AL Econ

Zero

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-9 10:07 PM:

我去搵人Confirm我既答案,所以Del左

捷禾@Ajax

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-10 12:37 AM:


我去搵人Confirm我既答案,所以Del左

anyway thx

Zero

好,思前想後,終於知道邊度有問題

所謂既Rent is a part of Cost
遮係話Total Cost既一部份係Rent

Chy991044既意思係
要出價>Rent先成立

但我既理解係
任何時候都成立.....

因為你有其他cost架嘛.....

我講得詳細d
當無呢個Transfer of ownership
你既Cost就係Total Resources forgone for Production
遮係平時果條Cost Curve
之後自然會有相應既Revenue Curve
TR同TC既Difference就係Rent

當有左Transfer of ownership
你既賣價應該同Rent一樣(no transaction cost, perfect information)
所以Total Cost of running the business就會加上個Rent....
production resources forgone + 收唔到筆錢嘛....

其實,我唔係好肯定,
我覺得係有Transfer of ownership+perfect information既時候
TR同TC應該collides.....

呢個就唔該你地自己問先生,補習既都好....錯左我唔負責

Canna,double check plz....我好無信心....

Zero

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-10 12:48 AM:

anyway thx

唔係99%肯定既野我唔會答...尤其係學術性既野,sorry.

捷禾@Ajax

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-10 12:53 AM:
好,思前想後,終於知道邊度有問題

所謂既Rent is a part of Cost
遮係話Total Cost既一部份係Rent

Chy991044既意思係
要出價>Rent先成立

但我既理解係
任何時候都成立.....

因為你有其他cost架 ...

好detail..等我再諗清楚先

真係唔該哂

捷禾@Ajax

呢鋪真係明喇

唔知點唔該你地好

choy991044

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-10 12:53 AM:


Chy991044既意思係
要出價>Rent先成立

我唔係咁既意思
不過咁講明顯d姐

Zero

Originally posted by choy991044 at 2005-1-10 10:38 AM:


我唔係咁既意思
不過咁講明顯d姐

sorry,會錯意

簡拿華路

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-10 12:53 AM:
好,思前想後,終於知道邊度有問題

所謂既Rent is a part of Cost
遮係話Total Cost既一部份係Rent

Chy991044既意思係
要出價>Rent先成立

但我既理解係
任何時候都成立.....

因為你有其他cost架 ...

解釋得很仔細

Take-over price 大過 Net Value 就有 goodwill

[ Last edited by 簡拿華路 on 11-1-2005 at 01:02 AM ]

簡拿華路

出價 細過個 rent..
其實都有可能架喎

Zero

Originally posted by 簡拿華路 at 2005-1-11 01:03 AM:
出價 細過個 rent..
其實都有可能架喎

上到大學就咩都有可能架啦

捷禾@Ajax

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-11 01:50 AM:

上到大學就咩都有可能架啦

Originally posted by 簡拿華路 at 2005-1-11 01:03 AM:
出價 細過個 rent..
其實都有可能架喎

兩位而家讀緊咩科

Econ

簡拿華路

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-11 08:36 AM:




兩位而家讀緊咩科

Econ

Econ and Finance d人第一個sem無econ讀

我地上個sem就有一個econ course讀
堂堂都一齊坐添
下個sem無econ 太好了

我本來對AL ECON 都有d興趣的
但一上到大學知道econ要有數底 我就卻步了

捷禾@Ajax

Originally posted by 簡拿華路 at 2005-1-11 10:16 PM:


Econ and Finance d人第一個sem無econ讀

我地上個sem就有一個econ course讀
堂堂都一齊坐添
下個sem無econ 太好了

我本來對AL ECON 都有d興趣的
但 ...

其實係咪真係需要好強o既數底

簡拿華路

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-11 11:21 PM:

其實係咪真係需要好強o既數底

唔太清楚

zero見字幫我解答

Zero

Originally posted by 簡拿華路 at 2005-1-12 12:59 PM:


唔太清楚

zero見字幫我解答

UST會係比較注重,雖然雷鼎鳴既'解釋'我覺得好主觀.....


但我同Canna放棄既真實原因係.....





我地發現左所謂既'經濟'其實係'吹水'
一大班人係自己set死既世界亂吹一通
之後就同人講呢個model好'實用'

捷禾@Ajax

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-12 08:25 PM:


UST會係比較注重,雖然雷鼎鳴既'解釋'我覺得好主觀.....


但我同Canna放棄既真實原因係.....





我地發現左所謂既'經濟'其實係'吹水'
一大班人係自己set死既世界亂吹一通:ico ...

但係我想讀

知唔知邊度會有多d 呢方面o既information,

簡拿華路

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-12 08:25 PM:


UST會係比較注重,雖然雷鼎鳴既'解釋'我覺得好主觀.....


但我同Canna放棄既真實原因係.....





我地發現左所謂既'經濟'其實係'吹水'
一大班人係自己set死既世界亂吹一通:ico ...

uncertainty 呢課最虧

簡拿華路

Originally posted by 捷禾@Ajax at 2005-1-12 08:32 PM:

但係我想讀

知唔知邊度會有多d 呢方面o既information,

直接問下d undergraduate