayimg.com/01/i/08/96/81/50_1.JPG 原帖由 michaelyip.com 於 2006-10-1301:40 AM 發表
Yes, there's a funny Riedle too at ebay...no rear shinny plastic tag and size tag reads XL. What's ironic is that Riedle left Liverpool on 28/09/1999 to Fulham and a small Carslberg shirt was o ...
哩個 seller o的運費好嚇人... 我問過佢.. 1-4 件衫都係收 eur 50 運費... 如果唔係o甘"拿利" .. 佢昨晚有件巴拉福特 l/s #10 我已經上釣... michael, I'm still reading on your answer statements, anyway, realli thanks for ur professional ans^ ^
[ 本帖最後由 JOHNATHAN 於 2006-10-1308:24 PM 編輯 ] 請問係唔係黎緊作客加拉塔沙雷, 利記好有機會會著綠白作客呢? Thanks! michael 如果reebok 嘅利記落場版同fans版點分?
仲有點解利記今年英超adidas 波衫左手唔會好似ac咁有歐聯5號章?
因為ac聯賽版左手邊有6號章!
原帖由 michaelyip.com 於 2006-10-1301:40 AM 發表
Yes, there's a funny Riedle too at ebay...no rear shinny plastic tag and size tag reads XL. What's ironic is that Riedle left Liverpool on 28/09/1999 to Fulham and a small Carslberg shirt was o ... 原帖由 inter456 於 2006-11-2903:56 PM 發表
michael 如果reebok 嘅利記落場版同fans版點分?
仲有點解利記今年英超adidas 波衫左手唔會好似ac咁有歐聯5號章?
因為ac聯賽版左手邊有6號章!
係哦,我都唔明why ac 聯賽版左手邊為什麼會有6次章 原帖由 inter456 於 2006-11-2903:56 PM 發表
michael 如果reebok 嘅利記落場版同fans版點分?
仲有點解利記今年英超adidas 波衫左手唔會好似ac咁有歐聯5號章?
因為ac聯賽版左手邊有6號章!
Reebok利記落場版太多件了, 你都係自己入去睇睇想搵邊件喇:
http://www.michaelyip.com/Know.html
英超聯協會好似唔俾係英超賽事落有其他比賽implication既章喎. 原帖由 Gilardino 於 2006-11-2912:10 PM 發表
請問係唔係黎緊作客加拉塔沙雷, 利記好有機會會著綠白作客呢? Thanks!
http://www.uefa.com/footballEurope/Club=50067/competition=1/index.html
Home = white;
http://www.uefa.com/ml/images/Kits/UCL/front/50067_H.gif
Away = orange/dull-red
http://www.uefa.com/ml/images/Kits/UCL/front/50067_A.gif
Liverpool will still wear RED HOME shirt. :icon124: 原帖由 Gilardino 於 2006-11-2912:10 PM 發表
請問係唔係黎緊作客加拉塔沙雷, 利記好有機會會著綠白作客呢? Thanks!
好野, 終於都有著呢件踢歐聯:icon107: 原帖由 Gilardino 於 2006-12-612:10 PM 發表
好野, 終於都有著呢件踢歐聯:icon107:
個formotion tag係綠色既...
http://eur.news1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/ng/sp/empics/4206012
http://eur.news1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/ng/sp/empics/4205520 原帖由 michaelyip.com 於 2006-12-612:51 PM 發表
個formotion tag係綠色既...
http://eur.news1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/ng/sp/empics/4206012
http://eur.news1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/ng/sp/empics/4205520
MICHAEL 兄.個formotion tag太細睇唔清楚.你係睇到有大圖睇到定係有人話你聽呢?如果formotion tag係綠色就幾靚喎.
頁:
1
[2]